 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:35
|
|
"Early this year, I saw an extremely odd and distinct UFO for several minutes, and my neighbors saw it for a portion of that time after I went to get them.
The flight behavior, color, and physical characteristics of the thing was just bizarre, and I have yet to come up with anything (and I'm an aerospace/rocketry geek) that would explain what we saw.
Not quite the same as stories about little grey things playing with my DNA and drilling random holes in my teeth, though."
HAHAHA!
I'm soo glad.
I saw some lights once too. Rather boring after a while, and there was an air war going on ...Jets vs Miami, so after a while I went with the ball game over the aliens. Still, it happened. I saw it. Impossible, but they do exist.
Ha!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
child of Thor
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Early this year, I saw an extremely odd and distinct UFO for several minutes, and my neighbors saw it for a portion of that time after I went to get them.
The flight behavior, color, and physical characteristics of the thing was just bizarre, and I have yet to come up with anything (and I'm an aerospace/rocketry geek) that would explain what we saw.
Not quite the same as stories about little grey things playing with my DNA and drilling random holes in my teeth, though. |
I've got a good friend who has a simular experience from about 12 years ago in the uk. As you say the way the thing moved in the sky, its colour and shape were all not 'normal' - he really doesn't know what it was either.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
Non-random vector and velocity changes over an extended period of time and significant arc of the sky (approximately 40° observed straightline flight, then a 10° by 15° box)
Aerobatic maneuvers far beyond the capability of any manned flight and far beyond the flight performance envelope of any UAV.
No aspect or luminance changes on a resolvable disk light source of about 45 arc-seconds diameter, until a straight vector change with linear dimming for two minutes and twenty seconds.
Color of light source did not correspond to any signal or navigation light, or any color of light from combustion of any aviation or rocketry fuel source - not even similar.
Based on the times to make different arc transits in the sky, I did some quick calculations of distance v. velocity, and then estimated a minimum distance based on lack of sound, and total inability with very high end binoculars to resolve anything beyond a single light source, even when the object passed in front of other light sources, I came up with some size v. distance estimates.
The range of possibilities totally eliminated any UAVs, the uniformity and invariance of the light source plus non-random vector changes eliminate any natural phenomena I've ever heard of, and the rate of vector change and distance/speed and size/distance estimates eliminated any manned aircraft.
So I'm open to any further suggestions. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:35
|
|
No, MrFun is right. It might have been Ronald McDonald doing some test flying in his new 'McSaucer'.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Adam Smith
|
 |
Maryland, USA
Jan 1970 time: 00:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Non-random vector and velocity changes over an extended period of time and significant arc of the sky (approximately 40° observed straightline flight, then a 10° by 15° box)
Aerobatic maneuvers far beyond the capability of any manned flight and far beyond the flight performance envelope of any UAV.
No aspect or luminance changes on a resolvable disk light source of about 45 arc-seconds diameter, until a straight vector change with linear dimming for two minutes and twenty seconds.
Color of light source did not correspond to any signal or navigation light, or any color of light from combustion of any aviation or rocketry fuel source - not even similar.
Based on the times to make different arc transits in the sky, I did some quick calculations of distance v. velocity, and then estimated a minimum distance based on lack of sound, and total inability with very high end binoculars to resolve anything beyond a single light source, even when the object passed in front of other light sources, I came up with some size v. distance estimates.
The range of possibilities totally eliminated any UAVs, the uniformity and invariance of the light source plus non-random vector changes eliminate any natural phenomena I've ever heard of, and the rate of vector change and distance/speed and size/distance estimates eliminated any manned aircraft.
So I'm open to any further suggestions. | 1. It's a firefly.
2. Go a little lighter on the tequila amigo. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|