 |
|  |
 |
|
Zealot
|
 |
Lisboa, Portugal
Jun 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
Ok, I'll have to start with little info. I don't have very much time right now, so any help is always welcome.
I propose our leader to be: King John II
Special unit: Don't know that yet. This could be where I would appreciate help pretty much! But it could be a Caravel, if it could give a really big bonus in commerce or trade. I don't know, I haven't played CivIII much.
Attributes: Definetly Commercial and Expansionist! Unlike some other civs that I'm seeing that have these same atributes (and which I don't agree with), the portuguese have earned these attributes, since they colonized a lot of Africa (east and west coast) and Brazil, and established trade posts in Macau, Timor and Japan.
Great Leaders: Infant Henrique, Vasco da Gama, Pedro Álvares Cabral, Marquis of Pombal, Nuno Álvares Pereira, Afonso de Albuquerque (...)
Golden Age: late XV to mid XVIII centuries
Cities:
Capital: Lisboa (or Lisbon, whatever) edit: or Guimarães (first portuguese capital; Lisboa was 2nd)
Porto
Coimbra
Faro
Braga
Bragança
Santarém
Évora
Beja
Alcobaça
Viseu
Guarda
Castelo Branco
Sines
Sagres
Leiria
Viana do Castelo
Vila Real
Aveiro
Portalegre
Setúbal
Funchal
Ponta Delgada
Angra do Heroísmo
Covilhã
Sintra
Avis
Crato
Vila Viscosa
Figueira da Foz
Chaves
Portimão
Macau
Goa
Diu
Díli
São Paulo
Natal
Recife
Lourenço Marques
Luanda
Cidade da Praia
Mombaça
Don't forget! Every help is appreciated!
Last edited by Zealot on 19-11-2001 at 23:48
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JayKay
|
 |
Lisboa, Portugal
Oct 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jay Bee
At it's peak, Spain included Portugal. Without Portugal, the Spanish empire would have not been the first one in which the sun never set (sentence ripped off by the British a few centuries later). Nevertheless I agree that the term Spanish does not mean today what it used to in the Middle Ages/Renaissance. Thus a civilization containing both the Spanish and the Portuguese would have to be called Iberian. I actually have been supporting that idea for long |
I agree with the ideia of "Iberian civilization" in a matter of pure simplification, but never the Portuguese can be included in Spain (nor vice-versa), because Portugal wasn't a part of Spain for that long, so i don't think it would be historicaly accurante to include Portugal in Spain, even because the cultures of the two nations are very different!
If you recall, Portugal was part of Spain because the Portuguese King D. Sebastião died in Ceuta fighting the "infidels", leaving no descendacy! Because of that, Portugal went to Spain dominance, but not for our choice, but by force, because the next line in the Portuguese throne was the King of Spain! 
Also, if you recall, a few years later under the Spanish dominance, the Portuguese people revolted against it, putting in the throne the King D. João I, starting a new dynasty called "dynasty of Avis" and ending the Spanish dominance in Portuguese territory! 
So....as you see, the Spanish dominance was short and unwelcome! So including Portugal in Spain is the same thing that including France in England - meaning pure nonsense! 
BTW, Zealot, you should include Guimarães in your portuguese city list, since it was the first Capital of Portugal during lots of years, until the conquest of Lisboa from the "infidels"! 
_________________________________________________

Portugal
Nation of: Magellan's (from Magellan's Expedition);
Vasco da Gama (Discoverer of the Maritime path to India);
and Pedro Álvares Cabral (Discoverer of Brazil in 1500)
Last edited by JayKay on 13-11-2001 at 19:34
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JayKay
|
 |
Lisboa, Portugal
Oct 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zealot
JayKay... huh... king John I was from the Avis family, but he was the 1st king of the second dynasty. Since the spanish occupation was from 1600 to 1640, under the Philips, and were the third dynasty, John I couldn't possibly succeed the spanish.
It was indeed a John. But it was John IV, Duque of Bragança.  |
Well...i might be mistaken in that part! sorry! 
quote: Guimarães added. But Lisboa should be the capital. |
Yes...of course Lisboa should be the capital! I didn't say Guimarães should be the Capital, i just said that Guimarães should be added, because it had an important place in the history of our country! I'm glad you agree with me! 
quote: BTW, what should be the portuguese unique unit? |
Well....i think it should be the "Nau"! A kind of Caravel, but faster! What do you think?
