 |
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sn00py
I
Throughout the ages what has caused population growth exactly? Did the advanced Civilizations (such as the romans) have many children? Or just the underdeveloped civilizations?
|
A primary cause would be new types of food, or new farming methods.
But perhaps more importantly are death rates. China has a large population because it was relatively stable and peaceful for 2,000-odd years.
A society engaged in long-term warfare has less ability to feed itself and more people dying which affects the logirithmic (correct word?) population increase.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:34
|
|
quote:
1) women's rights, work oppertunities for women
|
Actually, that tends to result in a population decline, and has one of the strongest correlations with population decline.
quote:
2) available money/capital/resources
|
Not really. The wealthier you are, the less you have to rely upon children to take care of you, and the fewer you need to have to ensure that they will support you.
The poorer you are, often results in just the opposite, that you put everything you have into your kids, who then take care of you when you get older.
Also, if you know that having 3 kids, means 3 kids live to adulthood, then you are less likely to have more than 3 kids. If their future is less certain, then it won't make sense to only have 3.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
St Leo
|
 |
Member of the Apolyton Social Democratic Party
Jul 2005 time: 00:34
|
|
The health of the average individual, and the way it impacts their lifespan.
Nutritious food, reasonable work conditions, sanitation, comfortable housing and the rest are merely factors that influence health.
Of course, we aren't about to intentionally cut the average the lifespan, so we have to solve the population growth crisis by appealing to human intelligence rather than human nature. The best way of doing is that is by educating and intellectually stimulating as many people of all classes, genders, sexes, creeds, religions, and sexes as possible.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lawrence of Arabia
|
 |
of the Gulag Archipelago
Apr 2001 time: 06:34
|
|
quote:
Actually, that tends to result in a population decline, and has one of the strongest correlations with population decline. |
yeah i know, thats why i listed it. lack of womens rights means more children.
quote:
Not really. The wealthier you are, the less you have to rely upon children to take care of you, and the fewer you need to have to ensure that they will support you.
The poorer you are, often results in just the opposite, that you put everything you have into your kids, who then take care of you when you get older.
Also, if you know that having 3 kids, means 3 kids live to adulthood, then you are less likely to have more than 3 kids. If their future is less certain, then it won't make sense to only have 3. |
poor people spend less capital per kid, but have more kids. rich people have less kids, but spend more on each of them. (poor as in 3rd world, rich as in 1st world.) less resources also means more of the kids die young, so you need to have more in order to have a family. (which is what you said) its just a trade off. poor people have less oppertunity cost to having kids, so they have more (which takes up more of their time)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|