 |
| |
|
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999
time: 23:33
|
|
quote:
And yet that's not true. New York's more temperate weather, gretaer supply of fresh water, and much greater availability of food make is a much simpler place to live than the horribly arrid Khalahari, a place tough on any life. |
Correct, it doesn't take as much intelligence to survive in NYC except for the fact there are people and the Bushman will have to adapt to their system - and its the system that is much more complicated.
quote:
And Diamond's point about intelliegence is based on simply on natural selection. |
A similar argument - American blacks - was made by Roy Campanis (or some guy in the LA Dodger main office) to explain black dominance of sports but not the key management positions. They were genetically chosen via slavery for brawn, not brains. I think Diamond is just so used to western culture he takes it for granted when making comparisons.
New Guinea isn't exactly that demanding, at least westerners had Indians, bears and wolves chasing them around when they showed up here. Nice climate in New Guinea, lots of easy fishing. Does he document widespread eugenics? I doubt New Guineans were in the practice of killing off less smart people. That isn't the same as allowing the infirm to die off in hard times.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
There appears to be some confusion, in that some posters here and the documentarian are mixing up technological cognitive thought with the survival skills necessary to survive in an extreme environment. Quickness and immediacy of reaction to threats, a capacity for immediate violence when faced with the appropriate threat, an utter awareness of the senses including not just sight but smell, hearing, taste, and touch, etc. will be selected for in an extreme environment like the Kalahari, parts of the western coastal deserts of Chile, and parts of Australia.
Those traits may well have nothing to do with the intellectual ability to engage in higher mathematical reasoning or writing skills (though the verbal skills may be much better - all traditions are passed on via those), that would take a neurobiologist and modern PET scanning to see if there is a relationship. Einstein's generally inattentive, inner focused mind would have gotten him killed rapidly in the Kalahari, even with support.
More germane is that those extreme environments do nothing for disease resistance. Large cities can be pestholes, and without modern medicine can actually have negative internal population growth (they rely on immigration to support their numbers - NYC until the 20th century is one of the most notorious examples). And in fact it has been the disease resistance issue that has so often been the bane of peoples living in extreme environments that support smaller populations, ones too small to maintain a reservoir of infection, i.e like measles. Thus every new exposure starts a killing cycle again, unlike the larger cities where eventually resistance is bred for. That was even a problem in the Civil War, with soldiers from small agricultural towns being significantly less resistant to disease than their urban compatriots, even though the farm boys were bigger and stronger. Yet those farm boys died in substantially greater numbers from disease, especially during their initial months of deployment.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000
time: 06:33
|
|
After seeing it mentioned hundreds of times on this place, I once decided to acquire GGS. It's in my bookshelf now, too, yet I never completely read it.
Soon after I started reading I was bored by how he repeats himself over and over again, at least that was my impression from the first third of the book. The thesis itself was rather exciting, I shall have a detailed look at the discussion of you guys here.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
VetLegion
|
|
More importantly, is there a torrent I can download?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:33
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Berzerker
Correct, it doesn't take as much intelligence to survive in NYC except for the fact there are people and the Bushman will have to adapt to their system - and its the system that is much more complicated. |
While complicated, its not dangerous. The state makes sure to keep murder relatively low compared to the high murder rates among very primative groups.
quote:
A similar argument - American blacks - was made by Roy Campanis (or some guy in the LA Dodger main office) to explain black dominance of sports but not the key management positions. They were genetically chosen via slavery for brawn, not brains. I think Diamond is just so used to western culture he takes it for granted when making comparisons. |
That was not natural selection, but human-guided selection. There is a difference, a big difference.
quote:
New Guinea isn't exactly that demanding, at least westerners had Indians, bears and wolves chasing them around when they showed up here. Nice climate in New Guinea, lots of easy fishing. Does he document widespread eugenics? I doubt New Guineans were in the practice of killing off less smart people. That isn't the same as allowing the infirm to die off in hard times. |
What are you talking about? Living in jungles is extremely demanding- lots of things to kill you, and its very hard to find food.
Juts look at New Guineans- you don;t really see any fat, contended ones, or you didn;t in the show among those still caryring out subsistance farming.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GePap
|
|
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:33
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by shawnmmcc
There appears to be some confusion, in that some posters here and the documentarian are mixing up technological cognitive thought with the survival skills necessary to survive in an extreme environment. Quickness and immediacy of reaction to threats, a capacity for immediate violence when faced with the appropriate threat, an utter awareness of the senses including not just sight but smell, hearing, taste, and touch, etc. will be selected for in an extreme environment like the Kalahari, parts of the western coastal deserts of Chile, and parts of Australia.
