 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Giancarlo
I hate people like you boris, who try to give dogs as a whole a bad image, when it is not the case. |
Except that's not what I'm doing, since I explicitley stated that 1) I like dogs, and 2) you can't generalize about dogs (or cats or any other animal) that they are "bad." You're just too clueless to actually read and comprehend the argument.
quote:
There are some feral and stray dogs out there that do bite people.. and also bad owners who abuse their animals and make them into attack dogs.... that does not speak for dogs as a whole. |
I never said they spoke for dogs as a whole--quite the opposite, I stated they do not. But when it comes to a claim that cats are "just as dangerous" as dogs, such a claim is easily refuted by abundant evidence to the contrary (not to mention simple common sense).
My point is not to demonize dogs (which I like), but to defend cats from demonization.

Did you even read that? No, of course you didn't...then you would have realized it had NOTHING to do with the way you used that "word." "Generalization" was the word you wanted, without any unneccessary modifiers (and it would still have been a completely inaccurate portrayal of what I said).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Giancarlo
I bet more people die from getting struck by lighting each year. |
And this is relevant...how? Once again, you have a failure of comprehension. This isn't about dogs being deadlier than car accidents, lightning strikes, heart attacks, snowmobiles, yellow fever, etc. It's about dogs being deadlier than cats.
Since you have failed to provide any evidence supporting your ludicrous assertion that cats are "just as dangerous" as dogs, I can only conclude you once again are cluelessly BAMing.
quote: You are an idiot, boris. I'm sorry I'm just and ****ing tired of your B.S. If you want to talk about cats all the time, fine. But I want a pet that is more active and energetic.. and that actually has some ****ing intelligence. |
Ad hominems are unbecoming, dear Pedro.
People like dogs and cats for different reasons, it's true. But it must KILL you that cats are now more popular as pets in the U.S. than dogs. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Giancarlo
Hey Boris, you want to post a link to that? |
http://www.sequoiahumane.com/articl...popular-pet.htm
"The American Pet Products Manufacturers Association, the leading U.S. not-for-profit pet industry organization, conducts comprehensive research examining demographics, buying habits and other traits of U.S. guardians of dogs, cats, fish, birds, reptiles, and small animals."
I find it funny you demanded a link, since you've not even provided any statistics as of yet for your wild claims, not to mention links. But I am happy to oblige.
quote:
And as far as I'm concerned, dogs are much larger animals. |
I wouldn't argue that, and so what?
quote:
Again I'm trying to move the thread away from your ****ing insanity, and onto common sense. |
I see. You mean your "common sense" assertion that cats are "just as dangerous" as dogs, when you admit that dogs are much larger and there are tons of cited examples of dog attacks, and yet no comparable statistics for cats? Yes, such common sense!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Adagio

|
|
IIRC Giancarlo's old nick was Fez
Last edited by Adagio on 12-03-2005 at 04:08
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|