 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:37
|
|
I don't like a trade war but there comes a point when you have to assess the longer term. If the US can ignore NAFTA here with no consequences what will stop them from doing so again?
Is there any way we could slap a tariff on natural gas that had to be PAID by the US consumers. I want the 4 billion dollars
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Of course we can. We're allowed to put export taxes on whatever we want. But the federal gov't is trying to avoid pissing off Alberta... |
How about electricity. Does BC export as much to the states as Quebec does?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:37
|
|
The irony is that Canada would be better off if it stopped clear cutting tree in order to mass produce cheap 2x4s.
More jobs would be created in Canada through selective cutting of high quality lumber that could be used in Canadian factories too make other products.
The problem is the Canadian logging industry isn't willing to invest in new sawmills that can produce high quality lumber.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
To be fair, Canada was quick to jump to aid our allies in both World Wars when they broke out.
It was the US that sat on their asses until they were attacked before getting the balls to fight. |
Yeah and generally it begins with the US being horrifically unprepared for an attack.
Canada steps up when we see the cause as just. Thats why we have troops in Afghanistan ( you know . . . that place where AQ ACTUALLY WAS (and is).
Also . . we manage to be every bit as free as the Americans without being hated anywhere near as much worldwide ( some of that is superpower envy but not all of it)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:37
|
|
This lumber thing is an example-- because the US is big and powerful, the attitudeseems to be "screw Canada and screw any panel decision we don't like"
So we don't SELL timberlands to forestry interests-- DEAL with it !!
Oh and please send 4.1 billion dollars
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:37
|
|
What generally drives imports and exports to more or less match anyway? It seems to me as if they are driven by entirely different consumers and there doesn't seem to be anything to cause them to relate to each other directly or even indirectly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
techumseh
|
 |
of the frozen North.
Apr 1999 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
But yeah, I'd be in favour of putting an export tax on all energy products to the US until this is resolved. Hydro, oil, natural gas, coal.
Do it on an increasing basis. Start at a dollar a barrel, and move from there... |
I think the Government is thinking corn. :http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv...Story/National/
In any event, you don't want to use an export tax, which simply makes your commodity uncompetative. Adding tariffs makes the other guy's commodity uncompetative.
Last edited by techumseh on 25-08-2005 at 07:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|