 |
|  |
 |
|
Pembleton
|
|
Cyberspace
Apr 1999 time: 23:15
|
|
I am 33 years old. I pirated games until I was about 18 or so, and these games were for the Commodore 64. Throughout college and some time after, I stopped playing computer games until I was about 26 or so.
The point I'm making is that I can easily afford games now and there is no point for me to pirating games, but I couldn't even if I wanted to because I have a slow internet connection. When I was young, however, I had as much guilt pirating games as I did recording music. There was a computer programmer in my dorm who lived across the hall who told me once about how it was wrong to copy software but I just gave him a "what the hell?" look.
My theory is that those who mostly pirate games are those who are young and don't have much money. And as much as you try to convince them that it's wrong, it will fall on deaf ears. It is easy to rationalize what you are doing when you don't have money.
Don't misunderstand, pirating is a bad thing and hurts both the developers and the customers who then have to pay more for games and also deal with the hassle of copy-protection. But do you think all of this lecturing and preaching is going to do any good?
Pirating, just like recording music, and now the switch from Napster to Kazaa/Morpheus, will always exist and there isn't much you can do about it.
On the other hand, to the person who argued that he wants to test games, by from EB if you have one nearby. They allow you to return games. I'm glad because I would otherwise have been stuck with the really horrendous Black and White which I returned the next day after I bought it.
Also, I object to the argument you shouldn't pirate because it's *against the law*. This is silly. Do you have believe all laws should blindly be followed? How many people actually follow the speed limit? Do you think all the laws in oppressive nations such as China or muslim countries are right, no questions asked? The argument that you shouldn't pirate should be because it hurts developers and other customers, and that you are stealing from them. Not because it's against the law.
Last edited by Pembleton on 24-09-2001 at 18:33
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
tuckson
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rasbelin
My opinion is that abandonware should be considered as freeware
wihout customer support. You could distribute it freely, without
paying one singel dime. At this time we can already consider Civ as
abandonware, because nobody makes big profits or any at all with it.
Long live freeware and abandonware! |
Humbug...
Who the heck made up the äbandonware "thing"? There is no such thing as "abandonware" for free though. Just like any other thing that is protected by copyrights (like books and songs and stuff like that) the law states certain period for which the right is at force (sorry if this sounds funny, but I'm no native english speaker, so lawyer's english is not one of my strong points). At least over here in Holland it does.
This means that a song older than (for example, I don't know the exact time) 50 years is aged and so free of rights. But anything younger fallse under the copyright laws and therefor must be paid for. Even though the CD is no longer available, the singer is dead and the record company bankrupt. There's always someone who's got the "right"on the money.
For software there's no difference I guess. The only way software that's no longer produced, but still not is "aged", is free is when the people who own the rigths DECIDE it's free.
Nothing more, nothing less.
If "abandoneware" should become free of rights, this would mean a change in copyright laws.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
d_dudy
|
|
hasn't there been a discussion on this before? didn't ralf start it or something?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pembleton
|
|
Cyberspace
Apr 1999 time: 23:15
|
|
You mean Ralf was the first person ever to post about piracy? Wow, and I thought that I had already seen hundreds to thousands of threads on this and other forums on this issue.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jason Beaudoin
|
|
Canada
Jan 1970 time: 00:15
|
|
The simplest solution to piracy is making software affordable. I don't think that pricing software out of some people's price rage isn't productive at all.
I know that this open's a new debate, but the debate to pirate software or not is, as Wiglaf stated, completely redundant! Of course it isn't right, and of course it is considered stealing. The very great majority of people would agree to that, so it's hardly a debate.
I know that Firaxis doesn't have much control over pricing their own games, since they are outsourcing the publisher, but the key to countering piracy is to make the game affordable enough so that it wouldn't be worth to download it from a warez site.
I know one thing for sure, if games where about half the price they are now, I'd buy a lot more games. Not only are games expensive, but they're a total crap shoot, and as Ozymandous said, not all stores allow returns. So, if you can't buy from EBWorld, then most people that buy a bad game are screwed.
Brian Reynolds once said that 10% of the games out there make 90% of the money... well, I'm here to tell you Brian, that's because 90% of the games out there are good for the garbage.
