 |
|  |
 |
|
GAZ082
|
 |
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Jul 2004 time: 02:19
|
|
I remember, like... 3 years ago, when i discovered God knows how, that a new version of CIV was in the works, i was really exited. Nice graphics, culture but after being chatting and posting in these very forums for moths, the result was that CIV III was not so good as CIV II and i was very dissapointed.
An AI that just wanted to conquer at all costs was my first concern, as im the type of guy who likes to play a pacific game and only fight wars to bring balance to the force (as i used to do in CIV II), nothing more, i dont play for the score.
I dont remember what other cool things i was having in my head at that momet that made me though "yay! this game will rock!" but what i do remember is that after a month playing CIV, i just turned and looked somewhere for more games (that made me know Paradox and their EU2 and Crusader Kings and Victoria), wasnt thrilled anymore by the so called "CIV franchise" (dont know why is so trendy to speak about a "franchise" rather than "game", years ago that word was never used, perhaps CIV is just becoming another massive product, not a game for its hardcore fans?)
I remember Sid saying "aye, CIV III will have things for the n00bs and for the 31373" (not textual, but kinda ) As CIV fan since 93, when the guy who sold me the game said "i dont really understand this game" and i barely could understand english, nevertheless got hooked, i said "this games aint for experienced players! is for today's warmongers that have no patience!"
I never bought the expantion, in fact, i never realized that was an expantion called Conquests just because i had not visitted CIV sites for years until now. Im gonna get Conquest cos is cheap and give it a try, people say that enhances the game a lot. Lets see.
But about cIV, experience say to me not being so exited. There are super neat features like 3d word, able to build things over resources, experienced units (a 41 level veteran spearman will be more valuable than a n00b mosqueter), religion, the promised improved AI (well, play to believe) the Python thingie (happens that i know something about Python) more units, more civs, more techs, Wondermovies! and lots of stuff. Is hard not being thrilled with these features, but, again, experience says me to be precautions.
What does experience or your heart tell to you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SCUrfer
|
|
Ha, you thought Civ II was a disappointment? I got caught up in the hype for Call to Power. That was sad.
I'm cautiously optimistic about Civ IV. It could suck, but it could be great. The change of publisher actually makes me hopeful.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Trifna
|
 |
of anchovies
Jul 2001 time: 13:19
|
|
(also an answer to Shogun Gunner)
I believe that Firaxis is playing well in the corporate game, understanding (and getting many to understand) that the point is not to create something for the sake of the creation, but so that it gets somewhere. There is a market for a broad-market Civ, and a bunch of other markets for smaller markets. Well, I wish the best runner (Firaxis) to get the greatest role, bringing the greatest result per manhour effort (or per pot of coffey). And so Civ can gets better, pushed by the best, on all levels. When I say all levels, I include smaller (and more serious-driven) markets: look at Age of Men.
It also dodges the problem of having always more details, instead of more comprehensive (such as some hardcore fans ask, as for MOO3). The fewest manhour lost in errors (with trial-errors), the best.
This way, Civ-type games ends up in the greatest number of hands, for the many to marvel at and the students of history to use in parallel to... Paradox and others.
Last edited by Trifna on 10-05-2005 at 16:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lemmy
Overall, compared to civ3 i'm positive about it. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Protra3211
|
|
I think that they have seen the work that has gone into the many mods to improve both Civ 2 and 3.
A civlizaton game without many details to keep up with would become too easy. Might as well play RON
I dont think that they will try to dumb it down too much but maybe they will improve tutorials for beginners.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|