Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > The torture thread!
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (5): [ 1   2   3   4   5   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#61 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by MikeH
Yes, that doesn't mean we can't be bound by newer more strict rules AS WELL. No-one's saying that the new rules break the GC, only that they enhance it.

What's so hard to understand about that? The US signed up to both and has to follow both.


You're right in that the laws most likely should be modernized though I believe the UN treaty does an exeedingly poor job of defining terms. The GC is very clear however. When conflicts arise it wins both treaties define torture differently so it is clearly a conflict.

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#62 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by Ramo
quote:

Not at all. The GC only covers warring parties in armed conflict.


Eh? Peace treaties cover warring parties in armed conflicts.

If the GC are the only laws that govern the state of war, then Peace Treates are illegal. So are Declarations of War.


Not at all since peace treaties end wars and do not dictate the laws of war. The GC does define the laws of war so there is no conflict.

MikeH is offline MikeH
Emperor
Ming on rakastajani
May 1999
time: 05:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:21 Visit MikeH's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#63 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Not really, take the superset of both. If either of them defines it as torture it's torture. Simple.

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:27 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#64 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Not at all since peace treaties end wars and do not dictate the laws of war. The GC does define the laws of war so there is no conflict.


Of course they dictate the law of war. Specifically, they make war between two states illegal.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#65 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
The Genevea Convention is very clear. It is the "supreme law of war" and when ever other "treaties, proclamations, agreements, or national laws" conflict with it the Geneva Convention wins during wars or armed conflicts.


I'm reading the GC of 1949 and no where does it say it is the supreme law of war and overrides anything that comes after it. In fact that would be highly suspect for a convention to bind all future conventions.

And no international lawyer, AFAIC, follows your interpretation.

So if you can point me to where it says supreme law of war, applying to anything coming to the future.

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:35 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#66 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
When conflicts arise it wins both treaties define torture differently so it is clearly a conflict.


The GC calls certain certain acts under certain circumstances torture and prohibits them, the Convention Against Torture does the same, the Federal Anti-Torture Statute does the same. There's no contradiction. All of these actions are illegal; that they all call these actions under these circumstances the same thing is irrelevent.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#67 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

Btw, here is the treaty:

http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm

Can you point out the word "supreme" for me. Or anything that indicates that it is the final word and all future conflicts are to be decided solely by the GC?

MikeH is offline MikeH
Emperor
Ming on rakastajani
May 1999
time: 05:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:39 Visit MikeH's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#68 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Was Oerdin a US Army PR guy?

Was it part of his job to contradict things like this?

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:41
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#69 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Mike, probably. There is nothing in the Geneva Convention that says it is supreme over LATER Conventions. And, indeed, the UN did not acceed to that interpretation when creating the Convention Against Torture, which has a provision saying that it applies during wartime!

MikeH is offline MikeH
Emperor
Ming on rakastajani
May 1999
time: 05:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:43 Visit MikeH's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#70 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Well I can't be bothered to argue with him about it anymore then. You've convinced my my interpretation was right and now I have more facts to back that up. CASE CLOSED!

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 21:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#71 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Gibsie is offline Gibsie
Emperor
all over the proverbial shop
Jan 1970
time: 05:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#72 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

The GC by definition, according to Oerdin does not apply to unlawful combatants, and my thinking may be a little blurred, but if there are laws concerning lawful combatants that don't apply to unlawful combatants, then the laws that apply generally and are "overruled" by the GC must therefore apply to the unlawful combatants if nobody else.

It's like saying a law about animal cruelty doesn't count because more important laws say that you can't charge a man with assault for beating a dog ( <-- if that makes you go "what the hell is that idiot talking about?!", Oerdin, then bear in mind that is the quality of the argument you're presenting)

Last edited by Gibsie on 08-12-2004 at 22:10

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#73 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Look, the term "unlawful combatant" is a made-up term and has absolutely no legal value of any kind. The taliban fighters are obviously regular militias/soldiers and are therefore covered by the GC.

