 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
SnowFire
|
 |
New York City, NY
Jan 1970 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by cyclotron7
The trouble is (and correct me if I'm mistaken, I've only taken Japanese for a few years) that the Japanese language was developed more or less in isolation. Chinese characters were adopted to give it a written form later, but the fact that the language existed as a different spoken tongue for a long time before this means that there isn't really much similarity even with Chinese, despite the use of Chinese characters for kanji. |
Yes, which is evil for Chinese speakers. However the mere fact that kanji are used is far more evil for English speakers. Ideograms suck compared to alphabets. As an example, I don't really know Italian (aside from some music terms, cognates from English & Latin, Dante references, and so on). But with cognates, I think it'd take about 3 weeks of work to be a proper tourist & visit. Given 3 weeks of prep, I could read street signs, read the newspaper, have an idea of what the correct pronunciaiton of things are, and so on. I might not understand it all, but I could get parts & maybe gather the general idea.
Change 3 weeks into 3 years for Japanese. Maybe you might get some quick spoken proficiency, but there are... what... 2000 or so daily-use kanji you'd need to learn simply to be able to attempt to read signs? Never mind learning how to actually pronounce them.
I'm thinking the best way to learn Japanese is to either be really serious about it, or go live in Japan a la Drake. I know it'd just take massive exposure for me at least to wrap my head around all those kanji to get some kind of reading proficiency down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|