 |
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
No - and I have had two family members in the military (my vision precluded me from flying, the only way I was willing to join). However, and I have over a shelf of standard US military manuals from pre-WW2 to the 1980's bought used for historical research - the military has a prescribed procedure for almost everything. Plus, and I made my point earlier - some of these are NOT techniques used by US law enforcement, even out-of-control law enforcement.
In addition they are behaviors consistant with the Gonzales memos. Now, let's examine this using Occam'
s Razor (or KISS, keep it simple stupid). Memos from the White House Counsel hair-splitting over torture and abuse. Widespread, systematic use in the US military-run prisions/Intelligence Operative run interrogations of these marginal techniques - if done to our troops we would call it torture, but if we are doing it "well, that's different." Might, just might, there be a connection? Especially when, in the trials of the involved enlisted personnel, discovery has been kept very tight, permitting only an occasional low-ranking officer to be interviewed, if that. Plus the punishments are in general fairly light considering what could have been charged, with one exception who was stupid enough to leave himself quite vulnerable. It's not that I hold US troopers in contempt, I hold the upper level leadership in contempt.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Ah well, when US troops allies get tortured to death, it will be for a "good" reason.
Revenge.
Makes me wonder how they train CIA interrogators... or maybe they just recruit from psychiatric units.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by shawnmmcc
In addition they are behaviors consistant with the Gonzales memos. Now, let's examine this using Occam'
s Razor (or KISS, keep it simple stupid). Memos from the White House Counsel hair-splitting over torture and abuse. Widespread, systematic use in the US military-run prisions/Intelligence Operative run interrogations of these marginal techniques - if done to our troops we would call it torture, but if we are doing it "well, that's different." Might, just might, there be a connection? Especially when, in the trials of the involved enlisted personnel, discovery has been kept very tight, permitting only an occasional low-ranking officer to be interviewed, if that. Plus the punishments are in general fairly light considering what could have been charged, with one exception who was stupid enough to leave himself quite vulnerable. It's not that I hold US troopers in contempt, I hold the upper level leadership in contempt. |
I have to agree with you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Then there was only one real socialist country in all of Europe, Yugoslavia during the Tito period. Not surprisingly, most Poli-Sci professors disagree with you and define the socialist form of government as what I wrote above. Take it up with them. |
Depends on how liberally you define worker control. I define more right-wing forms of socialism to have less worker control, which characterizes the Stalinist regimes, and left-wing forms to have more worker control.
If we go by your definition. Marx advocated communism, only as an end to something else which you haven't defined. Further, anarchism wouldn't be a form of socialism. Your definition simply doesn't make any sense, and no poli-sci professor would agree with it.
Last edited by Ramo on 22-02-2005 at 02:24
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|