02-09-2001 03:13									#1
	Slav Civs Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Being a Slav myself, I am interested if anyone knows what, if any, civilizations, apart from Russians, will be included in the game or scenarios or mod-packs?

	02-09-2001 03:47									#2
	Re: Slav Civs Increase Your PM Length

quote: Originally posted by Cybergod Being a Slav myself, I am interested if anyone knows what, if any, civilizations, apart from Russians, will be included in the game or scenarios or mod-packs?

Dont think so. But civ-edit possibilities will be very newbie-friendly (with the exception for graphics which requires some artistic talent). But other then that, you can tailocut your own civs, or download civ-modpacks from the internet. Or wait for Civ-3 expansion-updates with new added civs (compare with added factions in SMAC Alien Crossfire).

	02-09-2001 19:34									#3
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Thanx! I just hope the "editor" doesn't turn out to be a piece of crap like "SMAC Faction Editor" - it is so bad that it crashed my games eternally, until I learned to do the tweaking myself...

	02-09-2001 19:39									#4
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote: Originally posted by Cybergod Thanx! I just hope the "editor" doesn't turn out to be a piece of crap like "SMAC Faction Editor" - it is so bad that it crashed my games eternally, until I learned to do the tweaking myself...

Trust in Firaxis! They have said that their editors are really powerful, and user-friendly this time.

	04-09-2001 10:57									#5
	Tired of ads?

I don't see why there should be more than 1 Slavic civ in Civ 3 given that many older and more famous ones couldn't make it.

	04-09-2001 22:28									#6
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Because you cannot classify every single Slavic nation as Russian . There were/are some conflicts between individual slavic nation on the counts of the past near histrory (namely forced communism by Russians and the invasion of Poland).

By this I am not justifying that it should replace other "more famous and older" civ but just making a tiny point.

	05-09-2001 04:35									#7
	Remove this text

Good, historical slavic civs:

Poland
The Mighty Kingdom of Lithuania
UKRAINE
Russia
Yugoslavia (Just a generalization )

	06-09-2001 01:48									#8
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Poland

Poland's important but not top 16 important.

The Mighty Kingdom of Lithuania

They are Balts, dumbass.

UKRAINE

Kievan Rus?

Russia

Russia is already included.

Yugoslavia

Slovenes, Croats, Bosnians, Herzegovinians (?), and Serbs.


You forgot to mention the Bulgars and the Moravians/Bohemians/Slovaks.

	06-09-2001 02:38									#9
	Support Apolyton

quote: Originally posted by St Leo Yugoslavia Slovenes, Croats, Bosnians, Herzegovinians (?), and Serbs. You forgot to mention the Bulgars and the Moravians/Bohemians/Slovaks.

Whoa, be careful there. Bulgarians are not Slavs, they adopted the Christian Orthodoxy in the Middle Ages from their neighbouring Serb and Byzantine kingdoms, but they are not descendants from the slavic family. This is not to say that they do not deserve to be put in the game aswell

Also, about Yugoslavia. You CANNOT have a civ named Yugoslavia. See why...

After the WW1, Serbs united Montenegro, Bosnia, Croatia, Slovenia and Macedonia under a Yugoslav Kingdom, which turned into a federation after the communist takeover after WW2. And ofcourse, you know what happened in the 90s...

So from that federation you might have the two of the most prominent - Serbia (10 million) and Croatia (don't know the number, prob. around 8 million). (Slovenia has only 2 million people, while Montenegro has just 600,000 and I don't know the pop of Bosnia or Macedonia)

	06-09-2001 05:28									#10
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I know why you cannot have a civ named "Yugoslavia"... I was being Ironic

Lithuania has many slavic members in it.

Yes, Kievan Rus

I was just listing as many as I could in 30 seconds... sort of like an exercise

	06-09-2001 11:05									#11
	Increase the size of your Attachments

Growing up in Chicago, I knew many "Lugans" as the Lithuanians called themselves. I even dated an "off the boat" Lugan girl. The ones I knew were VERY Roman Catholic and seemed to be an odd and contradictory mix between Poles and Gremans. This makes sense, as history might tell us that modern Lithuaninans resulted from intermarriage between the native Slavs and invading Teutonic Crusaders and settlers.

	06-09-2001 15:33									#12
	Full PM-box? Change here!

