 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Rasbelin
|
 |
Tampere (Tammerfors), Finland
Nov 1999
time: 07:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Falconius
First, the USA IS the best country in the world! That's why most of the world's immigrants come here.
|
"To bite of more than one can chew."
"Joka kuuseen kurkottaa, se katajaan kapsahtaa."
If I would say that USA is the "best" country to live
in, I would be braindead. Yeap!
How can you be sure that immigrants come to USA,
because it would be "so nice to stay there"?
I have to say right up on your face that many of
the immigrants in USA are illegal (guess why -
bad immigration policies and attitude - "Stay out, Cuban
commies!") and many of those poor ones who immigrate
to US have only heard about the Big Apple and America.
They come to US were they "should be able to make a fortune".
Bulls_hit! Many of them end up in ditches and alleys,
begging for a cent or two, selling themselves as prostitutes,
working as lowpaid employees at McDonald's, etc.
Nice way to live! "The American dream". Bulls_hit!
And is the American society looking after these human beings?
Nope! And don't try to be hippocratic! 
quote:
Second, the world DOES need America!
|
True, but who caused it? We - Europeans? No.
quote:
We tried to stay out of World War One, but had to come and save Europe from destroying itself. Then we tried to stay out of World War Two, but once again were forced out of our isolation to come save everyone from the warmongering Germans and Japanese. Then the British and French BEGGED us to keep troops in Europe and send some to the mid-east to counter the Soviet threat.
Then we had to prop up the dying European economies with the Marshall plan.
|
Have you finished your propaganda speech?
If yes, I continue. Tried to stay away from war?
Helped beggars? How cute!
Bulls_hit! You just saw Hitler and WWII as a threat for your own
heartland and financial interests. Saving the rest of the world?
Holy Moses, you have been brainwashed! Russian threat?
Just sold warplanes (Aircobras, Kingcobras, Thunderbolts) to USSR,
so that they could attack little Finland. You SOB! You FAL! ...
Have you ever read about WWII from a non-American aspect?
Apparently not.
quote:
And we are merely replacing the British in their role of the "Balancer" in world affairs. With so many fires constantly igniting in the world that threaten to become greater conflagrations, the world needs someone to come along and put out the fire.
|
Arrrggghhhh!  Now you're trying to insult UK!
So you think that USA "balanced" the world by having
war in Vietnam? Or how about Afghanistan 1979?
Not to mention the Gulf and the promise of a free Palestinian
state?
quote:
It would be nice to see some international body, like the UN, be given the authority to be the world's policeman, but so far that hasn't panned out. So the top dog is forced into the role.
|
And thanks to whom has this situation been created?
Suprise, suprise; USA!
quote:
Be thankful it was the Soviets that collapsed and not the US. Can you imagine the Soviets as world policeman? At least the US attempts not to harm civilians (depite the fact that we recently lost 6000 of them). A Soviet war machine might not be so polite. |
"What a view, what a vision!"
Once again hippocratic? Apparently you are.
And the final conclusion...
To don't take this too personally, but is it really necessary
to promote US like that? I mean, haven't we seen enough yet?
P.S. Added a "you" when editing, nothing else has been changed.
Last edited by Rasbelin on 15-10-2001 at 21:11
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ozymandous
|
 |
Atlanta, GA
Aug 2001
time: 00:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by tuckson
Nah... Depends on the motive. Revenge is not a valid motive. Extinction of terroristic threat is. |
Agreed.
quote:
The problem usually is that the US often underestimates anything outside their borders. Besides that, Most Americans are pretty sure The US of A are the best country in the World. Of course other countries have sort a like ideas, only they usually don't try to be the world's police officer. America seems to think the World NEEDS America. Well... it can be used, but the world can survive without the USA I guess. |
1. Everyone thinks their country is the best, unless they live in some third world country and are terrorized or abused and then they might not like it as much (or like their leaders anyway).
2. America is the world's police officer because WE'RE ASKED, or NO ONE ELSE WILL HELP STOP CRAP. Look at Bosnia, I don't remember any of the European powers stepping in and trying to stop genocide. I guess America should jus give hundreds of millions in cash and other aid as we do now without lending any kind of military aid as well??
