 |
| |
|
|
nostromo
|
 |
Montréal, Québec
Mar 2002
time: 00:23
|
|
IE 7 will be coming sooner than anticipated. The beta will be out this summer.
quote:
SAN FRANCISCO--Reversing a longstanding Microsoft policy, Bill Gates said Tuesday that the company will ship an update to its browser separately from the next major version of Windows.
A beta, or test, version of Internet Explorer 7 will debut this summer, Microsoft's chairman and chief software architect said in a keynote address at the RSA Conference 2005 here. The company had said that it would not ship a new IE version before the next major update to Windows, code-named Longhorn, arrives next year.
In announcing the plan, Gates acknowledged something that many outside the company had been arguing for some time--that the browser itself has become a security risk.
"Browsing is definitely a point of vulnerability," Gates said.
The new browser version will work on machines running on Windows XP Service Pack 2, a security-focused update to the operating system that the company launched last summer, Gates said.
Mike Nash, an executive in Microsoft's security business and technology unit, said in an interview that Microsoft has not determined how or when the final version of IE 7 will ship, but that it is planned ahead of Longhorn.
Nash said it has not been decided whether IE 7 will come with a different Windows update, such as a security revamp.
"We'll be updating Windows on a regular basis," he said. "How the browser gets packaged--whether it's with a service pack--has not been nailed down. There is going to be a Service Pack 3 (of Windows XP). That's not a surprise. How that relates to (IE 7's release), we haven't figured out yet."
As recently as August, Microsoft said that no new stand-alone version was planned before Longhorn, and the company reiterated back then that its plan was to make new IE features available with major Windows releases. "At this time, there are no plans to release a new stand-alone version of IE," a Microsoft representative said.
Is Microsoft reacting to growing concerns about browser security, or does Firefox have it on the run? In November, Microsoft opened the door slightly to improving IE before Longhorn, though it indicated that improvements might come through add-ons to the browser, rather than through an updated version of IE.
Analysts attributed Microsoft's change of heart to the progress of the Mozilla Foundation's Firefox browser, which has made incremental but steady market share gains against IE in recent months. In a survey conducted late last year, Firefox nudged IE below the 90 percent mark for the first time since the height of the browser wars in the 1990s.
"I think it's a response to both the delay of Longhorn and the challenge of Firefox," said NPD Group analyst Ross Rubin, who added that Firefox was probably the sharper spur. "Were there no Firefox, they'd have more leeway to sit on it until Longhorn."
Bart Decrem, a founding member of the Mozilla Foundation, former head of its marketing and business development and current volunteer, said that Microsoft clearly was responding to the group's work. |
You can read the rest of the article
here
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999
time: 22:23
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
It's highly unlikely that MS would throw out the entire IE code and start from scratch, like what the Mozilla team has done. Which means that IE 7 is still going to be an ugly kludge.
However, I must give Mr Gates a  for acknowledging IE is a security risk. |
Are you kidding, UR? Look at the Mozilla codebase, a lot of it is leftover from Netscape.
Just not Gecko.
Javascript, for instance, is still from 4.x. As is the plugin infrastructure.
And incase you haven't noticed, most flaws aren't in the HTML parser anyway.
As much as I like Firefox, you can't point it to be an excellent example of security. There have been more Firefox flaws as late than IE flaws, it's just that Firefox's marketshare is smaller still, and not a big target.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Elok
|
 |
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003
time: 00:23
|
|
Isn't there a rather large cadre of cyber-dorks out there who make viruses for the specific purpose of thwarting and irritating Microsoft, just for spite? I know that sounds Fez-ian but it's what I've always heard, and given how rabid certain folks are against Gates it makes sense, or at least as much as anything having to do with viruses makes sense, anyway.
I just switched to Firefox. I rather like the totally free, doesn't try to take over your desktop, popup smashing, built-in googling aspects of it, and with all respect for your confidence in MS, Asher, I don't share that confidence. That wretched MS Word has lost/corrupted so many frigging files for myself and my family it's not even funny.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23.
Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-02-2005 01:25
though, i dislike ATi more because of their linux driver policy than anything.
. I mean, sure, if the people writing Mozilla had wanted their browser to become relevant in, say, 2014 they could have just thrown away all of the code that was opened up by Netscape, but they didn't so we got Firefox in 2004 instead 
|