 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
There haven't been any well designed histological studies of gay and straight cadaver brains, so the data from the studies done in the past is suspect. They compared the size of certain cell clusters in the brains of cadavers of straight men and gay men. There were several probelems in the study, among which were the very small number of subjects studied (less than ten), and the disparities between the two groups. The straight group tended to be much older introducing the possibility that some of them might have suffered from degenerative brain diseases. A large portion of the gay group died of AIDS, which we know now infects the brain in addition to the immune systema and other organ systems. The thing is AFAIK the study was never repeated, which is often a sign that the result was not repeatable because it was based on errors of technique or design.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
Until I know for certain how sexual orientation develops, I'm not going to rely exclusively on the argument, "it's not a choice" because there are other, and perhaps, even more effective, ways to advocate for equal rights. |
Because gays have done such a bang up job of getting their civil rights recongized until now. 
While a majority of Americans do not approve of homosexuality, you will not get them to agree to civil rights for gays if they think homosexuality is a choice. When people think gays have no choice but to be gay, they then agree it's wrong to discriminate, even if they don't approve of homosexuality.
This is a seperate question from whether or not we should find out the truth. I don't care one way or the other. I see homosexuality as something which is, and something which is beautiful, and that sex between consenting adults isn't a shameful thing. To me, it wouldn't matter whether people chose to be gay or not. I'm not in the majority.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Because gays have done such a bang up job of getting their civil rights recongized until now. 
While a majority of Americans do not approve of homosexuality, you will not get them to agree to civil rights for gays if they think homosexuality is a choice. When people think gays have no choice but to be gay, they then agree it's wrong to discriminate, even if they don't approve of homosexuality.
This is a seperate question from whether or not we should find out the truth. I don't care one way or the other. I see homosexuality as something which is, and something which is beautiful, and that sex between consenting adults isn't a shameful thing. To me, it wouldn't matter whether people chose to be gay or not. I'm not in the majority. |
Now I'm not sure who is sexier with the rolling eyes smilie -- you or JohnT.
Anyway, relying on only one means to advocate for equal rights just doesn't make sense to me, when we use other effective arguments as well. Yes, I understand what you're saying about the strength of the argument that if it's not a choice, then discrimination cannot be justified.
But to me, that is still not a completely solid ground to stand on, since our rights can continued to be denied until we can prove how sexual orientation develops, which will show that is not a choice. So in the meantime, I'm for effective arguments that can bring change sooner than when we have proven how sexual orientation develops.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|