 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Here.
Question 1: Why should Microsoft leave China?
Question 2: What benefit does China receive by Microsoft leaving?
Question 3: What benefit do the people of China receive by Microsoft leaving?
Question 4: What benefit does Microsoft receive by leaving?
Question 5: Why should Shareholders support such a decision to leave the fastest growing and future largest market over this?
If you can provide any kind of reasonable argument for questions 1-5, you'll redeem yourself.
Until then, knock it off with all this talks about refuting his ethical argument. This is an argument asking a public company to lose tons of money over a political statement, so he'll need to do a helluva job to make a convincing argument to me and other shareholders. |
Oh, its so cute you think I need to get your approval. Unimaginable as it is, I could not care less what your opinion of me is..shocking, I know.
As for knocking this out-why the hell do you enter into a debate with Aggie in the first place?
Aggie said he thought MS should not do business in China if censoring weblongs was part of it. Fine, you disagree. But it was your choice to engage in the thread, and what Aggies was making form day one was an ehtical argument about corporate responsiblity. If you are not willing to argue that, then why did you try?
You are not even arguing on the same plane as him, so essentially you two are talking past each other, which is usually the case. What I find funny is that Aggie seems more aware of that problem than you, but he is more of a jerk sometimes, so he seems to care less, just to argue with you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Oh, its so cute you think I need to get your approval. Unimaginable as it is, I could not care less what your opinion of me is..shocking, I know.
As for knocking this out-why the hell do you enter into a debate with Aggie in the first place?
Aggie said he thought MS should not do business in China if censoring weblongs was part of it. Fine, you disagree. But it was your choice to engage in the thread, and what Aggies was making form day one was an ehtical argument about corporate responsiblity. If you are not willing to argue that, then why did you try?
You are not even arguing on the same plane as him, so essentially you two are talking past each other, which is usually the case. What I find funny is that Aggie seems more aware of that problem than you, but he is more of a jerk sometimes, so he seems to care less, just to argue with you. |
I'm sorry, could you please respond to my questions in the form they are asked? For example, "1. " should precede your answer for question 1.
Because right now, I can't see the answers to my questions in your post.
I take it failure to answer the questions means I've made my point, and you concede defeat?
My argument was patently clear from the start. Keywords included "profit" and "shareholder". The fact that Agathon waffled around fabulously, from US media to ethics, does nothing but solidify the idea that he fled from a debate he had no choice in.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|