Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Red Cross: Torture at Gitmo
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (6): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 12:09 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#91 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Another at confusing the Times of London with the Guardian.

Incidentally, I don't think I've posted a Guardian article in a long, long time. I'd be curious to see all of these Guardian articles that I've recently been reprinting.

And for clarification, the initial article of this thread was taken from the New York Times. Also, not the same thing as the Guardian.

Last edited by Ramo on 08-12-2004 at 12:41

notyoueither is offline notyoueither
Deity
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 12:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#92 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

The FBI is an unreliable source?

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 12:21 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#93 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Of course. So is the CIA. They're all in league with the radical firebrands that make up the Times of London to bring down the US government.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 16:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#94 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War

Adopted on 12 August 1949 by the Diplomatic Conference for the Establishment of
International Conventions for the Protection of Victims of War, held in Geneva

from 21 April to 12 August, 1949

entry into force 21 October 1950


I just read through the entire Geneva Convention and following articles cought my attention.

Regarding who is a POW and whos not the Geneva convention is pretty specific:


quote:
Article 4

A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the power of the enemy:

1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces.

2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions:

(a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;

(b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;

(c) That of carrying arms openly;

(d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.

3. Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a government or an authority not recognized

by the Detaining Power.

4. Persons who accompany the armed forces without actually being members thereof, such as civilian members of military aircraft crews, war correspondents, supply contractors, members of labour units or of services responsible for the welfare of the armed forces, provided that they have received authorization from the armed forces which they accompany, who shall provide them for that purpose with an identity card similar to the annexed model.

5. Members of crews, including masters, pilots and apprentices, of the merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law.

6. Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.


Therefore, the so-called "Enemy Combatant" is not a valid legal term and actually refers to someone who should have a POW status. Period.


quote:
Article 7

Prisoners of war may in no circumstances renounce in part or in entirety the rights secured to them by the present Convention, and by the special agreements referred to in the foregoing Article, if such there be.


This is why the whole Guantanamo is not just completely illegal but in stark contrast with the convention.

The Geneva Convention, about torture:

quote:
Article 13

Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated. Any unlawful act or omission by the Detaining Power causing death or seriously endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited, and will be regarded as a serious breach of the present Convention. In particular, no prisoner of war may be subjected to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are not justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the prisoner concerned and carried out in his interest.

Likewise, prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity.

Measures of reprisal against prisoners of war are prohibited.

Article 14

Prisoners of war are entitled in all circumstances to respect for their persons and their honour. Women shall be treated with all the regard due to their sex and shall in all cases benefit by treatment as favourable as that granted to men. Prisoners of war shall retain the full civil capacity which they enjoyed at the time of their capture. The Detaining Power may not restrict the exercise, either within or without its own territory, of the rights such capacity confers except in so far as the captivity requires.

Article 15

The Power detaining prisoners of war shall be bound to provide free of charge for their maintenance and for the medical attention required by their state of health.

Article 17
....

....

No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted, or exposed to any unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind.
.....

Article 87

Prisoners of war may not be sentenced by the military authorities and courts of the Detaining Power to any penalties except those provided for in respect of members of the armed forces of the said Power who have committed the same acts.

When fixing the penalty, the courts or authorities of the Detaining Power shall take into consideration, to the widest extent possible, the fact that the accused, not being a national of the Detaining Power, is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance, and that he is in its power as the result of circumstances independent of his own will. The said courts or authorities shall be at liberty to reduce the penalty provided for the violation of which the prisoner of war is accused, and shall therefore not be bound to apply the minimum penalty prescribed.

Collective punishment for individual acts, corporal punishments, imprisonment in premises without daylight and, in general, any form of torture or cruelty, are forbidden.


Article 89

The disciplinary punishments applicable to prisoners of war are the following:
.....
.....
.....

4. Confinement.

.....

In no case shall disciplinary punishments be inhuman, brutal or dangerous to the health of prisoners of war.

Article 130

Grave breaches to which the preceding Article relates shall be those involving any of the following acts, if committed against persons or property protected by the Convention: wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, compelling a prisoner of war to serve in the forces of the hostile Power, or wilfully depriving a prisoner of war of the rights of fair and regular trial prescribed in this Convention.


http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm

DinoDoc is offline DinoDoc
Emperor
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999
time: 23:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 19:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#95 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by laurentius
Therefore, the so-called "Enemy Combatant" is not a valid legal term and actually refers to someone who should have a POW status. Period.
You've laid out a fairly convincing case for the Taliban fighters but I fail to see anything that covers the Al Qaeda fighters.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 19:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#96 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Well you know DinoDoc tecnically the so-called "War on Terror" is not a war at all. Ok, the part that took place in Afghanistan was a war but anything else is just an international police operation. Therefore the Al-Qaeda operatives are not "fighters" at all but something very different. Criminals, perhaps. And there are different laws used in civil justice. The alledged Al-Qaeda operatives should not be in Gitmo in te first place. They should be given fair trial in their own countries or at least in some civil court somewhere.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 19:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#97 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

You know perhaps you should try them in Afghanistan with Taliban laws since thats where they were captured and those were at the time the effective laws of Afghanistan

Boris Godunov is offline Boris Godunov
King
Portland, OR
Aug 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 20:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#98 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
So people demand that we release people at Gitmo and we return them to the country which they are citizens of and people still aren't happy? Some of you people will never be happy and will whine about everything. All without any evidence that people are being systemitically mistreated.


This "la la la," cover-your-ears, I-can't-hear-you routine is old. Just admit you'll never accept that there's torture going on, no matter how much evidence is presented.

