 |
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Pot is supposed to be harmless, why would people bother warning you that if you have a mental illness, that pot will make it worse?
|
Pot isn't 'supposed to be harmless'.
Like water, sugar, wheat, shellfish, honey, dairy products, eggs and alcohol, too much can kill you, or make some people seriously ill in small amounts.
Aspirin can kill you. Penicillin can kill you. Tobacco kills more people than heroin, year in, year out. Caffeine and cheese and red wine can provoke crippling migraines in some people.
What're you going to live on, air * ?
(filtered and purified through non-manmade devices, of course)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Why is pot prohibited when alcohol is not?
Well, put simply, the reason is that it's a "liberalising" issue. It's one of those little carrots that get dragged out to convince people that real progress is being made in the human race, while cleverly avoiding talking about all those side issues like how much tax money gets spent on weapons and how many torture implements get exported.
Put it another way - pot is a smokescreen. Establishments the world over would much rather the populations are docile and compliant - and hey, they can be prosecuted for being docile and compliant, that's even better, eh?
The reality is it doesn't matter a rats arse if pot is legal or not - people smoke it.
Personally I smoke it because I'm trying to stave off glaucoma and I know of no other medication that can help.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:21
|
|
yes it would be taxed, no doubt a lot, but if you put the production and distribution in the hands of big companies then the efficiency savings would be greater than the tax burden.
this would be true also for other drugs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:21
|
|
Verres:
For an 8th of skunk it probably costs about 20p to massproduce it. Going rate around here is £18-£25. If it was legalised like tobacco I'd have thunk it about £5-£10 including a completely insane amount of tax. On the other hand it's much easier to grow than tobacco.
"Ban it all" people:
Yes it's a drug, yes it can be harmful but then breathing ****ing oxygen will kill us all. Sex can cause heart attacks and alcohol can cause sex. No such thing as a free lunch, you take any kind of chemical or substance in your body and it will have negative effects. So no, it's not harmless, but then neither is anything else... you can't use the "omfg it might kill you" argument if you have a free society.
A couple of B&H every now and again isn't going to hurt, has a different effect to a 40/day habit. Couple glasses of wine a day is completely different to half a bottle of Bells for breakfast. Similarly, a bit of weed every now and again isn't the same as 4 joints a day from the age of 12.
And look at the reason it's illegal. I'm not sure about US and Canada but weed was banned in the UK in the 20's because the powerful wood paper industry lobbied government because hemp paper was a threat.
Last edited by Whaleboy on 05-03-2005 at 21:13
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|