 |
|
|
Great idea!!(the GL)
But dont forget to make it also in :
a) downloadable HTML format(without ads and stuff).
b) printer friedly version
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
inca911
|
|
St. Paul, MN
Jan 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
OK, so is anyone tasked with performing any specific actions yet? I see a lot of good discussions, and a few submissions have appeared, but has anyone identified the tasks that must be completed to move this project forward? I would propose an October 15th opening of the Library with these project milestones:
SG (the Great Librarian) compiles a first draft of Library ideas to date (without any new suggestions, for now) perhaps by the end of this month...? A working draft can then be placed online so a panel of reviewers (see below for more info) can look for gross omissions and false information. The intent of this draft is not to get everything included immediately! The feature creep on such a task would be hideous. The intent of this first draft is to encompass the solid, well-known Civ nomenclature, facts and tips to provide a document that can be used to open the Library and that can be used to establish a meaningful first format that Mark/Dave/Webmaster/??? can use to create the Library's home. I recommend that the working draft be reviewed both for content, and for Library filing topics (e.g. OCC, Trade, ICS, etc). The filing topics review should be completed by October 7. The content review should be completed by October 10, allowing 5 days for general tidying up of the word doc prior to the Library's opening.
Upon review of the first draft, Mark/Dave/Webmaster/??? creates a suitalbe home for this MSWord? document to reside on Apolyton. It doesn't need to be perfectly formatted yet, but the formatting review should be helpful. Formatting can be refined in time adding appropriate index topics and the like once the subject matter is better known. I think this task will take less than a couple of days, but a week is assigned to it to allow for some flex in intial formatting options.
A small review panel--say 5 people--is established for review of the intial library postings and for new submissions. I recommend a vote thread be started immediately to name the panel. However, the Librarian is automatically included in this panel so the voting will be for the 4 other panel members. I nominate Ming, Xin Yu, Paul and MarkG. Any objections or other nominations? If the majority of these 5 people agree to the content of a new submission thread, then the Librarian cleans up the submission for better organization and formatting and emails it for review to the panel one last time. If the majority are ok with the final version, it gets put in by Mark/Dave/Webmaster/???.
Future submissions are started via Great Library suggestions threads (as is already being done!). If enough positive votes are posted by the panel members, then the topic gets in. If enough negative votes are posted by the panel members, then the topic stays out. A timeline is placed on a new submission and is posted so appropriate review and feedback can occur in a timely fashion. 2 weeks should be appropriate.
Well, that's my $0.02. This is only a suggestion of a project timeline. If the times are unreasonable, just figure out where help must go to bring the schedule in. I can certainly help SG with document creation, review, and formatting if that area is too tight for the schedule. I think the website creation is an ongoing task for Mark/Dave/Webmaster/??? and that is a big reason Mark would be a good addition to the panel. It is critical that the persons responsible for doing the work also have the authority to accomplish their tasks. I also recommend that we decide on a person to organize the details of opening this Library on time and to perform tasks to help accomplish this goal (such as opening a panel voting thread). We can build all the consensus that we want, but unless there is clear leadership, consensus is the only thing that will get built on time! Any comments or alternate proposals?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
SCG
|
 |
of less than all that I see
Jun 2000 time: 00:12
|
|
If you look hard enough, you'll find a few posters who said they go straight to early republic. I know because back in early june when i found this site, I did just that I also stated that I couldn't remember the last time I had built the hanging gardens (I've since built it in a couple OCC games) More often than not i tended to conquer (incite revolt) JSB and MC rather than building them too since i always had more pressing things to research, like railroad, which of course obsoletes the HG. Of course I've also come out and said that I wasn't planning on writing up any guides atm also, so feel free to write one 
With more than a couple cities, it always made sense to me to go straight to republic for the trade - monarchy was just so trade-deficient - and with enough marketplaces/banks/stock exchanges and entertainers, I could still celebrate even without the 'essential' happiness wonders. Of course I've also since figured out that part of that was because of the unusual situations that arise when you have the double-unhappy faces .
Since I started playing OCC more, I've taken advantage of the WLTKD in monarchy (republic trade without the pop growth) and the anarchyless revolutions to speed the transition to republic For expansive empires though, i still tend to bypass monarchy. I always have been one to fight defensive wars, and you don't need a lot of units to do that 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ribannah
|
 |
The Netherlands, Embassy of the Iroquois Confederacy
Aug 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Simpson II on 09-12-2000 07:33 PM
I might take up the perfectionist quill over the next couple of days. I've been browsing the archives, and it's obvious no-one uses an early republic.. I saw someone say that it was impossible to WLTCD in a size 5 city without HG, and no-one contradicted him.
 |
I have gone to Republic ASAP in several OCC games recently, and it seems to work rather well. Especially an early Library speeds up research quite a bit. The typical order is: Warriors, Library, Republic, disband Warriors (hopefully you have found some none-units by then), Colossus, meanwhile growing to size 3, Temple (by then you'll have Mysticism), WLtCD to size 7 while building a Marketplace, normal growth to size 8 soon to follow. Hanging Gardens can be a great bonus (if you start out with Pottery, but no Bronze Working, building the HG first is almost as good), but not absolutely necessary.
The statement "no WLtCD after size 5" must refer to a situation without Mysticism.
------------------
If you have no feet, don't walk on fire
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Simpson II
|
 |
varies
Jul 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Ribannah on 09-13-2000 10:44 AM
The statement "no WLtCD after size 5" must refer to a situation without Mysticism.
 |
The guy who wanted to celebrate stated he had a temple, colusseum and cathedral in the city, so I don't think that was the problem. The other person replied that you couldn't celebrate on the odd numbers of population in republic - true in certain cases, but false in the general case.
Thanks for the OCC-plan, I'm still trying to get my early celebrations back to optimality - the rust is starting to give, though. 
SCG,
Yes, this site has the effect of getting a lot of people out of republican habits. I was the other way - I virtually ICSed until I found Apolyton! I always use monarchy for a short time first, though I imagine republic as no. 1 could be done. It slows my expansion a lot, though, and I still believe strongly in expanding quickly up to a point. First out, then.. up. 12 size 30s beats 100 size 2s any day (that the 100 cities aren't all supporting cavalry. )
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
inca911
|
|
St. Paul, MN
Jan 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Any activity going on? Anyone need help with anything? This is looking kind of stale to me....
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
|
Well, GL is a civ thing. Is there a GL in CtP? I haven't played it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Oh. I think I might have known that from somewhere. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|