Those traits may well have nothing to do with the intellectual ability to engage in higher mathematical reasoning or writing skills (though the verbal skills may be much better - all traditions are passed on via those), that would take a neurobiologist and modern PET scanning to see if there is a relationship. Einstein's generally inattentive, inner focused mind would have gotten him killed rapidly in the Kalahari, even with support. |
Oh, I agree that this is the correct way to challenge Diamond's claim that these people are "more intelligent", such a statement being based on your definition of "intelliegence".
But honestly, Eisntein is never a good example of anything, being so relatively out of the curve. Also, did Einstein have many kids?
quote:
More germane is that those extreme environments do nothing for disease resistance. Large cities can be pestholes, and without modern medicine can actually have negative internal population growth (they rely on immigration to support their numbers - NYC until the 20th century is one of the most notorious examples). And in fact it has been the disease resistance issue that has so often been the bane of peoples living in extreme environments that support smaller populations, ones too small to maintain a reservoir of infection, i.e like measles. Thus every new exposure starts a killing cycle again, unlike the larger cities where eventually resistance is bred for. That was even a problem in the Civil War, with soldiers from small agricultural towns being significantly less resistant to disease than their urban compatriots, even though the farm boys were bigger and stronger. Yet those farm boys died in substantially greater numbers from disease, especially during their initial months of deployment. |
Diamond does go into that- that being the "Germs" part of Germs, Guns, and Steel.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:33
|
|
i read the book, but am not following the miniseries.
The part on smart new guineans was short, and was one of the weaker parts of the book. The notion that New Guineans are more intelligent cause of Darwinian selection - that would imply that the period in which there is no survival advantage to intelligence in the West is long enough to allow for significant genetic change, which is doubtful, IIUC. It would have been better to leave it at the fact that he knows plenty of smart of New Guineans, etc. and you dont need IQ differences to account for macrohistorical patterns.
Ditto, the part about post - bronze age macrohistory, at the end of the book, was short, and also not that strong. On China, Ray Huang wrote a pretty good macrohistory. Why europe didnt unite is not all that clear. Despite the mountains and valleys and all, and the resulting linguistic fragmentation, etc there was a considerable trend to territorial consolidation from the middle ages up to the late 16th century. Ultimately the Hapsburg drive for dominance was defeated less by terrain than by balance of power politics, and by a number of historical accidents (what if Spanish policy in the Netherlands had been more intelligent, what if the armada had been better managed, What if Queen Bess had been less competent, what if a series of assasinations in France goes differently, what if Wallenstein lives, etc). Of course this begs the question of why balance of power did not keep China from reuniting after being divided several times - but a real comparison to Europe would require a detailed analysis of those individual times, not a handwave and blanket assertion that its the terrain.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:33
|
|
Regarding China, Diamond's thesis addresses specifically the rise and spread of civilization. Not the industrial revolution, etc. There are other factors involved in differences between East and West, but Diamond specifically didn't make any comprehensive analysis of them in GG&S. The last chapter was more or less a throwaway, but some of the ideas are compelling, i.e. lack of internal and external competition among the Chinese, Mughals, etc. hampering innovation.
Regarding the difference between hunter-gatherers' and civilized peoples' intelligence, we've only been civilized for several thousand years. That's not the timescale for very much genetic drift in terms of intelligence. Furthermore, who's to say that h-g's are not (as of several thousand years ago) already optimally intelligent for their environment?
As for GG&S (the book), there are a bunch of interesting ideas, but it's very repetitive and badly written.
And lotm stole my post. 
Last edited by Ramo on 12-07-2005 at 21:04
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JohnT
|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999
time: 00:33
|
|
quote:
Not really. China is a relatively flat- a conqueror can, with sufficient power, easily come to control the entire land of China. Many people have done so. NO State has ever had complete control over the area of Europe- its terrain (lost of natural barriers) has made it difficult for any single government to take over the whole. |
So? What does that have to do with the price of rice in China?
Here's the thing. If the Chinese Emperor had told Zheng He "Go East, young man!", followed by (as in the European example) the colonization of the "Americas" and the Sinocization of the world, their Diamond equivalent would be arguing that China really had no choice but to find herself on the forefront of global modernization because of her monolithic status, the "ability to command vast resources at her whim."* In fact, the Chinese Diamond would argue that Europe couldn't have done it because the mountain ranges made political Europe "too fragmented", her resources "too poorly distributed" to allow any one of the nations to be at the forefront of modernization.
*That's an ironic quote, btw, which is different from an actual quote. Just FYI.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33.
Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005 10:04
) 
Attachment: 
|
|
