 |
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
[RANT]
A major problem with the way we handle pollution in this country is that we deal with the effects decades down the road, instead of enforcing strict controls on current operations.
Result? Cleanup required. Cleanups are hideously expensive, and there are other complications. Often, the original polluting entity is gone. Insurance records (to the extent those are applicable, but that's a whole 'nother matter) are often incomplete or totally missing.
Before you even clean a contaminated site up, you have to delineate the extent of the contamination. Once you've done that (Preliminary Investigation), you do a Remedial Investigation (more in-depth) and then a Feasibility Study (ok, here are 2-3 methods we can use to clean this up, and here's what it should cost). Then you debate/haggle over which method to use. THEN, once you've dealt with all of that, you get started.
I cannot tell you how many sites I've seen where the contamination was discovered and pretty well understood 15 years ago, and they still haven't started cleanup!
It's bassackwards, damnit! Controls + incentives. Go after pollution at its source (aggressively!), not after the fact.[/Rant]
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
im not talking about feudal social structure. im talking about the hopi. the neighboring bands as you all them, were like seperate nations for us today, therefore i dont see how it affects their society where everyone knew everyone else, as opposed to todays. |
Not everyone in Hopi society knew everyone else. Not everyone in societies of traveling bands knew everyone else. Not all North American Indians lived in traveling bands. The Chippewa were a huge nation who always left half their rice fall back into the water as a tribute to the rice, which also, they knew, ensured that there would be more rice next year.
And, as I have repeated pointed out, today's society is manufactured. We don't know each other because we don't bother to get to know each other. We are overworked, so we don't have time to build community. We are distracted by consumerism. Hell, families barely know each other, let alone neighbors, or the guy who lives on another block. This isn't just because we have a large society. Europeans have large societies too, and they aren't as short-sighted and greedy as Americans. We are this way because we have been taught to be this way because it is more profitable to be this way.
Since I can point to significant parts of human history and society where people have not been short-sighted and greedy, it is not a universal charaterisitic of humanity, and therefore it is not part of human nature.
Game, set, match.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: We are distracted by consumerism. Hell, families barely know each other, let alone neighbors, or the guy who lives on another block. This isn't just because we have a large society. Europeans have large societies too, and they aren't as short-sighted and greedy as Americans. |
Oh, please. 
As a student of History, it is pretty clear that humans have always been shortsighted, greedy little buggers. I *might* grant you that our society is marginally worse than others, but only marginally.
Your comments re: "harmonious with nature" Indian societies don't carry much weight with me, primarily because those societies ultimately failed, but also because I honestly don't think we know enough about them (not much history available for review) to state with certainty that they were really any less short-sighted than we. Greed I'll grant you.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
It's not an easy question, by any stretch.
Obviously, the electorate has to demand long-term strategy, and punish politicians who are short-sighted by not re-electing them. But how do we get there?
-Arrian |
Its tough. More information on long term goals might help but I think that most people will remain more concerned about the economy NOW than even the economy 15 years from now.
But there are examples where people have grudgingly accepted short term pain in the name of a long etrm benefit. The government cutbacks in Canada in the 80s are an example-=-Although painful and fought vehemently by some, you did see a significant portion of the population accepting the short term pain in the name of long-term fiscal health
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
It's not an easy question, by any stretch.
Obviously, the electorate has to demand long-term strategy, and punish politicians who are short-sighted by not re-electing them. But how do we get there?
-Arrian |
Its tough. More information on long term goals might help but I think that most people will remain more concerned about the economy NOW than even the economy 15 years from now.
But there are examples where people have grudgingly accepted short term pain in the name of a long etrm benefit. The government cutbacks in Canada in the 80s are an example-=-Although painful and fought vehemently by some, you did see a significant portion of the population accepting the short term pain in the name of long-term fiscal health
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|