Well, how about the Romanians? I think they're not Slavs, more like gypsies
But the inclusion of Romanians would cause some mix-ups with the Romans

	06-09-2001 19:42									#13
	Put an end to popups!

quote: Originally posted by aaglo Well, how about the Romanians? I think they're not Slavs, more like gypsies But the inclusion of Romanians would cause some mix-ups with the Romans

watch out for Romanian posters.. onslaught is coming...

gypsies are no closer to Romanians that to your own nationality whatever it is...

	06-09-2001 21:18									#14
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Isn't Bulgarian a Slavic language? I think it's related to Macedonian, and the Macedonians are Slavs, right?

Maybe they are not Slavs, but still speaking a Slavic language?

	06-09-2001 22:35									#15
	Remove this text

quote: Originally posted by Gangerolf Isn't Bulgarian a Slavic language? I think it's related to Macedonian, and the Macedonians are Slavs, right? Maybe they are not Slavs, but still speaking a Slavic language?

There isn't a so-called "slavic language", but Russian, Bulgarian, Serbian, Polish, Macedonian, etc. Have evolved in their own idividual ways because of the Greek priests and the Greek Orthoox church which was spreading it's religious and lingual influence throughout all the slavic lands. All the language have their own native alterations but they are all pretty similar (and resemble faint similarities to Greek).

Edit: Spelling

	07-09-2001 05:04									#16
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

There isn't a so-called "slavic language"

I think he meant it in the sense similar to "romance language" or "germanic language".

This makes sense, as history might tell us that modern Lithuaninans resulted from intermarriage between the native Slavs and invading Teutonic Crusaders and settlers.

I assure you that we Balts split from the Slavs long before the Teutonic Knights conquered the Baltic seaboard.

Lithuania has many slavic members in it.

Had. It conquered Belorus before merging with Poland.

	07-09-2001 15:00									#17
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote: Originally posted by OneFootInTheGrave ...watch out for Romanian posters.. onslaught is coming...

Yeah, my mistake. I just wasn't thinking clearly. People living in Romania are Romanians, of course. And gypsy is a race (I feel another onslaught incoming... ). But there are a lot of gypsies in Romania, so that got me

I hope I didn't rise anyone's blood pressure with my previous post

	08-09-2001 02:22									#18
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote: Originally posted by St Leo There isn't a so-called "slavic language" I think he meant it in the sense similar to "romance language" or "germanic language". I assure you that we Balts split from the Slavs long before the Teutonic Knights conquered the Baltic seaboard.

Does anyone know what "Church Slavonic" is? Is this the mother language of St. Cyril's alphabet? As for the origns of the Balts, I am out of my primary fields here and bow to St. Leo's reasonable post.

	08-09-2001 04:09									#19
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote: I think he meant it in the sense similar to "romance language" or "germanic language".

That is exactly what I meant

So Cybergod, what is your definition of Slavic then? You say that Bulgarians are not Slavs, but that their language is related to other Slavic languages?

	08-09-2001 14:45									#20
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

So far as I know the Bulgarians are a mix of the Slavs (the bigger part) and of the Protobulgars (Turkic people).

The Protobulgars (nomads from asia) conquered the Slavs and founded Bulgaria in 680.

Bulgarian language is slavonic.

	08-09-2001 15:01									#21
	Support Apolyton

Lithuanians (and Latvians) are not a mix of Germans and Poles. They are a different indoeuropean group, neither Germanic nor Slavonic.

But their language, culture and also their ethnic composition were influenced by Germans and Slavs.
-------------------
BTW, now the Latvian population contains a lot of Russians (40%), but only Latvian is the official language. It is a clear violation of human rights. But nobody from the EU officials wants to notice it.

	08-09-2001 16:41									#22
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote: Originally posted by redfox74 So far as I know the Bulgarians are a mix of the Slavs (the bigger part) and of the Protobulgars (Turkic people). The Protobulgars (nomads from asia) conquered the Slavs and founded Bulgaria in 680. Bulgarian language is slavonic.

That's strange, since the Slavs only arrived to the Balkans in the 7th centure AD ...

Gangerolf, READ MY POSTS! The languages in Russia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland, etc. evolved from the Greek language which was spead by St. Cyrill and St. Methodius (or something, I fogot ). Yes, they all have the similar sence and meanings but if you ask a, say, Russian something in, say, Serbian, they wouldn't make heads or tales out of it!

	08-09-2001 19:27									#23
	Get a bigger avatar today!

quote: That's strange, since the Slavs only arrived to the Balkans in the 7th centure AD

The Slavs arrived to the Balkans in the beginning of the 6th century, founded their villages in the end of the 6th - beginning of the 7th century. In the middle of this century they founded the Union of the 7 slavonic tribes - the first slavonic "state" on the Balkans.