Yeah right, what world do you live in?
Sure, the world would still exist without the USA, but tell me, where would all of the aid to all these countries of the world come from if not for the U.S? Europe? Asia? Africa? lol, yeah right.
quote:
It's not we (non-americans) don't like the USA. Not at all, usually they have our sympathy. But if we look at the circus you make of the democratic principle of election, how can you expect to be taken seriously? |
And if Americans look at the circus of the Qubec people trying to declare independance from Canada, the scandal's of the British royal families, the French and German business dealings with known dictators and terrorists like Sudam Hussein, China's beat down on humanitarism, etc, how can the people in the US take anyone else seriously??
Face it, almost any country worth a damn in the world has their "differences" and thingsa that make them good and bad. It's easy to stand in the peanut gallery or on the side-lines and say "if we were ahead of the world we could do this", but hell it's better to be out front making mistakes (or not) and learning than sitting in the ass end of things and complaining about the driving.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
BigBear
|
|
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Sep 2001
time: 05:15
|
|
I know I am really late, but as an American I would like excersise my god given right to annoy foreigners with my ignorant and arrogant opinions:
LordGrey, that map was helarious.
Americans are the most powerful to ever exist. Not because of a powerful military or a huge economy, but because we have television and technology that allows us to extend are opinions and culture world wide.
We do have alot of incredibly stupid people over here, but every nation has their idiots. Our's just sometimes sneak into the presidency.
Not every American could be stupid and fat, otherwise, you would not be getting the greatest game of all time in 15 days.
If you guys dislike Americans so much, hit them where it counts, don't but American products, i.e. Civ 3.
"Dumm" is not the correct spelling. 
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
jglidewell
|
|
manassas va usa
Feb 2001
time: 00:15
|
|
Hey, this is cool, this like a psychologists game of name the first thing that comes to mind. Okay lets go, give me your responses.
I am an American.
I am Catholic.
I am from Finland.
I am from Britain. (Is this different from I am British.)
I am English.
I am a lumberjack.
I am from Canada.
I am Muslem.
I am a terrorist.
I am a European.
And an aside, America is the most powerful because of it's economy, not it's military. France surely has it right and knows what cultural creep is.
America - All the refuse from the rest of the world. No wonder the world thinks America stinks. It has a cousin too, namely Australia.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sabre2th
|
|
quote:
Hey? One question. If Americans are so proud of their country why is it that they wear Canadian pins and shirts when they vacation abroad????? |
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're saying here, but I'll try to answer anyway. Many Americans, when visiting Canada, wear pins and shirts out of respect for the country. They like to be able to say they've been there. This holds true for every other vacation spot.
quote:
When someone posts crap like this it's so hard to like Americans! |
Once again, it is a (very) small group of Americans that are ruining things. The majority of 'normal' Americans are probably going to avoid this argument. This goes back to my post about generalization. Don't dislike Americans just because of this shmuck.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ozymandous
|
|
Atlanta, GA
Aug 2001
time: 00:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Rasbelin
"To bite of more than one can chew."
"Joka kuuseen kurkottaa, se katajaan kapsahtaa."
If I would say that USA is the "best" country to live
in, I would be braindead. Yeap! |
Not unless you're from the US then you'd feel that way more than likely, same can be said of British feeling England is the best, etc.
quote:
How can you be sure that immigrants come to USA,
because it would be "so nice to stay there"?
I have to say right up on your face that many of
the immigrants in USA are illegal (guess why -
bad immigration policies and attitude - "Stay out, Cuban
commies!") and many of those poor ones who immigrate
to US have only heard about the Big Apple and America.
They come to US were they "should be able to make a fortune".
Bulls_hit! Many of them end up in ditches and alleys,
begging for a cent or two, selling themselves as prostitutes,
working as lowpaid employees at McDonald's, etc.
Nice way to live! "The American dream". Bulls_hit!
And is the American society looking after these human beings?
