 |
|
Colon
|
 |
Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
Dan most certainly isn't amongst the most rightist members on this board. I've spend some time with him and I've hardle heard him utter one single conservative word on social issues. Pretty much an urban 20-something like any other.
And sure, he's a bit messed up in his economics, but who isn't nowadays.
Last edited by Colon on 21-05-2005 at 14:32
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Hey! Don'ty forget CivNation!
I think that Fez/Giancarlo and Albert Speers would have to rank as the most right-winged of all. It takes a dedicated right-winger to stick up for Franco.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:21
|
|
Gays are devil offspring...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Berz has lived a sheltered life. He's never been exposed to old people, he's not aware of how people get weaker as they age, or get arthritis or other ilnesses.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
define "right", if economic freedom - market liberalism - is right wing then why aren't the people who believe in personal or social freedom right wing as well?
The problem is liberals are more accepting of personal freedom but not economic freedom and social conservatives - the "religious right" - believe the opposite. To call one group "left" and the other "right" seems to miss the point. If liberals are making my economic decisions and conservatives are making my personal decisions, they're just 2 sides of the same coin and those who believe in freedom lose regardless of which side rears it's ugly head. Calling one left and the other right is about as useful as making a distinction between socialists and fascists. |
Berz, congrats. Someone who has begun to think. Left and right has at least three and maybe more axes: Economic, social and political. Economically, the LESS government control, the more RIGHT one is. Socially, the MORE control over social decisions, the more RIGHT one is. Politically, I would say, the more democratic the more RIGHT one is, but here we can have an healthy debate, as I see leftists always on the side of totalitarianism regardless of their demurrers to the contrary.
I personally am economically and politically on the right. Socially, I tend to be on the left, but only to a small degree.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
Ned is so rightwing he has a whole universe to himself, where history takes bizarre turns, and Great Britain started WWI in order to start losing its empire and cede its financial position in South America to the U.S. and somehow also bizarrely began WWII, despite Germany's invasion of Poland having a prior claim.
|
I think you meant WWII.
When I was a kid, I was taught that there was no real blame attached to any power regarding WWI. It just snowballed, historians said, due to interlocking alliances.
But as to WWII and as to a lot of the other conflicts in the world since WWI*, Britian is deeply involved in creating the causes for war and to actually starting them. Now I am not the only one who has ever said this, as it appears to be a consensus view among all of Britains victims. But, British propaganda is very good, I agree. It almost has most of the world convinced that Britain is the most disinterested, kindly and munificent nation that ever existed.
*Germany vs. Poland, China vs. Japan, Arab vs. Jew in Palestine, Pakistan vs. India. There are more of course. But these stand out.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|