 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by aneeshm
My dear Ted , I am not cold-blooded by any standard . Indeed , it is my belief that the business that passes the benifits on to its customers is one who will survive , because it offers better things for a lower price - rule of the market . I have seen it happening in my country . I have seen how the telecom giants of India bought the mobile phone within reach of some of poorest .
And another thing - won't human jobs just be shifted up the value chain , as has been happening till now ? |
Like I said, it's SUPPOSED to shifted up, but often times it is not.
Like I said, here in the US, CEOs make 300 times more than their average line worker. This 300 number has been increasing rapidly over the past 20 years, while technology has been replacing alot of jobs.
Technology is also SUPPOSED to free our lives up to focus on other things, but it never does, it just lets us squeeze in more stuff and get stressed out more quickly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Whoha
|
 |
The TOC is supposed to be classified guys...
Dec 2001 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by aneeshm
There is an issue that I have thought may be important in future .
Methods and AI are evolving to a point where we may have humaniform robots capable of doing most manual labour and repetitive jobs within the next 20 to 30 years . The processing power required will have arrived by then , and the prototypes for neural networks capable of learning and evolving are already here .
If more is spent on this technology , robots will become capable of replacing unskilled and semi-skilled manual labour ( one where no deep analytical thinking is involved , and where the variations ae few ) . We will also have robots capable of adapting and learning from past problems , as neural nets are already doing . Thus , a robots imprinted with oly the basic ability to learn , and apply that learning willl be in priduction not too far off . THey will also be vastly cheaper than an average worker .
Is it ethical , then , for employers to completely replace low and semi-skilled human labour ( cashiers , receptionists , manual labourers , waiters , secretaries , etc. ) with robot labour as soon as it becomes available ? This will be accomplished within five to ten years , will lead to a collapse of social security , even if full severance benifits are given to said workers .
I say it is perfectly fine to replace humans when possible/necessary/benificial . What do you say ? |
Well we already have done some of this, It is not a source for lost jobs, what it means is that more people will be involved in the design and manufacture of the capital improvements/machine tools/etc. Moving people out of menial labor and into manufacturing and tech is beneficial for everyone.
However, the society you are showing will never come to pass because we can not build AI the way you envision it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|