Nope! And don't try to be hippocratic! |
Funny, for someone claiming to know so much about America (and the rest of the world?) you're clearly showing your ignorance.
1. Immigrants came to America because for many of them it was a new chance to make something of their life. The US was less structured and unfettered so people who, in some European countries like for example, Finland, might not have a great chance to be "free" and do what they want could do so here.
2. Many people came to US for Religious "freedom", and to have less biases' against them than they might have in their original country of origin.
3. A BIG CLUE for you, people have always come to the US, legal or not, this is not something "new" since Fidel took over Cuba and not necessarily in the last twenty years from Mexico or other Latin and/or SOuth American countries. To claim that all of them are living in the alley as bums or lying on their back as prostitutes is a completely IGNORANT statement and shows how little you know about the US other than the information you have been spoon-fed instead of discovering information yourself.
4. Immigrants, illegal or otherwise do many of the "menial" and not so menial jobs than others can't or won't. I know several people in the construction business who love immigrants because they work damn hard and get paid well for what they do. Sure $7-$10 an hour might not sound like much for such hard work but for a lot of these people this is much more pay for the same amount of work they'd do in their home countries anyway. Many of these folks also send money back to others outside the US and pay the way for more people to better themselves.
5. Sorry, the US is not a socialist country, it is not (IMHO) society's place to support people who aren't willing to work to make a living. If you've ever been to the US you'll see all sorts of Gas stations, Fast food resturants & hotels owned and making a profit for immigrants. This is not stereotypical, just fact, and the amusing thing is a lot of Americans "look down" upon these businesses without knowing how truly profitable they can be (heh, some of us are dumb!). 
quote:
Have you finished your propaganda speech?
If yes, I continue. Tried to stay away from war?
Helped beggars? How cute! |
I could ask you the same thing, are you done with your little rant against the US yet? It is getting quite tiresome (but still amusing). 
quote:
Bulls_hit! You just saw Hitler and WWII as a threat for your own
heartland and financial interests. Saving the rest of the world?
Holy Moses, you have been brainwashed! Russian threat?
Just sold warplanes (Aircobras, Kingcobras, Thunderbolts) to USSR,
so that they could attack little Finland. You SOB! You FAL! ...
Have you ever read about WWII from a non-American aspect?
Apparently not. |
I have. THings aren't as cut and dry as you'd like them to appear as well. Umm, are you crazy or just stupid? Hitler WAS a threat to EVERYONE'S homeland, which was proven when he conquered HOW many countries??
I can see the true cause of your obvious anti-American bias when you complain and ***** about how the USSR used the equipment we sent them to fight the Germans. Ah, clue for you, but we can't tell them how to use them, you'd be better off complaining to the Russians about their behavior in that war than *****ing at the US for apparently "not policing" what other countries did with the equipment they bought and paid for.
To use a modern example, do you see anyone outraged at the French and German businesses who built the factories and supplied the parts for the chemical weapons plants? No! These businesses simply supplied the parts and knowledge, it's not up to them to tell their customers how to use their products.
Why don't you take your own advice and read some history not slanted by the Finnish view, you might be surprised that you're as "brain-washed" with nationalism as all the other countries citizens who don't take the time to look at the real facts.
quote:
Arrrggghhhh! Now you're trying to insult UK! |
How is stating the fact that the British Empire was simply looking out for itself first insulting the UK? It's not.
The British Empire did what all empires did, make themselves richer. Doesn't matter how, when or where, all Empires are out for themselves first and fore-most, everything else second.
quote:
So you think that USA "balanced" the world by having
war in Vietnam? Or how about Afghanistan 1979?
Not to mention the Gulf and the promise of a free Palestinian
state? |
Hmm, to use the earlier Brisith Empire example, did Britian "balance" the world by essentially taking control of India, South, Hong Kong and parts of a lot of other countries (a tad rusty, heh)? Heck no, they did what they felt they had to do to SPREAD their influence and secure or increase their stature in the world. This is NO different than Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan or the GUlf War (which was for oil, yes, but also to support the Arab nations the US can at least talk to).
quote:
And the final conclusion...
