 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
i had misgivings about the show from the start, but was willing to give it a chance.
after the first few continuity issues, though, i lost hope, and the writing, well... 
lost interest, and personally, i find it an abomination.
maybe as a standalone series, completely unattached to star trek, it would have done fine; but that rubbish being attached to star trek only hurt both franchises--the former having extraordinarily high standards to live up to, and the latter being marred by a shitty show.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
Too bad-- They lost points with me with all the temporal war crap but this season I was really starting to get intrigued by the internal pre-federation stuff-- I thought there was a lot of good basics for storylines on the interplay and relationships between the species
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Yep, they were doing quite well.
I mean that's really all they needed to do was work on that interplay you are talking about.
Thats when the Next Genreation was at its best was when the Federation got involved in the whole Klingon Civil War, etc. |
Agreed-- time travel and miracle technical saves are ok but get pretty tired ( I always wondered why if the engineer knew a way to triple the shields or double the phase cannon power they ONLY do it during a crisis and never have it set up that way in the first place LOL)
The best storylines to me are always about characters-- Iliked much of the mutant line and I have really liked how they have developed a few characters from other species over several episodes-- So in all I am sad to see it go-- with all the time they wasted on temporal stuff I will see this series largely as an opportunity wasted
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
are you guys serious they used time travel in Enterprise? They only just found out about it in TOS. I don't see how they could have figured out how to do it in Enterprise.
|
I don't recall them using TOS method of slingshotting but they had a LOT of storylines involving people from the federations future OR other species that could time-travel and they tended to fling the Enterprise all over the space-time continuum
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pyrodrew
|
|
StarTrek (Kirk) - saw most as a kid
StarTrek (Picard) - some, but Picard was disappointing
StarTrek (DeepSpace9) - rarely saw, zzzzzzzz
StarTrek (Voyager) - rarely saw, don't care if they ever made it home
StarTrek (Enterprise) - rarely saw, eh
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bkeela
|
 |
Brisbane, Australia
Oct 1999 time: 15:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
These are your arguments for longevity? Have you ever seen them? They're horrific crap!
I'm all for longevity, but when a show concept is so bereft of ideas that it descends into the crap that was Enterprise, it needs at least a rest, if not euthanasia. Churning out crap under a series name defames even the good parts of the series (Star Wars, anyone?).
There's a lot to be said for going out on a high note and leaving people with the fond memories of a great show rather than dragging a show out until it's unbearable. Some ideas just run their course and that's that. |
Those soap operas I mentioned are catered more for women, so of course you are going to think they are crap. I don't watch them either.
My point is that Star Trek can be sustained over a long period, without resorting to plots that force writers into creative dead ends. As already mentioned, there is a ton of drama that could be drawn from Human/Vulcan/Klingon relations, or just the mechanics of the Federation, and watching it form.
It seems to me that the producers of Enterprise, with poor ratings evident, got desperate and attempted to appeal to a young fan base. As a result, the more mature viewers were lost.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
This is news? I thought that it had been settled last year. In fact UPN plans to wait several years before trying another Star Trek series. They feel that their failure was due to oversaturation.
Personally I think that DS-9 was the best of the Star Trek series. It had the best plot line and the best characters. Particularily unique for the Star Trek genre was the fact that the "bad guys" were named individuals: Dukat, Kai Gwynn, Wayune the Horta, and the Founder he served. They appeared frequently enough that they were able to develop characters instead of being virtually nameless space monsters.
Here's a trekkie question for you: If you were going to have one person devote his or her life to you like you were a god who would it be: the unflinching toady Wayune or the relentlessly ruthless Kai Wynne?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Hooray!
It was PANTS...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|