 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ajbera
|
 |
of the Cookieville Minimum Security Orphanarium
Apr 1999 time: 05:30
|
|
Question: at what point is it pedophilia? If you're looking at pics of 10 year old girls, that's icky. At, say, 16 years old, they're still minors, still technically children, yet there are some smoking hot 16 year old girls out there, and prurient interest in them is markedly diferent than interest in a prepubescent girl.
So, legally, I suppose pictures of anybody under 18 can be considered child porn, but there is a real difference in the appearance of a true child (10 yo) versus a young woman (16 or 17 yo). The first indicates interest in children, the second in (young) women.
And I know the issue at hand involves boys, but my point still stands. Although both are legally pedophilia, one is very different from the other.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I'm not equating being gay to being a pedophile, I'm pointing out their hypocrisy in taking a "moral highground" in banning gays while allowing a pedophile to be a high-ranked leader. |
How is it hypocritical if you place said leader on leave pending resolution of the charges and presumably would fire him if he is guilty?
I think a ban on gay leaders is crap but no organization can ever "totally" protect themselves. You can do background checks, interviews whatever but I don't think folks will just pipe up and say " by the way, I get my jollies from looking at children"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ajbera
Question: at what point is it pedophilia? If you're looking at pics of 10 year old girls, that's icky. At, say, 16 years old, they're still minors, still technically children, yet there are some smoking hot 16 year old girls out there, and prurient interest in them is markedly diferent than interest in a prepubescent girl.
So, legally, I suppose pictures of anybody under 18 can be considered child porn, but there is a real difference in the appearance of a true child (10 yo) versus a young woman (16 or 17 yo). The first indicates interest in children, the second in (young) women.
And I know the issue at hand involves boys, but my point still stands. Although both are legally pedophilia, one is very different from the other. |
It's interesting because if you have sex with a minor, it's only considered paedophilia if the child is under 14 years old (this can vary state to state country to country). Vs having sex with someone over 14 and under 18 is just statuatory rape.
but... If you have any kind of naked pictures of people under 18, all of it is considered child porn.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:30
|
|
diss, you really dont wish you had gay sex in the scouts. teenagers dont know what theyre doing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:30
|
|
haha, scouting was is and always has been gay
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|