To don't take this too personally, but is it really necessary
to promote US like that? I mean, haven't we seen enough yet? |
In response, and don't take this personally, but haven't we seen enough mud-slinging from other, smaller, countries yet? Is it really neccessary to try to place the blame for the entire world's troubles at the feet of one country? Convient, but hardly honest or true.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Akaoz
|
 |
Europe
May 2001
time: 05:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Falconius
First, the USA IS the best country in the world! That's why most of the world's immigrants come here.
Second, the world DOES need America! We tried to stay out of World War One, but had to come and save Europe from destroying itself. Then we tried to stay out of World War Two, but once again were forced out of our isolation to come save everyone from the warmongering Germans and Japanese. Then the British and French BEGGED us to keep troops in Europe and send some to the mid-east to counter the Soviet threat. Then we had to prop up the dying European economies with the Marshall plan.
Third, the US is now the world's police officer because the world NEEDS a police officer! After the experience of repeatedly going from war to isolationism, we were finally forced to stay out by the length of the Cold War. And we are merely replacing the British in their role of the "Balancer" in world affairs. With so many fires constantly igniting in the world that threaten to become greater conflagrations, the world needs someone to come along and put out the fire.
It would be nice to see some international body, like the UN, be given the authority to be the world's policeman, but so far that hasn't panned out. So the top dog is forced into the role. Who else is gonna do it? The Netherlands!?
Be thankful it was the Soviets that collapsed and not the US. Can you imagine the Soviets as world policeman? At least the US attempts not to harm civilians (depite the fact that we recently lost 6000 of them). A Soviet war machine might not be so polite. |
ROFLMAO!
One word: Troll!
-Alech
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sabre2th
|
|
quote:
I think in this case, The US are prisoner of their own foreign politics from the post WW2 decades. Indeed it's not possible for them right now to retreat and let it all go. They're too deep into it. |
This is true, but again, there were good reasons for each of those instances.
quote:
And I do think it's a good thing one helps someone else when it can be done. However it's a bit silly to think the us do things for the sake of the world. |
Why is that? Just because you're selfish and ignorant doesn't mean everyone is. There were selfish reasons for them, but we weren't involved just because it helped us.
quote:
All the world knows that the primary concerns of the US foreign politics are the US own needs. |
I'm glad you 'know' this. Tell me: Are you an important part of the U.S. government? Do you lead us in some way?
quote:
Examples? The US only got into WW2 AFTER Pearl Harbor. |
You can think what you want, but there were many other reasons for that. The Peal Harbor attack was just the straw that broke the camel's back.
quote:
The Gulf War only was there because of the US oil needs. |
That was the main reason, but again, there were others.
quote:
But as soon as interests of US and "the world" become different, The US choose NOT to stay close to the world, but go their own way. Today's example of this? The Rocket shield project. |
For once, I agree with you, but do you think the shield is the fault of America as a whole? It was a stupid decision by a not-necessarily-so-smart government.
quote:
You bet. Of course we also have some sort of circus. However, Our elections and party programs usually are aimed on capabilities and plans, and not on the person of a political leader him (or her)self. It's a typical American thing to, as soon as a president is installed, dig up his entire personal life and history to find even the tiniest mistake in order to break his career. Things like the Monica Lewinsky story would not happen here because it's a leader's private life. The important thing is how he/she is running the country. That's the reason someone is (re)elected. Not because he could find the most dirty facts about his opponents or because he came up with the longest nicknames for them. |
I'm sorry to say that there is more to the election. The media will bring out certain aspects of a candidate's life, but that does not decide the election. This information also says something about a candidate's character and potential leadership ability.
You also mention the Monica Lewinsky case. Maybe it wouldn't have happened in your country and maybe it was his private life, but it did not affect most people's opinion of his leadership abilities. Many, including me, see Clinton as one of the better presidents in our history.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15.
Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-10-2001 18:43
Unfortunately the world is such a big place even well educated people can be stunningly ignorant about some facets of it. I thought I knew a fair bit about Europe until I played EU. I knew I had little idea how the Canadian and US regions fitted together, let alone Central and South America and I was right 
|
|