 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
St Leo
|
 |
Member of the Apolyton Social Democratic Party
Jul 2005 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
Sorry Linux fans, I think your OS sucks. |
Bite me.
quote: I want an OS that will be completely compatible with everything Windows is compatible with. |
Having read The Old New Thing for some time, no. For example, The Importance of Error Code Backwards Compatibility will blow your mind.
Windows is compatible with some utter crap. For example, most things released for Windows won't work with an XP Restricted User. Many won't work with an XP Power User. In other words, they are either crap or doubly crap.
It's like HTML. Because Microsoft intentionally accomodates idiots who can't code worth ****, they can't fix bugs that those idiots code around. Therefore, Windows is irrevocably buggy and unfixable.
quote: I want to be able to play all my games on this system. Will such an alternative to Windows ever exist? Or are we doomed to be subordinate to Microsoft? |
Fortunately, if Microsoft has its way, everyone will be playing games on crippled hardware like PS2 and XBox and this will cease to be a concern.
quote: I'm asking this because I'm currently installing a new version of Windows. I tried to upgrade my copy of Windows XP Pro with Service Pack 2... big mistake. It completely screwed up my copy of Windows. Now I'm stuck installing it over again because of this. I'm going to have to reinstall all of my programs and games.  |
SP2 is generally a waste of time. I had my own problems with it because a DLL that Nero loaded on startup crashed SP2. I had to do some DOS boot fixery.
quote: I want an alternative to Windows. Is there anything out there or on the horizon that looks promising? If not, will there ever be? |
Computer games are developed for whichever platform has the largest market share.
quote: I want a choice dammit. Or at least I want Windows to be better. |
Lobby for abolition of copyright and fork Windows into something good and incompatible with its current incarnation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ari Rahikkala
|
 |
Unreported loss of streaming in atomic read operation
Oct 1999 time: 07:29
|
|
(hmm, Leons already linked to The Old New Thing, it appears... well, that's what I get for taking so long to type these posts)
Well, you certainly made your opinions clear ...
quote: I want an OS that will be completely compatible with everything Windows is compatible with. I want to be able to play all my games on this system.
Will such an alternative to Windows ever exist? Or are we doomed to be subordinate to Microsoft? |
Have you ever read Raymond Chen's blog? The stuff that Microsoft has had to do to keep compatible with older versions of their own OSes is quite incredible. There are projects that attempt to reimplement Windows, natively and on top of other OSes, but they're hopelessly overwhelmed by the amount of quirks of the platform and will stay overwhelmed for the foreseeable future. Also, besides the fact that the amount of work required to reimplement Windows is so huge, there's the fact that any such project is rather controversial among geeks who would really rather get as far away from Win32 as possible...
quote: I hope that refers to a newer version of Gnome, because the one on some of the computers at my uni is bad enough you find yourself wishing you were using MSDOS 4.3 or something. |
Define "bad" . Also, which version is it? The way I understand GNOME's history, every geek loved the featureful 1.4, then absolutely everyone hated 2.0 and 2.2, and after that half of everyone has gradually started to learn to like the simpleness and the rest have hated the dumbing down of later versions...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: I also totally broke my Debian install some time ago, trying to install gaim (a simple instant messenger). It needed a newer version of gtk-runtime, so I installed that. But wait! Gnome doesn't work with that gtk-runtime! |
Like I said, you have terrible luck with Linux.
I'm running a server that's rock-solid on Gentoo Unstable (keyword ~x86) using mysql 4, php 5, apache 2, with gaim 1.1.2, fluxbox, kde, gnome, subversion, and so on... on kernel 2.6.10
Hasn't borked since install.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ari Rahikkala
|
 |
Unreported loss of streaming in atomic read operation
Oct 1999 time: 07:29
|
|
quote: Are you a user of Windows? How are you doing on your backups? Have you had the machine hold in the middle of backups, by any chance? Have you lost any data? Have things disappeared into strange part of your disk, or have you had to reinstall the operating system and lose track of all your settings?
Or are you a user of the Macintosh? One that is so simple and unreliable. No, rock-solid and uncomprehensible! So the beginning user puts something on the desktop, goes "OK, filed on sight... oops" and gets the full UNIX directory.
How about Linux? Oh, that's great. We have this wonderful command-line interface, or we have the GNOME thing with really nice, incomprehensible widgets that were designed as a dumb-down of the command-line interface (as distinguished from clarity).
Everything is designed either for people who need to know too much or for an imaginary stupid person. |
-- (partly misquoted - if something doesn't make sense, it's my fault) [url=http://xanadu.com.au/ted/]Ted Nelson on the usability of different operating systems, in a lecture about ZigZag that I wasn't able to find online...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Last Conformist
|
 |
of Calakmul
Jul 2003 time: 06:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ari Rahikkala
Define "bad" . Also, which version is it? The way I understand GNOME's history, every geek loved the featureful 1.4, then absolutely everyone hated 2.0 and 2.2, and after that half of everyone has gradually started to learn to like the simpleness and the rest have hated the dumbing down of later versions... |
I do not know what version it is. I would suppose one of the alter ones, since "featureful" isn't the word that pops into my mind when I think of it.
If making me long for MSDOS isn't the definition of bad, was is? I find the layout of menus etc counterintuitive. I really hate how much harder it is to hop around between various windows - there's no equivalent of Alt-Tab that I've found, and finding and remaximizing minimized windows is a pain. Icon listings in directories sometimes screw up on the screen.
That the tech staff has neutered everything neuterable doesn't help. There is, for instance, a fairly recent Mozilla browser installed, but the security settings are so insanely high - and they can apparently not be changed by mere users - that you're better off using the ancient Netscape version that's also provided (and which can be launched by a single click on the quicklaunch bar, while modern browser is burried in said counterintuitive menus).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|