 |
|  |
 |
|
Heresson
|
 |
of frogs
Jun 2000 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Wernazuma III
Personally, I can't find good arguments against the use of condoms in the bible. 
And as you should know yourself, there's this funny little thing called tradition in the Catholic church, and hating the body is pretty much a product of neoplatonic influenced theologians, like St. Augustine. |
Jesus and Fathers of the Church did not say everything. We should expand their teachings.
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
I personally think that the Catholic Church should recognize gay couples as loving couples. From a spiritual point of view, Jesus greatest teaching is that love is above all. If you drop the idea that homosexuality is sin, and adopt the idea that sexual orientation is one element of human diversity, then the Christian thing to do is to make it easier for the people to love and commit to each other |
Sexual orientation is just a name, and a misleading one.
Even if homosexuality is not a disease but it's determined before our birth, and it's not proven beyond any doubt - at least some of homosexuals become them due to circumstances- it has no biological purpouse and it is not "natural". "Orientation" name suggests that it's just a matter of opinion or individual preferences, of which all are the same. It is not. Homosexuality is a "deviation" (by which i do not mean anything wrong, just I don't know a better word), but not very harmful to society, so it should not be banned, and homosexuals should not be persecuted in any way.
However, You can't put a "=" sign between homosexual and heterosexual relationship.
quote: Originally posted by alva
Not to mention that jezus way gay too.
All he did was steal married men from their wives, give them different names (Petrus, hard like a rock!!! ) and then start up a male only club...you do the math. |
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Lies! Jesus was bi, as my sig attests. |
You're both pathetic
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Heresson
|
 |
of frogs
Jun 2000 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
|
What?
quote: Originally posted by alva
quote: You're both pathetic |
That thruth really isn't working out for you, is it.
|
"Don't believe the devil, even if He says truth"
I could say, but simpler answer is that You don't know what the truth is.
quote: and it's not proven beyond any doubt |
Ah, but god is?? or even jezus for that matter. [/QUOTE]
Jesus is more proven then many other historical figures.
And God is not a scientific theory that You can prove or disprove. He IS for the believers.
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Yes, but on the "love" side of things, a homosexual couple can feel just as much love and commitment as a heterosexual one. Even thoughhomosexual couples can be less beneficial to society than heterosexual ones (in that they can't reproduce), why should such a relatively trifle matter like that prevent the Catholic Church from celebrating what it is about : love? |
But catholic marriage is not, or rather was not originally, about love. It was about procreation, which was the only excuse for it.
If a pair of males can't reproduce, it's a sign from God it is not good. "You will recognise the tree by its fruit" said Jesus. He also said that a tree giving no fruit will be destroyed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
If a pair of males can't reproduce, it's a sign from God it is not good. "You will recognise the tree by its fruit" said Jesus. He also said that a tree giving no fruit will be destroyed. |
Thre parable about the trees bearing fruit had absolutely nothing to do with sexuality, it was Christ's explanation of why he was starting a "new covenant" to replace the old. In this parable the Hebrew faith of that era was comparable to the fruitless tree, but his new faith, and by extension it's disciples, would "bear fruit".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alexander's Horse
|
 |
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970 time: 15:35
|
|
leave the homos alone - the catholic clergy would collapse without them
and if the way he conducted the funeral mass is any guide Benedict XVI is probably a fruit himself
Last edited by Alexander's Horse on 22-04-2005 at 04:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
No, I am not sure about female homosexuality, but research shows that male homosexuality is a combination of genetics and hormonal conditions in the womb. You can't "become gay" from some kind of external influence after birth. |
Bah.
Homosexuality -just like heterosexuality- is rarely an either/or. I've heard of research that suggests that most people can be aroused by both sexes, although there are clear preferences. There were as few hardcore homos as there were hardcore straights (people not attracted at all by one sex).
But our way of life (monogamous, favourable to heterosexuality, which depicts sexual orientation as an either/or) makes it so that people have to make one choice. The natural inclination toward a sex might be entirely biologic, but the way people act upon it is nurtured. As such, you can become gay, in that you can choose not to act at all on your inclination toward women. Heck, over here, we have at least two people who became gay.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|