 |
|  |
 |
|
John-SJ
|
|
Silicon Valley, USA
Aug 1999 time: 21:14
|
|
The amount of time that I am able to spend on EU is far less than I would desire anyway, so my recent experience was all the more frustrating!
I started a GC game as Spain, played for awhile, then saved and quit. Next day, started save game, played, quit for dinner. Came back after dinner and started decided to take the ships I had out of port and take them out for a spin. To my surprise when I clicked on the port, right clicked on a sea zone and then waited for the ships to arrive, when they arrived they were invisible! I could see the selection oval around where the ships should have been but no ships! As long as they were selected I could move them, but as soon as they were deselected I could never access them again. The next (and last) indication of the location of my ships was the sinking animation.
I started experimenting and found that some other save games had the same problem, and if I played on a game without the problem it eventually would (or could) develop it as well. I thought I had a video problem, I thought the game must be full of bugs, I thought a lot of things. I updated my drivers, tried playing with acceleration off, tried setting my desktop to 800x600 (blecch!) before starting the game, I even reinstalled the game!. Altogether I spent over 2 full (and FRUSTRATING) days trying to figure out how I could work around the problem. Finally I discovered that the problem was simply that before I took my fleets out of harbor I had switched the map to political view! In that view PART of the ship graphics are displayed, but not the most important part!
Man, was I relieved to find out the problem was as simple as that. I was very close to uninstalling the game and trying to sell it! Glad I get to play it instead, EU is a great game! (if confusing at times)
John-SJ
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ravagon
|
|
Australia
Sep 1999 time: 13:14
|
|
Ouch! Sounds nasty. John, I'm making a copy of your post to keep on my hard drive for when I finally manage to get a copy of EU. Have you checked the EU forums or notified tech support by any chance, as this sounds like the sort of thing they were planning to fix in 1.08?
[Edit: coz sometimes I just can't punctuate for peanuts]
[This message has been edited by ravagon (edited March 09, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
I too have had little time to spend on EU. I haven't even managed to finish the tutorial. I 've got to find a way to keep the woodpeckers from eating my house, and it's time to start doing the taxes. It's going to be a few weeks before I can get into the game.
I've been reading the manual, and I have aquestion. According to the manual there are places, such as Africa, where it is difficult to colonize, but it is possible to set up a trading post. The problem with that approach is that a colony can eventually put up a fort, but I don't see where it is possible for a trading post to do so, so trading posts seem to be extremely vulnerable. This would appear to be a historical inaccuracy in the game, because European trading posts throughout the world were often well fortified.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kautilya
|
|
St Louis, MO
Feb 2000 time: 23:14
|
|
Hmm the EU interface can be incredibly annoying at first. ( the way the religion screen is hidden in particular is a stroke of perverse genius) but it is OK once you get used to it.
I don't think it makes sense giving up this game because of two fairly minor bugs.(not even bugs really). And in genral my experience is that if you encounter a problem, unless it completely cripples the game play , it is best to move on and continue to fiddle around. Usually you will find the solution without trying just by accident. That eliminates the frustration of spending hours just trying to figure out one thing which is definitely a chore.
Frankly I think EU is superior to Civ2 both in its realistic historical modelling and in the fact that it avoids a lot of what I found extremely tedious micromanagement in Civ.
Once you have got over your frustration I suggest you give EU another try over a weekend.
BTW in case you haven't seen it this is a nice FAQ by Oranje from the EU forums: http://home.hetnet.nl/~copia-fs/faq/index.htm
It answered a few of the interface questions I had and is a good complement to the manual.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
John-SJ
|
|
Silicon Valley, USA
Aug 1999 time: 21:14
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Steve Clark on 03-11-2001 11:40 AM
John-SJ, my friend, sorry for the knee-jerk reaction. It's not a generational thing since you and I are both 40+.
 |
No problem. With my response I was basically having a bit of fun. 
quote:

Why people love games like The Sims or the upcoming BW is beyond my comprehension. But we all have different interests, so that's cool (as long as I don't have to hear Imran keep trolling about BW ).
 |

quote:

EU is a game that takes some effort. I have no problems technically or with the UI or anything else, it's just the 'hook' hasn't got there yet for me. I am anxious to play the Amer Rev. scenario, since I know it'll be better than the Civ2, which I liked.
 |
I'm sure I'll be trying EU again in the future (sorry Yin) and I hope we can both find that "hook".
BTW, stop by the Civ II General forum sometime and considering getting into one of the "Succession Games". I'm playing in 2 right now and they are a BLAST! These games are different in that you can't play a whole game with a single strategy. Since other players are involved you face many of the same problems that a national leader faces, desiring to institute his own policies, but in a limited time, and having to "clean up" after the previous leader whose policies are no doubt different than yours. Check it out sometime, these games offer a unique, and FUN, challenge.
John-SJ
|
|
|  |
 |
|
John-SJ
|
|
Silicon Valley, USA
Aug 1999 time: 21:14
|
|
"I would blame Combat Mission for forever screwing up my view on this."
You said it! The term "being there" could have been coined specifically for that game. Nobody has gotten the concept of being there any better than Combat Mission!
John-SJ
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Steve Clark
|
 |
Colorado Springs, CO
Oct 1999 time: 22:14
|
|
I just chalk it up to youthful exuberance. 
Let me add what I wrote in another forum about this...
quote:

I have reached the point that nowadays (esp. with a new PC), I want and need to be on the ground when playing (the "Being There" factor). I don't mind (and love) playing Civ2 and Pharaoh looking down, but that's it. Every other game, now and forevermore, I must have some views from the ground-level.
It all goes back to one thing...Combat Mission. For a long, long time, grognards played all sorts of wargames looking down on a hex-based (or similar) battlefield (or ocean). Then along came the total revolutionary Combat Mission which took the same style of gameplay and puts you directly on the battlefield, with all of its accurate sights and sounds. This is why they said that CM killed the wargame because once you're there, you can't go back.
I would also say it's the same for action/adventure/rpg games. Why anyone would play Diablo II looking down instead of many of the other RPGs where you have a FP/3P-view, is beyond me (if you're into that sort of thing). That's why I had no interest in CutThroats but immediately latched onto Sea Dogs. Why play Gangsters II looking down when you can 'Be There' playing Mafia? If Civ2 was Xs and Os on a grid, it will still be fun; but for Civ3, we are expecting it to feel like you are in that world and care about what's happening (just like I do playing Pharaoh). I can't quite say that for EU yet.
 |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:14
|
|
Yin,
I don't remember anyone (well, Depp maybe) saying EU was the best strategy game ever on this site. Me, John-SJ, and (perhaps) Steve, I know were asking for one because the game was very Civ-like.
Hell, I'll still play the game now and again, and this forum will still get its posts (certainly outdid the Dino's forum).
Perhaps you should clarify your remarks and say who are those you "can't trust". It'd have to be a European, because when we clamored for a forum (with some interesting thinking by John ) the game wasn't out in the US.
I just wonder if you even know what the Hell you are talking about?
(edit) This can help jog your memory, if need be:
http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum20/HTML/001339.html?37
[This message has been edited by Imran Siddiqui (edited March 11, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
John-SJ
|
|
Silicon Valley, USA
Aug 1999 time: 21:14
|
|
Yin, To whom are you speaking? I don't think anyone has said that they are giving up on the game. Did I miss something?
John-SJ
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|