St Leo is offline St Leo
King of Scenario League
Member of the Apolyton Social Democratic Party
Jul 2005
time: 00:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:08 Visit St Leo<br><img src=/forums/images/staff-icon.gif>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#74 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
December 06, 2004
TORTURE USA

The Lubyanka Prison’s heavy oak main door swung open. I went in, the first western journalist to enter the KGB’s notorious Moscow headquarters, a place so dreaded Russians dared not utter its name. When they referred to it at all, they called it `Detsky Mir,’ after a nearby toy store.

After interviewing two senior KGB generals, I explored the fascinating museum of Soviet intelligence and was briefed on special poisons and assassination weapons that left no traces. I sat transfixed at the desk used by all the directors of Stalin’s secret police, on which the orders were signed to murder 30 million people.

Descending dimly lit stairs, I saw some of the KGB’s execution and torture cellars, and special `cold rooms’ where naked prisoners were beaten, then doused with ice water and slowly frozen.

Other favored Lubyanka tortures: psychological terror, psychotropic drugs, prolonged sleep deprivation, dazzling lights, intense noise, days in pitch blackness, isolation, humiliation, constant threats, savage beatings, attacks by guard dogs, near drowning.

Nightmares from the past….but the past has returned.

According to report just leaked to the `NY Times,’ the Swiss-based International Red Cross has accused the Bush Administration for a second time of employing systematic, medically supervised torture against suspects at its Devil’s Island at Guantanamo, and at US-run prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The second Red Cross report was delivered to the White House last summer while it was trying to dismiss the Abu Ghraib prison torture horrors in Iraq as the crimes of a few rogue jailers.

Many tortures perfected by the Cheka ( Soviet secret police), notably beating, freezing, sensory disorientation, and sleep deprivation, are now routinely being used by US interrogators on Muslim suspects.

The Chekisti, however, did not usually inflict sexual humiliations. That technique, and hooding, were developed by Israeli psychologists to break resistance of Palestinian prisoners.
Photos of sexual humiliation were used by Israeli security, and then by US interrogators at Abu Ghraib, to blackmail Muslim prisoners into becoming informers.

All of these practices flagrantly violate the Geneva Conventions, international, and American law. The Pentagon and CIA’s secret gulag in Cuba, Iraq and Afghanistan has become a sort of Enron-style, off-the-books operation, immune from American law or Congressional oversight.

Suspects simply disappear into a black hole, recalling Latin America’s torture camps and `disappearings’ of the 1970’s and 80’s, or the Arab World’s sinister secret police prisons.

The US has been sending high-level anti-American suspects to Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and, reportedly, Pakistan, where they are brutally tortured with violent electric shocks, savage beatings, drowning, acid baths, and blowtorching – the same tortures, ironically, ascribed to Saddam Hussein.

Protests over these crimes by members of Congress, respected human rights groups, and the public have been ignored. President George W. Bush just named Alberto Gonzales to be Attorney General, the nation’s highest law officer. As White House counsel, Gonzales wrote briefs justifying torture and advised the White House on ways to evade or ignore the Geneva Conventions – both violations of US law.

Grossly violating the Geneva Conventions undermines international law and endangers US troops abroad. Anyone who has served in the US armed forces, as I have, should be outraged that this painfully-won tenet of international law and civilized behavior is being trashed by the Bush Administration.

If, as Bush claims, terrorism suspects, Taliban, and Muslim mujihadin fighters deserve no protected under the laws of war because they wear no uniforms, or are `illegal combatants,’ and may be jailed and tortured at presidential whim, then what law protects from abuse or torture all the un-uniformed US Special Forces, CIA field teams, and those 40,000 or more US and British mercenaries in Iraq and Afghanistan euphemistically called `civilian contractors?’

Behaving like the 1930’s Soviet secret police will not make America safer. Such illegal, immoral and totally un-American behavior corrupts democracy and makes us no better than the criminals we detest.

The 20th century has shown repeatedly that when security forces use torture abroad, they soon begin using it at home, first on suspected `terrorists,’ then, dissidents, then on ordinary suspects.

It’s time Congress and the courts wake up and end this deeply shameful and dangerous episode in America’s history.

Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2004


I wish he'd stop bashing Israel in every column, but this is good stuff otherwise.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#75 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by laurentius
Look, the term "unlawful combatant" is a made-up term and has absolutely no legal value of any kind. The taliban fighters are obviously regular militias/soldiers and are therefore covered by the GC.


Besides the fact that the GC specifically says they aren't?

Gibsie is offline Gibsie
Emperor
all over the proverbial shop
Jan 1970
time: 05:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#76 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Very well, if they specifically aren't covered by the GC, then they are covered by any of the other treaties on torture that don't make a disctinction between lawful and unlawful combatants. Can't have it both ways.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 22:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#77 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by Kuciwalker


Besides the fact that the GC specifically says they aren't?


I quoted the GC in the Gitmo thread, It specifically says that they are.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 23:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#78 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Article 4

A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the power of the enemy:

1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces.

2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions:

(a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;

(b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;

(c) That of carrying arms openly;

(d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.

3. Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a government or an authority not recognized

by the Detaining Power.

4. Persons who accompany the armed forces without actually being members thereof, such as civilian members of military aircraft crews, war correspondents, supply contractors, members of labour units or of services responsible for the welfare of the armed forces, provided that they have received authorization from the armed forces which they accompany, who shall provide them for that purpose with an identity card similar to the annexed model.

5. Members of crews, including masters, pilots and apprentices, of the merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law.

6. Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 23:06 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#79 Report this post to a moderator
Re: The torture thread! Remove this text

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
I have decided that forcing children to wear shoes is torture so I will now run around writting articles and posting threads declaring that all the countries of the first and second world are torturing their children. I realize that international laws do not back up my basesless claims but I shall never the less insist on calling every parent who makes their children wear shoes a torturer.

DOWN WITH THE TORTURERS!


MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 23:09 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#80 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui


Obviously, you do not know how to use the thumbs correctly, with the smilies.

correct way:

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 08-12-2004 23:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#81 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Anything else MrFun?

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#82 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by laurentius
I quoted the GC in the Gitmo thread, It specifically says that they are.


AQ doesn't wear uniforms, etc...

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#83 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

The thing you quoted defined POW's. I don't see how AQ is included in it.

Hurricane is offline Hurricane
Warlord
Arctic Hill
May 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#84 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

Let's for a moment assume that the prisoners at Gitmo without a doubt weren't covered by the GC: would it then be ok to torture them?

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#85 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Yeah and you quoted my reply about Taleban fighter, not AQ operatives. Theres a difference between those two things, see?

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#86 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

conceded.

However, not all of those at Gitmo are Taliban fighters. Some are AQ.

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#87 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

yeah and the AQ operatives shouldnt be there in the first place IMO. They are not fighters since the "War on Terror" is technically and legally not a war at all, but a series of police & security force operations. The AQ suspects should be tried fairly in civil courts.

The international Criminal Court would be exellent for this but ironically America opposes it. Pretty dumb huh?

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#88 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Who's claimed that the WoT is an actual war? And why should AQ operatives be tried in civil courts?

laurentius is offline laurentius
King
Helsinki, Finland
Jun 2001
time: 07:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:41
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#89 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Because if WoT is NOT a real war you cant be talking about "AQ fighters" as a military force. If theres no war, then its a matter of civil courts to try international criminal. Remember the Jackal? He is an international "terrorist" or whatever and he was trien in civil court, got a fair trial, got what 200 years. What are you afraid of? Not having enough evidence? Then you have to let them go? You understand what I'm saying? If a person isnt POW, you either charge him or let him go.

And in western democracies military tribunals are only used against military personnel. You dont wanna look like one of those "junta" states do you?

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:17
  Old Post 09-12-2004 00:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#90 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Because if WoT is NOT a real war you cant be talking about "AQ fighters" as a military force. If theres no war, then its a matter of civil courts to try international criminal.


The war in Afghanistan is a real war. The AQ people were fighting against us in Afghanistan. They just aren't PoW's under the GC, so they don't get any of those protections.

 
Pages (5): [ 1   2   3   4   5   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.
Apolyton Time is 00:17.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0655 seconds (90.80% PHP - 9.20% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net