To put things into perspective, I ask you this: Why does it cost me only about 25 dollars CDN to buy a multi-millioin dollar Hollywood movie on DVD, and 80 dollars CDN to buy a computer game? If you say it's because of the lack of audience for computer games, well then, are you trying to attract more players by selling at extremely high prices?
Debate that!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
smellymummy
|
|
wasn't it during clinton's admin that the laws concerning pirating was placed?
I'm no lawyer but it goes something like this.... if you have less than $1000 worth of copies software you're okay. If you have more, you're in trouble.
Also, is copying data illegal? I was always under the impression that it's illegal when you SELL a copy.
Another thing, I've never once read a solid statement that proves piracy hurts profits of a company. Okay copy protection costs money - but that's totally useless. As many here know, it's quite rare a copy protection scheme stays uncracked. Excluding that, some may argue that hundreds/thousands will download the software instead of buying it therefore creating a loss to the software company. That is so absurd! Granted some of those who will download "would" of bought the game, but in mosts cases no, except if it's exceptional. Just look at the trend of this thread:
Reading through the posts I've seen a few times stuff like "Sure i'll download it, but i'll buy once i can!" and so on.
The real problem with piracy is the loss of sales on the global market - which most game publishers do such a pathetic job at anyway. The piracy that hurts, is the bootleg cds (chinatown?), etc etc - not the juarez downloader. At worst the downloading will hurt ISP's in wasted bandwidth (833 iso downloads, about the full capacity of a t1..).
BTW, I've preordered this game. I never bought civ1, yet I played it extensively way back when on a mac, I played colonization from copied floppies, and I did originally pirate civ2 (so shoot me). However, as the years passed; I bought everything civ (mge, tot, smac, addons, ctp, etc).
Am I for piracy? No. Am I for the free exchange of information? Yes? Do I believe in supporting talent so I can expect better results in the future? Yes!
and that's all 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Simpleton
|
 |
Edmonton, Canada
Nov 2000 time: 22:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Remember Ashmodean, sometimes laws were not always put there for the wellbeing of everyone but to allow traps for the rich to get richer. |
Here, Here. I couldn't have said it better myself!!!
I personally have obtained "illegal" software from friends in the past in fact that's how I got CIV1. In this case the reason I bought Civ2 was because I got to play Civ1 and find out how good a game it was. So in this one case piracy has it's uses. There are so many games released you need an inexpensive way to be able to sift through the crap (ie. CTP and CTP2) to find a gem. No one could be expected to buy every game. I probably would have never played Civ1 had my friend not made me a copy. In effect, they may have lost money by me not buying Civ1 but they made money on my purchase of Civ2, Civ2 expansion packs and my eventual purchase of Civ3.
I think the companies that are most hurt by game piracy are the ones who consitantly put out crap (ie. Activision) as it should be.
That being said, in the past I may have supported piracy but no longer I now buy all my games even, unfortunately, CTP1 and CTP2. To protect myself from the crap I read many reviews on the product in question and then make my leap of faith.
Last edited by Simpleton on 25-09-2001 at 02:32
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I have bought civ 1, civ2, SMAC, and Civ2 MGE. Why am I going to download civ3? I don't have the money to buy a half done game only to have to buy the other half in a few months. I got raped a couple of times now by Sid Leiers half done games which he then conveniently releases the other half later on. Not this time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FuFu15
|
|
we'll compromise. i'll d/l the iso, and when multi comes out ill buy it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FuFu15
|
|
btw kaak, you're a ****ing idiot. that is all.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Moral Hazard
|
 |
of jack
Jul 1999 time: 01:15
|
|
I agree w/ Wiglaf that the topic really doesn't go anywhere.
A good question however is what should game companies do about it. Several options.
A. Follow the Quake III method, where you can't play online w/o a unique key.
B. Require registration of the game after XX days. Either via phone or internet. With a key being created via an algorithm based on the serial number of the game.
C. Added goodies for registered users. Only accesiable thru thier account.
D. A call home feature. (Invasion of Privacy?)
E. Encrypt the data raising the bar to casual copying.
Personally I never understood why game companies don't attempt to raise the bar against piracy more. Personally I like a mix of B and C.
Added: Of course all of these solutions only raise the bar; they don't eliminate the problem completely.
Last edited by Moral Hazard on 25-09-2001 at 06:53
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|