 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:18
|
|
c'mon kid
Name just one place where "everyone is equal" has been implemented successfully.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:18
|
|
Kid - quote: No. Working people pay all the bills bud. |
But some pay more than others while some pay very little if anything, that's bill "sharing" and you support it to the point where there won't be any unequal wealth accumulation. So why did you deny your ideology involves this bill sharing?
quote: I think racism played a pert there. |
Regardless of what was involved, the fact remains slaveowners did not free their slaves so they could charge them rent as you claimed.
quote: I told you I wouldn't care about your claim. |
Did I say you would care? The question is: would my claim have validity and the answer is NO. So why do you think that's comparable to a business owner and employee?
quote: Say you paid for it before we were stranded. |
Then it's mine. I see you changing your hypothetical, I'll take that as a recognition your analogy is flawed. That ain't all 
quote: I still would not care. I wouldn't work for you, because I don't believe in that. |
Then don't work for me, but I sure as hell will give you a ride elsewhere because you ain't staying on my island with that attitude.
quote: I wouldn't consider it stealing if I picked my own bananas and ate them all. |
If I owned them it would be stealing and you would too if I walked into your home and started using your stuff without your permission.
quote: If you tried to take the bananas from me, claiming that they were yours, I would consider that stealing. |
Strange, it's not stealing if you take my bananas but it is stealing if I take "your" bananas? You're all over the map, Kid.
quote: You have no 'just' moral claim to my work. I don't care what you 'own.' You own the business because of the constraints placed on me by the society we live in. That's the only reason. There is no 'just' moral claim. |
So "society" does not define morality? I've been saying that here at Poly for years. Okay, then why introduce society into our hypotheticals about two people alone in the world or on a deserted island? Let's just keep it simple: you and I are alone in the world but in close enough proximity to interact. I build a house, a mine for smelting metal, etc, and I make iron spears for hunting. Then I plant corn and spend hours tending to my crops. You come along and demand the use of my spears and corn because morality dictates you have a greater valid claim to them than me, the person who produced them. Why?
quote: No. We simply keep all of our work. |
But my business was not our work, it was my work. Since you'd refuse to work for me, can I ask others to work for me? If not, why? Because only you and those who share your ideology get to decide who is exploited and who is not? Religious fundies use the same argument when it comes to the sex industry. And if you decide exploitation exists you then get to force me and my employee to hand over our stuff and work for Kidocracy? Calling that freedom and morality is downright Orwelian...
quote: You no longer get any of it. You can continue to claim ownership to our work and call us theives like a lunatic. We just ignore you. |
Your work? All you did was walk in and rob me in the name of morality and freedom.
quote: I believe that people should have the right to privacy at their residence |
"Their" residence? How does one acquire a residence if they can't hire people to build houses? You don't believe in this right if I invite my neighbor in to help me re-model for a fee, true?
quote: and I believe that people should have exclusive rights to some things that they pay for with their work. |
But we can't work for others, that's exploitation. So we must all be self-employed? What happens when I produce a very desired product and you don't, so you have to work longer to make more to match my income?
Are consumers "exploiting" you now?
quote: But I don't believe that people should be able to own the means of production for the purpose of either exploiting workers or preventing workers from using those means. |
Since you believe it is exploitation for my neighbor to hire me to fix his car for a fee, why isn't it exploitation for Kidocracy to hire me to fix cars for a fee?
quote: I think eminent domain should apply |
Do you know where that came from? KINGS! DICTATORS claiming a "right" to grab what they wanted from others. I'm not surprised to see you embrace such an idea. Even the Founders who were much closer to the trappings of Kingship knew the abuse that power came with and tried to limit it to federal installations, and it didn't take long for politicians to ignore that limitation.
quote: I don't find that immoral. |
But you get to decide when it's exploitive, not the people actually involved.
quote: It's economical to use the public tools. |
So if I "own" a car repair shop, I have to travel to the local public tool dispensary everytime I need a tool? Or do I just get to "keep" the tools I need for my trade without paying for them?
Kid, it seems your gripe is that people with machines hire others to run them and don't provide enough compensation. Without this just compensation, the machine operator is being exploited. So, how in the name of morality and freedom can you remove the autonomy of the parties involved? If I run the machine and I believe my compensation is fair, why is it your business? For you to remove my freedom to make that decision and justify your action by accusing my employer of removing my freedom is a logic trap. You're doing what the employer is allegedly doing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:18
|
|
Kid - quote: About the planners, yes, there is the possibilities for corruption. That's a political problem, not an economics problem. |
But you condemn capitalism - an economic system - for these political problems.
quote: It's only exploitation by the state if the state is corrupt. |
Nice double standard, if the state pays me a fee to fix cars, that's okay if the state isn't corrupt (yeah, states are rarely corrupt). But if my neighbor pays me to fix his car, then that is exploitation...... Because my neighbor is corrupt?
quote: Appearantly you think that it would be moral for Berzerker to require that I work for him since he 'owned' the island. |
Kid, imagine my hypothetical of you and me alone in the world. If you build yourself a life and I walk up and start grabbing your things, would you really call me moral? Of course not, so why is it moral for you to walk up and start grabbing things from my island?
quote: Nope, just freedom from those who would impose rule over us. Isn't that freedom? |
You wouldn't be imposing rule over us? Sounds like you have most of my economic life firmly in the grasp of Kidocracy. Freedom is the absence of coercion or constraint on choice or action. You have plenty of constraints waiting to be imposed on me under your ideology.
quote: Corruption is never ok. That doesn't mean that a usage fee us corrupt or exploitive. It would be only in the case where some one in the govt were using it for their own personal purposes, and that's a specific, unrelated case. |
What if they do it for your purposes?
quote: There's no ruler if everyone is equal. Rulers are those who impose a system for their own benefit, not the benefit of everyone. |
No rulers under Communism? Castro ring a bell? How does Communsim benefit everyone? Seems like just about every communist system rose to power by spilling lots of blood.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:18
|
|
Kid - quote: To survive and be my own man. And why not? If you want to exploit me then screw you. If you want me to die, then screw you too. |
Can you just address the question in my hypothetical? Would I be moral if I walked up and started grabbing the stuff you made? And why would I want you to die? I'd want you to leave and would even give you a ride to a neighboring island.
quote: If you had a good point, you wouldn't need such long winded posts. |
I can't have good points to counter your bad points? The point being that all I'm doing is responding to you, so if my posts are longwinded, it's because A) you have a highly flawed ideology B) your longwinded C) both.
quote: btw, I didn't present my program here for analysis. |
Where do you think you are?
quote: There's a topic here remember. You're just using this opportunity to push your morality on me, and very relentlessly I might say. More relentlessly than I prefer to tolerate actually. |
That's just my nature, I was born to exploit people. Oops, I'm one of the exploited... No wait...Umm... is there a third option?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|