 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
St Leo
|
 |
Member of the Apolyton Social Democratic Party
Jul 2005 time: 00:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Yes, the larger picture of two distinct sexes. What are you not getting here? |
I am saying that, just like Good and Evil, Man and Woman are a lossy way of looking at the world.
Yes, everything can be categorized as Good and Evil. Everyone can be categorized as Man and Woman. And every bitmap picture can be converted to greyscale and resized to 1x1.
But, by doing so, we lose crucial details. The model fails to approximate the real world within a reasonable margin of error Man and Woman is not very useful as a descriptive model, and it should never be used as a predictive model.
And better approximations exist.
Look at the picture space05 posted. I don't look anything like the five Men pictured, despite having the same set of genitalia and the same taste in the genitalia of a partner. If I may continue judging books by their covers, our interests, talents, and skills are very different. Something that engages my imagination and my intellect would leave them bored shitless, and vice versa.
Anyways...
* St Leo throws Lego blocks at JohnT
You doodoohead! Waawaaawaawaaawaaa.
Preemption is fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:35
|
|
quote: But, by doing so, we lose crucial details. The model fails to approximate the real world within a reasonable margin of error Man and Woman is not very useful as a descriptive model, and it should never be used as a predictive model.
And better approximations exist.
Look at the picture space05 posted. I don't look anything like the five Men pictured, despite having the same set of genitalia and the same taste in the genitalia of a partner. If I may continue judging books by their covers, our interests, talents, and skills are very different. Something that engages my imagination and my intellect would leave them bored shitless, and vice versa. |
Quite a wordy way to make the point that individuals are different.
However, groups of them based upon similar characteristics will exhibit... similar characteristics. What's so rough about that concept?
Sure you lose some "real world" subtle differences - but here's the thing. The "real world" is comprised of 10/\66 atom, Earth has 10/\49 atoms, but my brain has only 10/\11 neurons, meaning that any "real world" percieved by you and I is nothing but a model forced upon us by lack of information processing power.
So, chill. The subdivision of people into "men" and "women", even if a mental construct, is still a useful tool for making ones way around this world (which still has but two genders (as far as humans are concerned.))
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:35
|
|
Maybe St. Leo is right - we should have more genders. I move for man, woman and sissy.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|