 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:18
|
|
Right, 105kg does not necessarily mean fat. Doesn't even necessarily mean a huge beefcake with Rambo muscles. I have friends aroudn 90kg and 110kg, and none of them are fat or super muscular. They are in shape, and the one weighing 110kg, he is lean too. I don't know why he weighs so much though. He's 190cm tall, but still, quite lean. Some people do weigh that and not be fat or even THAT muscular.
Weight is certainly not an index to be measured if person is fat alone. Nor is the relation between weight and height, that's about the most stupid one. Only figure skaters go to normal category and ski jumpers. I mean, you can be totally normal built and be categorised fat, even if you are not carrying big muscles. How about just looking at the person and saying 'you are fat' or 'you are not fat', if that's what we need to find out?
And when it comes to police forces, I know people who are a bit overweight, but still are in better shape than some leaner people. They have better muscular shape, they have better cardio etc.
But Americans are fat, that's not a question.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Last Conformist
|
 |
of Calakmul
Jul 2003 time: 06:18
|
|
I must confess I find it somewhat hard to envision a person who is a few centimeters taller and 40 kg heavier than me, and is neither fat nor heavily muscular.
Last edited by Last Conformist on 05-03-2005 at 03:43
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|