 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:37
|
|
This is awesome! It's like I'm on a drug talking to the Cheshire Cat! ...pulls up a chair, gets popcorn... Is this a train wreck or a burgeoning love story? Yin unpresses the pause button and sees if the following replay of court testimony leaves any clues...
Exhibit A: Lord quotes me:
quote: quote:
Originally posted by yin26
Man. I love quoting so much of myself with you! Keeps me deeply engaged: |
Exhibit B: Lord quotes me again in the same post:
quote: quote:
4. While my sense is that this is something an intern could fix and wouldn't therefore jeopardize work being done on the AI, etc., if push came to shove, this is a low priority as long as there's an understanding to fix it down the road. |
Exhibit C: Lord ends these two quotes with the following:
quote: Har, har, har. If you stated your opinion once, why do you state it again afterwards in a slightly different manner? |
Exhibit D: Oh, the plot twists don't stop there! He claims a few moments later:
quote: That's interesting, considering I was replying to sophist and not you. |
Nope...he wasn't replying to me at all! He was just using my quotes to get back at Sophist. Genius. Ladies and gentlemen of the court, I submit to you that Sophist did it in the Library with the candle stick!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Nuclear
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lord Nuclear
I have my doubts that there is anything like a "geography/history researcher." Firaxis isn't Blizzard or Bioware, and I'm sure they have a fairly tight budget. I think you over-estimate the amount of people that would be willing to research around 720 names, and they run the risk of people leaking the information. This isn't about the capital of Russia, it's about obscure cities that the average person wouldn't know about. |
Apparently you are confused, Yin. I replied this to sophist, but for some reason you replied to me stating "Once again, the Intern." Posting an elaborated opinion, then posting a small opinion strikes me as rather odd. You were the one who responded to something I said to sophist, not the other way around. Once again, I'm going to tell you to read the thread from the top to bottom, not vice-versa.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
sophist
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lord Nuclear
I have my doubts that there is anything like a "geography/history researcher." Firaxis isn't Blizzard or Bioware, and I'm sure they have a fairly tight budget. I think you over-estimate the amount of people that would be willing to research around 720 names, and they run the risk of people leaking the information. This isn't about the capital of Russia, it's about obscure cities that the average person wouldn't know about. |
That assumes that there's one person who does all of the research. I can't think of a reason to do it that way. Besides, even if that was the case, there's no reason not to open it up to community discussion long in advance. It's the sort of thing that a platoon of Apolyton posters would get done in about 12 hours.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sophist
|
|
It's much less work to approve than to do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LordShiva
|
 |
Washington, DC and Bangalore, India
Aug 2002 time: 00:37
|
|
Well, given that, at least for India, the names are just plain wrong (and obviously not researched), approving an Apolytoner's list after glancing at a map or doing a Google search wouldn't be problematic at all.
My point is, Civ 4 needs to be as polished as possible. The developers have to keep doing what they're good at - working on AI etc. But, like you said, Firaxis isn't Blizzard, and there are bound to be some areas, especially things like foreign cultures etc. in a game of global scope, that are unfamiliar to the developers. In such instances, a wider community (eg. Apolyton) can help, and I'm sure Firaxis would appreciate the "proof-reading" suggestions we offer (definitely more than "Hey, I think you need to rip this feature out and replace it with this").
Indian cities is something I know about, so I posted a better list. Others have probably noticed inaccuracies in other parts of the game (cities of other civs? leader names? civilopedia entries?), and should post them too. It can't do any harm.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sophist
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lord Nuclear
Only slightly less work. They'd still need to re-check to see if the sources are reliable, and then to see if the Apolytoner's work is accurate based on the source. And since there would probably be multiple versions and arguments on the lists, how would Firaxis choose? The only way to do so would be to research the cities anyways. |
Apolytoners plural. They wouldn't need to completely check the work because they could rely on the community to do that for them. If there's a hint that one is wrong, someone would point it out. I think you underestimate the reliability of the community in doing something like this. Yeah, maybe it wouldn't be perfect, but it'd be a substantial improvement. I don't see where the problem is. The choice is between something sucky and something good (but not perfect) at little cost.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sophist
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
Equally, the names for cities in India ae the older inaccurate British Empire ones- Bombay, Calcutta, and so on.
|
Inaccurate might a little strong. Those names are still in common usage.
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
And would you really want to see Celtic cities or sites in the original ? Almost as bad in some cases as the American Indian languages.
|
I think it would be pretty funny to have city names like Crwthnmbwlc.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|