I don't want the Gitmo prisoners released out of hand. I want them to stop torturing prisoners, first. Then I want to see fair trials for them, since only 4 out of 550 have actually even been charged with anything. And then let justice be dispensed.

But beating the **** out of them isn't doing anything but engendering more animosity to the U.S. every day.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 20:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#99 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Ramo
quote:
Ramo: How does the law you linked to define the term?


quote:
As used in this chapter—
(1) “torture” means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control;
(2) “severe mental pain or suffering” means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from—
(A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;
(B) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;
(C) the threat of imminent death; or
(D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality;


http://assembler.law.cornell.edu/us...40----000-.html

Sure seems to fit.


By that definition, simply having the death penalty for murder tortures everyone in the US into not killing people

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:05 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#100 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length



That's an absurd interpretation. And the Courts certainly haven't intepreted the law (and it is the law) that way.

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:06 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#101 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

Specifically, executing people doesn't threaten anyone with imminent death.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#102 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
(C) the threat of imminent death;


It's absurd to interpret that as meaning you can't threaten to kill people if they don't comply?

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:08 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#103 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
quote:
(C) the threat of imminent death;


It's absurd to interpret that as meaning you can't threaten to kill people if they don't comply?


No it isn't. That's what it says. The DP, in the U.S., is not an imminent threat of death. There is this little thing called due process which has to take place first.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#104 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

OK. Well, I guess we can't shoot escaping prisoners then, else they'd be tortured into staying.

Arrian is offline Arrian
Emperor
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#105 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Boris Godunov


This "la la la," cover-your-ears, I-can't-hear-you routine is old. Just admit you'll never accept that there's torture going on, no matter how much evidence is presented.

I don't want the Gitmo prisoners released out of hand. I want them to stop torturing prisoners, first. Then I want to see fair trials for them, since only 4 out of 550 have actually even been charged with anything. And then let justice be dispensed.

But beating the **** out of them isn't doing anything but engendering more animosity to the U.S. every day.


Boris.

-Arrian

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:12 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#106 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

And you're missing the pre-condition:
(2) “severe mental pain or suffering” means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from—

It's torture to constantly threaten a person with death every day for a month. Similarly, it's torture to kill people in extremely painful ways.

Killing people is not necessarily torture by the Federal Anti-Torture Statute.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#107 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

What if I say "I'll kill you if you run away"?

What if I say "I'll kill you if you don't talk"?

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:25 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#108 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

I don't know about the first, but the second meets the pre-condition IMO. I don't know much about torture law, so I can't tell you for sure.

What's your point?

the_ceebs is offline the_ceebs
Settler

Jan 2003
time: 05:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#109 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Dinodoc you said

quote:
You've laid out a fairly convincing case for the Taliban fighters but I fail to see anything that covers the Al Qaeda fighters.


Now the geneva convention says

quote:
6. Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.


It could be argued that Al Quaida fall under this section of the geneva convention

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#110 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

I dont agree. Al-Qaeda operatives seldom "carry arms openly" or "respect the laws and customs of war".

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#111 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote:
Originally posted by Ramo
I don't know about the first, but the second meets the pre-condition IMO. I don't know much about torture law, so I can't tell you for sure.

What's your point?


That it's absurd.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#112 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Saying "I'll kill you if you don't talk" continually (and meaning it) isn't psychological torture? What planet did you come from?

Gibsie is offline Gibsie
Emperor
all over the proverbial shop
Jan 1970
time: 05:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#113 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Yes, the very notion that the US tortures people in any way is absurd, as is the notion that it'd be wrong to do it, and that they deserve to be treated with some humanity. It's all absurd!

Hurricane is offline Hurricane
Warlord
Arctic Hill
May 2001
time: 07:18
  Old Post 08-12-2004 23:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#114 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Telling a suspect that he will be killed unless he talks is definitely illegal in all Western European countries. I would expect it is so in the US, too, but then again, who knows.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#115 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Saying "I'll kill you if you don't talk" continually (and meaning it) isn't psychological torture? What planet did you come from?


By their wording, saying "The guards will shoot you if you're escaping" is torture.

Which is, btw, absurd.

Ogie Oglethorpe is offline Ogie Oglethorpe
King
Marietta, GA
Dec 1999
time: 05:18
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#116 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
OK. Well, I guess we can't shoot escaping prisoners then, else they'd be tortured into staying.


Incarceration is torture if one decides to torture the definition.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:18
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#117 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Why is this all so absurd to some people? Torture is not absurd, even if its conducted by Gods chosen people, the Americans.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#118 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote:
Originally posted by laurentius
Why is this all so absurd to some people? Torture is not absurd, even if its conducted by Gods chosen people, the Americans.




My point is that the definition of torture you've espoused is so broad that it labels acts that clearly are NOT torture as torture - i.e., it's absurd.

I could say "brown stuff is pollution", and it certainly would be true of some brown stuff, maybe even a lot of brown stuff, but it's still an absurd definition.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:18
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#119 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

What is absurd about the GC? The only absurd thing is the new term the American media has come up with, "torture lite"

There are some very simple rules everyone must follow. There is no "grey" zone. What is happening in Gitmo is simply criminal and anyone working there should be tried in Hague.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#120 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon



quote:
(1) “torture” means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control;
(2) “severe mental pain or suffering” means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from—
(A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;
(B) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;
(C) the threat of imminent death; or
(D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality;


I'm pointing out that this definition of torture (I'm pretty sure it's not from the GC, btw) is absurd because it includes things that clearly aren't torture.

 
Pages (6): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18.
Apolyton Time is 00:18.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0718 seconds (91.51% PHP - 8.49% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net