 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
I've beens swamped all week and haven't had a chance to get on here, but since I work in HR, I thought I'd chime in.
If I have a pool of 5-6 candidates for a job that are all qualified for it, then I will hire the person who is the best overall fit for the company, not necessarily the one of that group who has the "best" qualifications. If you're at the interview stage, then you've met a base level of qualifications needed for the job, and you can be assured everyone else interviewing has as well. Companies are often willing to take on less-qualified people whom they think are overall better for the company.
Beyond qualifications for the job, I have to assess several things:
-Will they be a personality fit with their supervisor
-Will they get along well with their colleagues and fit in easily
-Will they be a long-termer, or will the jump ship the moment a better/higher paying job comes along
The last is critical. I want people who will stick with the company for a while, who have potential to grow in their roles and become a real asset. If s/he's looks like she's going to jump to a new job in 6 months-1 year, then it's a waste of my time. The easiest way to assess this is look at their resume and see if they are a job hopper. Job hoppers have tons of experience, but it's usually all a matter of a few months here and there at any one company. That never looks good.
I'd echo rah in that you should never adjust your style of interviewing based on one rejection. The most important thing to be in an interview is yourself. If a company decides you're not the right personality fit, they're probably right, in which case they're doing you a favor. Who'd want to work in a company culture that isn't right for them? That just leads to trouble.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
child of Thor
|
|
A friend of mine from school days got turned down by Cambridge University twice.
He was one of those child genius types - all science and maths(which was his main subject). He used to teach some of the lessons in the schools top maths group because he just knew it better than the teacher.
It was a shame, because he'd set himself up for cambridge for a long time, even wanting to become a proffessor there.
Still i remember after his first failed interview, he was really gutted, became distant from most of his school friends and just recently i heard he had tried again a couple of years after his first attempt, but didnt pass the interview, even though his skills were way over the requirements.
Ok he could speak in 1+0's , but i never found him incapable of normal communication? I keep meaning to try to catch up with him and see where hes at.
Sometimes i guess we never really know exactly the reasons that we don't get what we are expecting to get?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JimmyCracksCorn
|
|
Macedonia - Sovereign country north of Greece.
Dec 2002 time: 05:18
|
|
"We'd love to employ you, but... we decided to not get back to you or return any of your phone calls/e-mails"
Thats the one that pisses me off.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher

I have been in the job market for 6 years now, and I have been with 2 companies. The first company told me that after 2 years I would be elgible for promotion. After 20 months of working for them they raised the 2 year standard to 5 years. That ticked me off. So I applied for the promotion anyway, and was denied it for lack of tenure, stated by "you didn't want it enough". So, I left. |
So you applied for a promotion that you weren't even eligible for by the original rules, got turned down, and then quit out of irritation?
quote: I have been with this company 4 years. When I started I was given a specific compensation with a specific timeline for promotions and pay raises. 2 years ago the company got bought out, and all those promises thrown to the wind. I had to fight for my promotion, and I am now looking because the job growth in this company, in this area, looks really bad. Staying for the last 2 years has been tough, but I did so because I didn't want to be labled a job hopper. Needless to say I am being very picky on the next job I take and want to stay there for at least 5 years. |
Sounds like a more reasonable plan of action than in the first scenario. 
Yeah, buyouts suck 'cause the rules can change on you. I feel for ya.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Fair enough. Companies looking for people who want a career, ought to be providing them with one, and not just the job.
Too often the 'careers' provided have the following characteristics:
1. Too few hours to make a living wage
2. Too low compensation to do the same
Or some combination of the two.
You want a career, then you should be looking at giving me something I can live off of, not a job where I need to find two others just to make ends meet.
Capische? |
In this job market, why should an employer go for that when he can find someone just as qualified who will swallow his pride and give the employer what he wants?
You may think the hours/wages are demeaning, but in most cases, an employer won't offer them unless they can get people for those terms.
I'll never forget the e-mail we got from someone about a job we had posted on our company website. It was for a night-time, part-time document processor, $9/hour. The e-mail basically said, "hey, maybe you'd get people for this job if you offered more than a demeaning wage." Funny enough, that e-mail was sandwiched in between dozens of resume submittals for the same job. We filled it pretty quickly.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|