 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Elok
Maybe the animal can feel pain, and I think it wrong to make an animal feel more pain than necessary, just on principle, but the beast is not human. It was bred and raised for the explicit purpose of being killed and eaten someday. So far as we can discern it, the purpose of these beasts' lives is to end, as Agent Smith put it in a really crappy movie. Yay for meat. |
Some people used to be bred and raised for the purpose of being exploited for labor. We call them slaves. We all find that institution repugnant, don't we?
In a future society (since you brought up the Matrix), if human beings were used for such a purpose, we'd all find it an atrocity. So what's different about animals? Sure, they aren't "human," but does that in and of itself make a justification, or prove they somehow don't have consciousness/emotions/self-awareness/whatever?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
General Ludd
|
 |
Minion of the Dominion
Aug 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
Read the thread that spiffor linked too Boris (actually, don't just skip to the last couple pages - it's all the ****ing same), Kuci's argument all comes down to there being no free will, and that humans (including himself, apparently) incorrectly think that they have a free will as a result of their inheritely mentally retarded nature. Consciousness is just a state of being stupid.
Last edited by General Ludd on 03-03-2005 at 18:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Geronimo
I wonder if any veggie burger tastes even remotely like beef.
If it can't resemble the taste of beef at least as much as a mcdonalds burger patty, I don't know that I could ever even try such a substitute.
(yes I'm quite aware that a mcdonalds beef patty is setting the standard incredibly low ) |
I believe the pointabout good vegetarian cuisine (and good vegan for that matter) is not that it replicates the taste or texture of meat (or fish or fowl) but that it is good in itself.
A notable feature of French cuisine, especially haute cuisine, is that a great deal of emphasis is placed on the quality of the meat or fish, or fowl, and accompanying reductions, veloute sauces, jus, et cetera, but that vegetables are very much overlooked, except if they are a first course, such as white asparagus.
Chinese Buddhist cuisine often uses gluten based substitutes for beef, or duck, or pork, the best of which resemble the meats they are meant to be to the extent that mock duck even has the 'goosepimples' associated with having been plucked. You can even have chicken's blood casserole which has been no nearer a chicken than McDonald's slurry McNuggets, and is much healthier.
I very rarely crave meat, but will eat it occasionally.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Did you even read my post? I wouldn't think that even they are self-aware, except for what I mentioned. I don't assume "only humans can be self-aware" - but my default assumption is that something is NOT self-aware, because there's virtually no way to establish that something is self-aware except through the logic that I used to explain why I believe humans are. |
Yes, I read your post, you seemed to have missed the point of mine--that your default assumption is groundless. By your logic, it would be just as reasonable to assume other humans aren't self-aware, that they're just automatons reacting to stimuli. Because the only "proof" we have of self-awareness is our own consciousness.
To segregate humans out as the only assumed self-aware beings is silly, since we have *no* way of knowing whether anything else is self-aware or not.
But, the fact that we do have self-awareness is, in and of itself, reason to believe that other species possess it, to carying degrees. As Ernst Mayr said, human consciousness is an evolutionary product that arose from animal consciousness. I find it puzzling you are an atheist who believes in evolution, yet seem to think there is some magical "on" switch for consciousness that only humans have and other species don't. That doesn't make much biological sense. What makes more sense is that there are varying degrees of self-awareness that species possess. Ours may be the most developed, but that doesn't mean there's some magical, mystical barrier between us and [other] animals.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Elok
|
 |
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Some people used to be bred and raised for the purpose of being exploited for labor. We call them slaves. We all find that institution repugnant, don't we?
In a future society (since you brought up the Matrix), if human beings were used for such a purpose, we'd all find it an atrocity. So what's different about animals? Sure, they aren't "human," but does that in and of itself make a justification, or prove they somehow don't have consciousness/emotions/self-awareness/whatever? |
Meh. If they do have a consciousness, it's probably rather different from mine. And such contradictions taught me long ago to value my species for its kinship to me, not for any projected ideas of theoretical cognition. A tree probably "feels" every stroke of the lumberjack's axe. Something happens to tell it, biochemically, that it is being damaged. It's a more agonizing way to die than anything used on human criminals in the civilized world. We still do it though, because it's just a tree.
Trying to project ideas of "how it feels" will inevitably give you the heebie-jeebies if you think about it long and hard enough, it's just easier for some animals which are more readily anthropomorphized. That kind of vegetarianism strikes me as off-balance and overly sentimental, comparable to deciding which endangered species to save based on which one is most easily trained to do cute tricks. I reject all platforms of rights based on ability.
Imagine all the millions of bacteria you kill when you microwave a burrito. If you heat a microbe, does it not shrivel? If you ***** it, does it not bleed cytoplasm? If you wrong it, does it not mutate to a resistant form and revenge? Suppose the burrito contains a rare and unique form of bacterium--you might be committing genocide!
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|