 |
|  |
 |
|
Tolkien
|
|
Anywhere but here
Oct 2001 time: 22:15
|
|
Akron,
thats not correct, most people DO NOT have a computer/monitor with a 1024x768 or better. my monitor runs at 800x600, but it can be playable at that resolution. however, most people do not. if you read alot of the posts, most people here don't have access to a computer with that type of resolution.
and also, Master Marcus, civ3 really isn't that ahead of the gaming community. the requirements are at a quite reasonable level. 300 mhz (or is it 400?) is not high, nor is 32 MB RAM, and the 400 mb req space is nothin. Diablo II required a minimum of 600, but the standard req. was 900 - 1500 MB. the only thing I have to complain about is the resolution, compared to the other requirements, it is a bit too high I think for those that can't run at that level.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lung
|
 |
of my princess Anastasia!
Mar 1999 time: 15:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tolkien
my monitor runs at 800x600, but it can be playable at that resolution |
Do you mean that Civ3 can play at 600x800, or do you mean that your monitor can play at 1024x768? Anyway, i realised that my monitor indicated that it can play at 1024x768, but only with 256 colours, but would that display Civ3 at all?
The point is, is that less and less games are coming out on PC, so the cost of a major computer upgrade cannot be justified by a solitary game. That means that Civ3 could cost $1000 if Civ3 was the only reason for your computer upgrade. Simply put, i could spend $500 on a PS2, which will give me a DVD player, a greater range of games, and the ability to hire games to try-before-you-buy. Only Civ3 can make this into any sort of debate 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Akron
|
|
Maybe your right about the resolution, but I believe that all new monitors for the past few years, aside from the dirt cheap ones, have supported 1024x768. Hell, it's now the standard for laptops (unless you're going to the REALLY cheap end, or one of those super light/ small things). But since I'm curious, I'll start a poll on this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dainbramaged13
|
|
Dumbass
Mar 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
no no guys, i got a dirt cheap monitor a year and a half ago and it displyas up to 1600*1200, ok? if u dont have 1024, then u need an upgrade. the results of the poll will be interesting.. The only reason that "most" of the posts u have seen have only 800*600 is because the only people that post are the ones that have something to complain about. anyway, even in this thread, more people do have it.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|