 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kalius
|
 |
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002 time: 16:21
|
|
I never said they would lose to Indy. At the moment it seems like they are better, but before they played, Miami looked inferior to St Louis.
You can't say they will definately beat Indy because chances are they'll be thrashed. Chances are they'll win by a mile.
quote: An injury to their starting RBs doesn't seem to hurt them any. |
Best run blocking line in football, and a bus which has been sitting on the sidelines like a caged lion... I'm not surprised. Starting RBs aren't as important to a team if you have a good O-Line, which the Steelers have. Rhodes went for 1000 yards as an undrafted rookie in 2001, and Derrick Blaylock was no slouch last week in Priest Holmes' absense.
I see the Steelers losing if they lose Hines Ward or Plaxico Burress. At the moment they have offensive balance which is spreading defenses. Lose one of them, and you can concentrate on the others, like we've seen with Minnesota. That's the key to the Steelers' success: balance. Their line has been opening up holes for Bettis, and Roethlisberger's movement has given him time to find open receivers. Take away the receivers and Roethlisberger might not have as much time to find receivers.
Their defense has been stopping the run admirably, so their poor secondary has had an easier time of it. But if a team manages to pull out a good game plan against the Steelers, and take advantage of a weakness in their front seven, then they'll be stretched more.
When a team surprises everybody they look dominant, but sooner or later a team will find a flaw which sends it down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|