 |
|  |
 |
|
Jason Beaudoin
|
|
Canada
Jan 1970 time: 00:15
|
|
This message is for Firaxis:
There is some major dissent going on in these forums and I think your organization really needs to pay attention to what people are saying here and come up with a good response.
The key gripe that customers have is that you did indicate that this game would be multiplayer, and retailers did start taking pre-orders before you anounced that it wouldn't be in there. So, in a way, those customers that pre-ordered this game for the multiplayer portion of it are being treated unfairly. For those that want MP and bought the pre-release video are really screwed because they can't take that back.
More importantly, I believe you have insulted many fans (myself included) by the method in which your communications department allowed the news about MP to be released. Not only did you willful witheld that information, but you allowed the news to trickle out in a few lines of an interview, without any real explanation of what were the problems with implementing it now, or any direction of where you plan on taking MP.
These people are so devoted to your game and many are very loyal to your company. They deserve to be treated with a little more respect than what has been demonstrated in your most recent actions.
If anything, your company needs to develop better strategies to notify your most supportive fans of news that is obviously going to be dissappointing. Your communications department needs to think more stragically and develop better forcasting skills to understand the impact their methods of communicating with the public has on Firaxis' reputation.
This is a problem that has been ongoing with your company for quite some time because I remember back when I was the Web Master for Beyond Alpha Centauri (now the Apolyton SMAC site), communication between me and your company was a real issue. It was the reason why I decided to distance myself from the volunteer work of promoting and supporting your products.
So, please demonstrate to your fans here that you do appreciate them and put the MP issue to rest. Also, make a serious effort to improve your communication policies and how information is delivered to your consumers.
Thank you!
Last edited by Jason Beaudoin on 12-10-2001 at 06:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pembleton
|
|
Cyberspace
Apr 1999 time: 23:15
|
|
Well my message to Firaxis is: Well Done!
I'm glad you got out the SP because that means you concentrated on completing that part and decided not to rush MP. I don't feel like I should be penalized with a delay in the game for an aspect of the game that I don't care about. And no MP means that the SP will be of higher quality. A release with both would mean an inferior SP as well as an inferior MP!
Go Firaxis! (Well a friend does want to play MP with me, but if he didn't ask, I wouldn't have even thought about it.)
Last edited by Pembleton on 11-10-2001 at 23:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jason Beaudoin
|
|
Canada
Jan 1970 time: 00:15
|
|
Personally, I couldn't care less about MP. In fact, I probably will never play MP.
The point of my message is that their delivery of the news is deplorable. We deserve better than that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shiva
|
 |
Omaha,Nebraska USA
Jan 1970 time: 23:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Steve Clark
Delivery of what news? Just because they didn't explicitly say that MP would not be in the Oct 2001 release does not ASS-U-ME that it would be in the release. No one can find an official announcement saying that they were committed to having MP in the Oct 2001, so the message is moot, imo.
One can argue that they should have been more "honest" about its status but all of you should have learned by now that Firaxis' modus operandi is to only announce things when they are ready. All the rest is pure speculation and that it the trap that many of you have fallen into. |
Steve what I get out of his post is that first off there isnt anything one way or the other and its causing a hell of alot of trouble when a one word answer would let us all know and let it get worked outta the system. If they would have said its not in a month ago this wouldnt be happening now (you would still have the doomsayers) at this level. With out an answer it goes on day in day out here and it will keep going till we know.
Also since the game went gold we have not had hardly anything new come out. Their site hasnt even been updated. Now is the time for the information to be flowing. And it needs to start with a clear answer on MP.
Last edited by Shiva on 12-10-2001 at 00:36
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jason Beaudoin
|
|
Canada
Jan 1970 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: One can argue that they should have been more "honest" about its status but all of you should have learned by now that Firaxis' modus operandi is to only announce things when they are ready. All the rest is pure speculation and that it the trap that many of you have fallen into. |
You almost had me on this one... but the problem remains that the delivery of the news was really poorly done.
I know that Firaxis must play a very delicate balancing act on releasing enough information so that the game flies of the shelves, but enough information to themselves so that expectations are not set too high, which could result in bad reviews.
I appreciate their position and I understand it fully...
...but, I can't think of any reason why they would keep information about MP out of it, other than they either couldn't get it done in time for an October release. If that is the case, they should have simply told us so and moved on.
Regardless, there are much better ways to handle bad news like this, and we deserve better.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rakki
|
 |
Sydney, Australia
Sep 2001 time: 15:15
|
|
Why don't the MP crowd just shut up and go play CtP or something ? In this day and age, I'm sure Firaxis had to make some choices and didn't just take MP out to spite everyone. Well, not everyone, because I personally don't care.
If you think not having MP will ruin Civ3, that's your problem, but there's people out there who think a decent (or even, GREAT SP) is much more important than a half-assed MP squeezed in 2 months before release.
I've always judged a game by what it delivers, rather than what it *promises* to deliver. If it's fun, it's fun. If it's not fun, then it's not fun, and I'll just have to look elsewhere.
No point getting over-fixatred on one thing. It's not like we only have Civ 3 to play for the next 6 months or 3 years until Civ 4 (or another Civ clone) comes out.
Law of Nature: "Species that are over-specialized become extinct when the climate or environment changes."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Steve Clark
Delivery of what news? Just because they didn't explicitly say that MP would not be in the Oct 2001 release does not ASS-U-ME that it would be in the release. No one can find an official announcement saying that they were committed to having MP in the Oct 2001, so the message is moot, imo. |
MULTIPLAYER IS THE FUTURE! SID SAID IT HIMSELF ABOUT GETTYSBURG! I AM SORRY THAT YOU THINK IT IS NAIVEE TO BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY MAKING THE GAME.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rakki
Why don't the MP crowd just shut up and go play CtP or something ? In this day and age, I'm sure Firaxis had to make some choices and didn't just take MP out to spite everyone. Well, not everyone, because I personally don't care. |
I will be going to play SMAC. To me Civ 3 is a downgraded game from their previous releases if it does not have MP.
They clearly did not plan well to develop MP. It should not have been very hard to add PBEM or hotseat. It was there mistake that I am now paying for.
quote: Law of Nature: "Species that are over-specialized become extinct when the climate or environment changes." |
And species also go extinct when they fail to adapt to the changing environment. Case in point, MP becoming more and more important. Especially for the staying power of Civ 3.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pembleton
|
|
Cyberspace
Apr 1999 time: 23:15
|
|
well duh its $
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Green Giant
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Their silence on the multiplayer issue is telling. |
Or they could just be tired of defending every decision they make from a small but overly vocal group of whiners. They don't answer to you, me, or anyone else on the BB. When they do, they do so out of courtesy.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|