 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
I understand all of it. It is very direct and clear. Very little room for interpretation actually. The question is how do you understand it. |
You really do dwell in a bizarro universe, don't you? Just as you say, it's very direct and clear. How do you not see the same thing as the rest of us?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
Oh and I liked Spiffor's answer as well. The people that really like being a student will always find one more program or issue to study. Are some central planners going to decree that that the doctoral thesis must be done in 18 months-- After all the professors will always support continuing study since if they have no students prehaps they don't get to keep being a professor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
O M G!
I can not support you in any kind of political pursuit that you have. You have no justification for overthrowing the current rulers just so that you can set up your own little rule. You scare me. |
No, I have a different justification for overthrowing our current rulers, which is that they misrule. If they were capable of providing a stable economy and a decent standard of living for all without the periodic crises to which capitalism is subject, there would be no point in overthrowing them. This is the fundimental core of Marxism. It is not the capitalism is unfair, it is that capitalism is insane.
quote: Ah, no. It would be the same as it is today. They would vote with their pocket book. |
Society would vote, not the doctors. Presumably we'd have people like you providing data for us to make an informed decision as to how we should reward them.
quote: As shocked as I am that you can misinterpret Marx, maybe you don't like Orwell because it would be harder to fit your own desires into it, and use it for political propaganda purposes. |
As for Orwell, I didn't say I didn't like him. I think he's a fine author and I like his work, at least until he began ratting out other leftists, and 1984 is still pretty good. Be that as it may, he doesn't supplant Marx and Lenin and others.
quote: Yes, we have already agree upon that. You were going to show me where Marx said that doctors should be compensated beyond the cost of their education. You haven't done that. |
I think part of your problem is the fact that I didn't sufficiently distinguish when I was writing about socialism and when I was writing about communism. In socialism, many of the market's mechanisms will still be in operation. Thus during this period, docotors will still be compensated according to supply and demand, in addition to the increased cost of their labor due to their training. In The State and Revolution, Lenin limits wage differentials to five times the lowest pay scale. When inheritence taxes are included, this prevents the rise of a new class.
When society becomes so productive that wages become meaningless, we will have reached communism. Doctors will still probably recieve greater social rewards for their labor, but it won't take the form of money.
quote: His argument is a MORAL argument. |
Ah, no. His argument is that capitalism is irrational and unplanned and that it is insane for humans to be the slave of a mechanism they created (the market). While he makes moral arguments, they are to support his philosophical argument. You put the cart before the horse when you make moral arguments your chief arguments.
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 15-12-2004 at 02:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
You previously said that people would not become doctors if they didn't get paid more. Did you mean they wouldn't become doctors if their education was fully paid and they still didn't get paid more? That's what we're talking about. |
If their education was fully paid, many people would become doctors over manual labour. But there is the (strong) risk that the huge majority of people will avoid manual labour altogether, and study for the most interesting jobs, that will match their vocation. It will result in an overload of people in some kinds of job, while many other jobs will find very little people wanting to do them (repetitive unskilled manual labour, but also obscure or unattractive skilled jobs).
In France, where university is basically free and where most students are supported by their parents, we have this problem already, with some courses such as sports and psychology being overwhelmed. And still, France is a capitalist country where most students know they have to pick a cursus that will lead to an actual job, because of the financial pressure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kidicious
|
 |
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003 time: 21:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
O M G!
I can not support you in any kind of political pursuit that you have. You have no justification for overthrowing the current rulers just so that you can set up your own little rule. You scare me. |
No, I have a different justification for overthrowing our current rulers, which is that they misrule. If they were capable of providing a stable economy and a decent standard of living for all without the periodic crises to which capitalism is subject, there would be no point in overthrowing them. This is the fundimental core of Marxism. It is not the capitalism is unfair, it is that capitalism is insane.
|
So you must disagree with Marx when he claims that the workers have a moral claim to their labor, and that they are justified in revolt. That really explains why you think that some people whould be given advantage in your state capitalist state.
quote:
quote: Ah, no. It would be the same as it is today. They would vote with their pocket book. |
Society would vote, not the doctors.
|
Society is just a bunch of self-interested individuals. What the hell? Who is going to vote exactly? The doctors are not going to vote? 
quote:
quote: As shocked as I am that you can misinterpret Marx, maybe you don't like Orwell because it would be harder to fit your own desires into it, and use it for political propaganda purposes. |
As for Orwell, I didn't say I didn't like him. I think he's a fine author and I like his work, at least until he began ratting out other leftists, and 1984 is still pretty good. Be that as it may, he doesn't supplant Marx and Lenin and others.
|
Yes, exactly what I thought. Animal Farm is a threat to your world view. Incidentally, the book is not an attack on Marxism, but only an attack on your kind of 'communism'.
quote:
quote: Yes, we have already agree upon that. You were going to show me where Marx said that doctors should be compensated beyond the cost of their education. You haven't done that. |
I think part of your problem is the fact that I didn't sufficiently distinguish when I was writing about socialism and when I was writing about communism. In socialism, many of the market's mechanisms will still be in operation. Thus during this period, docotors will still be compensated according to supply and demand, in addition to the increased cost of their labor due to their training. In The State and Revolution, Lenin limits wage differentials to five times the lowest pay scale. When inheritence taxes are included, this prevents the rise of a new class.
When society becomes so productive that wages become meaningless, we will have reached communism. Doctors will still probably recieve greater social rewards for their labor, but it won't take the form of money.
|
I don't care about Lenin. Stick to Marx. If you claim Leninism fine. In this discussion let's stick to Marx. And I am not what you call a socialist, but maybe you want to tell me how that brand of 'communism' is compatable with Marxism.
quote:
quote: His argument is a MORAL argument. |
Ah, no. His argument is that capitalism is irrational and unplanned and that it is insane for humans to be the slave of a mechanism they created (the market). While he makes moral arguments, they are to support his philosophical argument. You put the cart before the horse when you make moral arguments your chief arguments. |
He doesn't just make moral arguments to support his philisophical claims. Jeez, you are just calling him a bullshitter. How could he justify the overthrow of a classist sytem and justify another class system. That's incredible to think of you believing that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
dp
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kidicious
|
 |
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003 time: 21:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
If their education was fully paid, many people would become doctors over manual labour. But there is the (strong) risk that the huge majority of people will avoid manual labour altogether, and study for the most interesting jobs, that will match their vocation. It will result in an overload of people in some kinds of job, while many other jobs will find very little people wanting to do them (repetitive unskilled manual labour, but also obscure or unattractive skilled jobs).
In France, where university is basically free and where most students are supported by their parents, we have this problem already, with some courses such as sports and psychology being overwhelmed. And still, France is a capitalist country where most students know they have to pick a cursus that will lead to an actual job, because of the financial pressure. |
It's very difficult to talk to you about this when you are assuming a free market.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|