|
Jack_www
|
|
I think that this stuff with yin is getting out of hand. Everyone in here seems to be trying to start a fight with yin or is fighting with him because they think that he is being to negitive. (When I read his post they do seems a bit too negitive, so I guess people have a point here.) But he does bring out many good points.
First of all a lot of people do care about mp in Civ3. I am one of those people. All though I am going to get the game soon even though it does not have mp in it, I am sure many who want mp in Civ3 will still buy it anyway. But I think releasing the game with out mp is a serious misstake. What if the A.I. in Civ3 turns out to be really bad, what will you do then? Even if the A.I. in Civ 3 is ok, as with any game after a certain amount of time you figure out how to beat the A.I. and then grow tried of the game(this happens to me and I am sure it happens with a lot of people)
Second, since there is no mp in Civ3 i think it would be important for a reiview of the game to include what they think about the A.I.
also will all you people please stop fighting with yin and get back on topic. Last time I checked with thread was suppose to be based on the review of Civ3, not how negitave yin is about Civ3 and how he wants no one to buy Civ3
|
31-10-2001 11:21
.
|
|