 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
quote: Originally posted by EOL
No huts. I usually use 2.42 but have FW as well.
EOL |
Same here. In fact I have installed FW but not played at all yet ( too busy with the Rome and ww2 scenarios).
Sure we find some interesting challenges there, once we get started (the SGs seem to think that 'Napoleon' is worth having a look).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
Rome scenario
Tiny Hall of Fame
(without huts)
Romans (43 years): DaveV
Seleucids (72 years): La Fayette
Carthaginians (74 years): EOL
Macedonians (89 years): La Fayette
Tiny Hall of Fame #2
(tipping huts)
Seleucids (74 years): Marquis de Sodaq
Independent (92 years): Marquis de Sodaq
Ptolemaic (96 years): Marquis de Sodaq
Celts (99 years): Marquis de Sodaq
It is NOT asked to conquer all cities.
What is required is taking (or destroying) all 21 objectives.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Scouse Gits
- what do you think of the scenario? |
...kewl
There are 26 objective cities in that scenario, and that is fine for me.
I don't know if there are many people who are fond of micromanaging 100 cities or so, and spending more than 1 hour/turn. Personally, I am not (and in fact I have not played any big map for quite a long time, ...except ww2 because of the challenge ).
The map in the Napoleon scenario looks quite big, but less than 1/2 of it is really active, hence no boring endgame (34 turns needed to conquer all 26 objectives, and about 15 minutes/turn:
it was almost an 8 hours game).
I could not resist building strong trade routes and a navy (especially since Admiral Nelson had a very powerful batttleship (defence = 8!), but he commited suicide quite soon, attacking the mighty coastal fortress that I had been wary enough to build in Alexandria).
If I play it again, I shall make it shorter by using a more 'Davelike' {TM} strategy (aggressive from the very start).

|
|
|  |
 |
|
DrFell
|
|
Gave this a go this afternoon using Romans, this time using capture capitals + bribe cities method (thanks Xin), and completed it by 238 BC (40 turns). Could've been done faster too, if it wasnt for my clumsiness (didnt realise Raphia was an objective, then sent a diplo to bribe it and found out it was the cap, so i took a few turns building + transporting an attack force). Can't really be compared to DaveV's record, as I went for objective cities only (not a ship chain in sight though ).
I didn't bother getting elephants on this one, keeping cease fire then provoking war seemed the best way (lost a ton of units outside Alexandria though due to a sneak attack). A good strategy seems to be attacking Greece first - Pella is very easy to destroy, a couple vet legions, catapult and a diplo will do nicely. While doing that you can also send another force down to take Syracuse + Carthage. This makes all Greece Cheaply bribable. Build units in Greece and send em off to take Antioch, whilst using the army left over from the Carthage invasion to take out Alexandria. Build Cats, Legions and Diplos in Italy and send 'em up to bribe Milan and capture La Tene. Bribe the remaining objectives. Suprising how quick it can be done actually, good fun.
By the way, does anyone have the huts version they could send me? It'd be interesting to give it a go using huts and see the difference in times.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DrFell
|
|
Thanks for the scenario SG1 - I didn't think it would work either, but suprisingly it loads up in FW, and it has huts too! I might play it in MGE though, due to the AI agressiveness (I have a copy of TOT converted to MGE, but lacking the scenarios). This certainly makes the Celts + Carthaginians easier to play, as Romans I think I'll send a few horses over to Spain for a steady supply of cash+techs.
La Fayette - The thing is, this record could be smashed, if someone had a little better luck and was trying a bit more carefully than me. I just loaded up the scenario, started playing then realised how fast I'd conquered Greece and Carthage, and decided what the hell, I'll go for the record . If I'd gone for total conquest it would have taken much longer, so DaveV's total conquest record remains untouched, and I'm not going to be beating it anytime soon.
Next on my list - Rome as Romans with huts 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:12
|
|
I replayed this (hutless) scenario thrice over the weekend. Two new standards can be added to the Hall of Fame. I tried to recapture the Seleucid title - your honor remains, La Fayette, as I didn't get La Tene until 199bc, a 78 year outing.
One of my primary problems with shaving years off the conquest is the irresistible urge for total conquest. I'd start expanding outward, sacking everything in my path. This time I waltzed past non-objectives, unless they were in the way. Also, I've avoided bribing cities, just a personal preference.
With the Ptolomies, I captured the final objective, La Tene, in 194bc - an 83 year conquest.
The Independent Greeks sacked Memphis in 181bc - a 96 year conquest.
The poor Celts start in despotism. I suspect the hutless game, with no government change, might be too much for me. I just nipped the century mark with huts. I said in an earlier post that I didn't think huts made too much of a difference; I'd say that isn't true for the Celts and maybe the Independents. The latter have nowhere to grow and increase the production base except Gaul, which is swarming with hostile Gauls... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DrFell
|
|
There are two halls of fame, one with huts and one without. The 83 yr record in the hall of fame with huts still stands. The without huts hall of fame has been updated.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:12
|
|
Actually, look more closely. The hutless record is my 83 years, the record with huts is now 88, replacing my old 96 year game. Maybe you should fire up the scenario, win in 82 years, and make it all moot! Four civs have yet to be entered in the Hall at all. Have a go, it's fun!
La Fayette, yes, not changing government is crippling to the Celts. The monarchies do quite well, but despotism is hard to put up with, especially in those far flung cities. The corruption is terrible, production is weak.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DaveV
Due to not rereading this thread, I went for a total conquest victory instead of just capturing all the objective cities. |
How will I find out the objectives of a scenario?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|