Protobulgars (nomadic Turkic tribe with good army of horsemen) with their leader Khan Asparukh came in 680, won against a bysantinian army and founded Bulgaria. The Union of the 7 tribes could not stand against the newcomers and accepted their government.

-----------

quote: The languages in Russia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland, etc. evolved from the Greek language which was spead by St. Cyrill and St. Methodius

The languages were there before Cyrill and Methodius. They are really original slavonic and not greek! Cyrill and Methodius translated the bible using the greek alphabet with some new letters they created to match the slavonic sounds. The cyrillic alphabet (NOT the languages) are from the Greeks. BTW, it was not the first alphabet used by Slavs, they used some runes before.

	08-09-2001 19:58									#24
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

The Bulgars weren't originally Slavs, but after a long period of contact with Slavs they eventually adopted a Slavic language, which evolved into Modern Bulgarian. So Bulgars aren't really Slavic, but they speak a Slavic language.

The Slavic languages did not evolve from Greek! They were completely separate branches of the Indo-European languages. But the Cyrillic alphabet that Russians, Ukrainians etc use was adapted from the Greek alphabet. But that's just the alphabet, not the whole language (vocabulary, grammar, structure etc.)

As for the Lithuanians, they are an entirely separate branch from the Germanic, Slavic etc. The Lithuanian language together with Latvian belong to the Baltic branch, though longterm contact with the Germanics and Slavics have influenced Lithuanian culture and language a lot.

From Encyclopedia.com:
"Slavic languages, also called Slavonic languages, a subfamily of the Indo-European family of languages. Because the Slavic group of languages seems to be closer to the Baltic group than to any other, some scholars combine the two in a Balto-Slavic subfamily of the Indo-European classification. "
and
"The Bulgars appeared on the Middle Volga by the 8th cent. and became known as the Eastern, Volga, or Kama Bulgars. Another branch of the same people moved west into present Bulgaria and merged with the Slavs."

Last edited by ranskaldan on 09-09-2001 at 06:37

	08-09-2001 21:04									#25
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by Cybergod That's strange, since the Slavs only arrived to the Balkans in the 7th centure AD ... Gangerolf, READ MY POSTS! The languages in Russia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland, etc. evolved from the Greek language which was spead by St. Cyrill and St. Methodius (or something, I fogot ). Yes, they all have the similar sence and meanings but if you ask a, say, Russian something in, say, Serbian, they wouldn't make heads or tales out of it!

Also, Cyrill and Methodius did not make it to every Slavic nation. The fact is neither Poland nor Bohemia uses the Cyrillic alphabet but the Latin one. There was never any Greek influence in both countries neither - Christianity was adopted from Germany, not Byzantium.

	09-09-2001 05:12									#26
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

BTW, now the Latvian population contains a lot of Russians (40%), but only Latvian is the official language. It is a clear violation of human rights. But nobody from the EU officials wants to notice it.

That's either a form of revenge for not making Latvian co-official until 1989 or a questionable way of discouraging Russian imperialism. Nowadays, I reside and Canada having emigrated from Latvia @ 11 so I don't have any more insight into the issue.

	09-09-2001 06:35									#27
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

The Polish and Czechs got Christianity from western Europe, thus they are Catholic and use the Roman Alphabet. The Russians and Serbs got Christianity from the Byzantines, thus they are Orthodox and use the Cyrillic Alphabet. But the languages themselves are Slavic, it's just the way it's written (the alphabet) that was linked to religion (Catholic or Orthodox).

Last edited by ranskaldan on 09-09-2001 at 06:41

	09-09-2001 07:15									#28
	Tired of ads?

POLAND IS TOP 16 IMPORTANT. ARE YOU INSANE?

Poland participated in almost every large scale European war.

sure, they may have gotten beat during most of them, but they were still there fighting.

again, props to the Polskas

	09-09-2001 07:42									#29
	Put an end to popups!

Yes, Poland deserves to be in the 16 civs for a scenario. Especially one for the 1500s. Poland-Lithuania was the largest nation in Europe at the time.

	09-09-2001 16:39									#30
	Support Apolyton

**Looks at the posts and wonders how little he knew about his ethnic background**

"D'oh!"

Anyway, I don't understand either why Poland wasn't chosen to be in Civ3. OH well, I guess Firaxis wasn't so fond of the Poles