 |
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Personally, I'd cut benefits and raise the retirement age. |
Raising retirement age, yes... but I'd cut the subsidies to the farmers and other subsides on food prices.
I mean, a quarter of Americans are super chunky - why not give the same money but let food prices raise to more natural levels?
EDIT: One big difference between bonds and stocks - bonds are fixed term. You know you`ll get your money back (otherwise Federal govt would lose all financial backing overnight).
Stocks need careful watching day to day and even minute to minute to get the best price back. There CAN be a higher return than bonds - but it's not guaranteed. Something like 80% of stock trades lose small amounts of money.
In other words - who pays for the people to watch the stock markets and trade at the right times, eh?
Last edited by Cruddy on 01-04-2005 at 23:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JimmyCracksCorn
|
|
Macedonia - Sovereign country north of Greece.
Dec 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
I could accept this. However, I have heard differently in that blacks as a whole do not live long enough to take advantage of SS. |
Ned, African American mortality statistics are skewed because of such high rates of death among young (usually urban) blacks who die from un-natural causes. But if you exclude those deaths, blacks actually live longer than whites on average.
Don't ask me to cite that, but I'm 90% positive its true.
Edit: Didn't realize there was a last page. This has already been said.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Well gee, I don't know.
Maybe because I've been paying into it for 20 years already?
I deserve to have it when I retire?
I'd rather know I'm going to have it, than hope I'm going to have. |
(1) You will be compensated according to your contributions no matter the system we have.
(2) If you would prefer to invest 100% of your non-SS retirement fund in a riskless asset, such as government bonds, you would be able to do so. I think you're clinically insane for doing so, but different people have different risk preferences, and who am I to judge.
(3) If you wish to stay in SS entirely, you can do so. I would prefer that increasingly few people choose SS, but nobody's going to force you out of the system if your heart is set on it.
Last edited by DanS on 02-04-2005 at 02:20
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: The battle-cry of the Bush supporter!! |
I'm not a Bush supporter in this case, really. I'm a supporter of Social Security reform and sadly Bush is the only one who has made a major push for it in decades. Who knows when we'll see another attempt if this fails? |
I thought Clinton scrapped most of the Social Security system to pay off the national deficit? Sounds like a reform to me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|