 |
|  |
 |
|
CygnusZ
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dodgedemon
I agree with UberKrux, every nation has to figure out for itself what works best at the time.
The U.S. response to the Native American "problem" wasn't real nice, but it sure as hell was effective. Ask any conquered people wether violence solves anything, see what they have to say.
I'm not condoning what we did, making and breaking treaties wasn't honorable. I just don't think we had any other options. |
There are always other options... like actually stopping settler's from going wherever the hell they feel like.
However, you do bring up a good point. History can be depicted by illustrating that all conflict are too villanous or heroic forces clashing together. The way people have a **** fit whenever I depict something that goes against their morals is an inbred response to years of brainwashing.
"Right" and "Wrong" in any conflict are null concepts. Conflict is exactly that, conflict. The clash of two different points of view. It is the best way, but yet the most dangerous, not to see anything as being "evil" in and of itself. Osama is not evil, he is a human being who has real motivations and reasons for conducting a campaign of terror (well, he alone is not really conducting it... that's an American blame/press thing).
But here's the problem, I'm sure that some people are now going to get on my case because I feel the view that Osama bin Ladin is "evil" is nill. If I talk anywhere and suggest that Bin Ladin is not simply "evil" and does things because he is "evil" I'm going to be in trouble.
So, anybody who attempts to really understand conflict is "evil", because they are not on the side of "good".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
UKScud
|
|
Auckland, NZ
Sep 2001 time: 05:15
|
|
quote: what you dont understand is that every nation does what is right for itself. it does what IT THINKS IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. this is based on a region's background, geography, morals, and anything else that makes up the nation. |
...and how many people do you think will be winning Civ3 by being voted leader of the UN.
It'll take a very different kind of game to avoid ticking off any other Civs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
facistdictator
|
|
I believe completely in doing what needs to be done to win no matter the cost im sorry but thats life and thats war. I think the idea of death camps should be in the game. To me a strategy game needs to be as life itself, violence, death, rape, pillaging, and genocide are the darker recesses of man's war but still very real. To me war is the greatest assurance for eternal peace. If the enemy does not fear you you will fall, but if you appease your own people and slaughter those who stand before you in my book your more of a man than anyone. Thats what has always seperated real leaders and just puppets. The few against the many, the struggle, perseverance, and the belief in what your doing is right, and willing to die for.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CygnusZ
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Admiral PJ
I don't want civ3 to become a sick game like some of you are talking about, just to create a realistic good versus evil storyline (with some nations inbetween) and ways to reflect the various government policies and cultural diversity of our history.
NOTE: China does have slave work camps, for political etc prisoners as far as I'm aware.. have no illusions about the evils in chinese government, they are like Soviet Russias communism was but even less stable /morale.
We can only try and bring about a democratic solution in china or there will probably be fatalities.
|
Hmm... first thing is first. There's no such thing as "Good" and there's no such thing as "Evil".
Second of all, it is against the law in China to hold a political protest. And you know the international law, if you break the law in a foriegn country you are subject to its punishment. The normal prison system in China involves labor, and it does take a stretch of the imagine to equate this to "slave labor camps".
Lighten up,the America's dominance shall end one day, the light of plenty shall shine upon another nation. It's improper to judge other culture's by this standard. Look, I'm American but this attitude sucks. There's nothing "special" about this hunk of land.
PS-China is less stable? Less Morale? Maybe you want to back that up?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CygnusZ
|
|
quote: Originally posted by UberKruX
forced labor only works in despotisms or communisms. so you have ot be the "bad guy" governments to do it anyway.
(don't get me started on why communism isn't bad... civ3 ships tomorrow, no time to argue) |
No forced labor under Monarchy?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dodgedemon
|
|
Logan, UT USA
Oct 2001 time: 22:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Andrew1999
Despotism and communism sacrificie people to rush construction; monarchy, republic and democracy pay gold. Republic and democracy can draft 1 citizen per city, despotism and monarchy can draft 2, and communism can draft 3. |
Looks like Monarchy pays gold to rush.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|