BTW, about the leader - why King John II? Why not King Afonso Henriques? (Just curious) 
_________________________________________________

Portugal
Nation of: Magellan's (from Magellan's Expedition);
Vasco da Gama (Discoverer of the Maritime path to India);
and Pedro Álvares Cabral (Discoverer of Brazil in 1500)
Last edited by JayKay on 13-11-2001 at 20:21
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
PGM
|
 |
Lisboa, Portugal
Aug 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jay Bee
At it's peak, Spain included Portugal |
IMHO, this line of thought is wrong. If we start taking civilizations away from civ3 because somewhere in time they belonged to another nation, we'll have to play the game with very few civs. Sure, Portugal was during a small period of time under Spanish domain. Does that overrule the fact that Portugal was once one of the two most prosperous nations on the planet? Does that overwrite the fact that Portugal was once ruler of Brazil, many parts of India, a great deal of south-western Africa, Macao, Timor, etc., and that in most cases this lasted for centuries? Does it make it less important that Portuguese Discoveries showed the world new naval routes, new people, new cultures,... ? I don't think so. Just think of the Romans...
quote: Originally posted by Jay Bee
No matter how you look at it, Spain and Portugal are definitely very close culture-wise. Many things differentiate them, but many others link them together as well. That in the eyes of non-Iberians these similarities are more evident than the differences should be quite revealing. After all, Portugal and Spain share 2300 years of common history, you can't get pass that . We are definitely part of the same civilization. Imho that's our strength. That's what I was trying to highlight in my previous posting above. |
Again, we're taking civs away from civ3. Now it's because they are close culturally? There's a lot of nations already in the game who share cultural similarities. What kind of problem can this be, when we have Americans in civ3 starting in 4000BC ? Isn't this a little more flagrant problem?
Again, all of Europe was under Roman domain. But still, we somehow have 4 European civilizations in civ3, plus the Romans. And looks like as if more will come. Humm... Sounds like if the nations' own merit play key role here.
I think that if people don't know about Portuguese culture, that's ok. If it's not good for geographical gameplay to have a Portuguese civ, I can understand. If people can't tell Portugal apart from Spain in a map, fine. If people don't think that it's "cool" to have a civ named Portuguese, ok. But those are personal preferences, and I think that in no way they should harm the merits of the Portuguese civilization as one of the greatest ever to exist, nor should it hamper Portugal's right to be amongst the nations in one of the future civ3 expansions.
And you might not believe it, but I'm not just saying this because I happen to be Portuguese... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jay Bee
|
 |
Valladolid, CA
Jan 1970 time: 06:16
|
|
Well, actually I have to rectify, it's 2200 years, not 2300 
It is accepted that Iberian history commences when the Phoenicians and Greeks visited the peninsula in search for silver, tin and other metals. The Phoenicians founded Gades (Cadiz) ca, 1000 BC and it is believed that not much after the foundation of Cadiz, they established other coastal settlements, including Olisipo (Lisbon) and Malaga. Alternatively, Olisipo might have been founded by the Tartessians, an indigenous civilization that streteched from the W (Algarve) to the E (Almeria and Murcia) of the peninsula. In what is today Northern Portugal there were the Celts, occupying as well what is today Castile, Galicia and Asturias.
After the Phoenicians/Carthaginians, Greeks, Tartessians/Iberians and Celts there were the Romans. After the Romans there were the Visigoths and then the Arabs. Let's stop in 1139 AD.
Up to this point, 2000 years of history have passed in which the territories that Portugal occupies today have been subjected to the same fate as their neighbouring Spanish territories. In 1139 AD Portugal secedes from the young kingdom of Castile to form an independent country. Portuguese independence lasts up to 1580 and is regained again in 1640 to this date. Thus Portugal has existed as an independent entity, separated from the rest of the nations of Iberia for 802 years. Since we are in 2001, that makes 2200 years where the destiny of Portugal was tied to the destiny of the rest of Iberia 
Spain as we know it today is younger than Portugal, as it was created in 1479.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JayKay
|
 |
Lisboa, Portugal
Oct 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jay Bee
Spain as we know it today is younger than Portugal, as it was created in 1479. |
Indeed, Portuguese borders are the oldest ones in Europe, and one of the oldest of the World! 
Anyway, i see what you mean JayBee, and i agree with you - we (Portugal and Spain) do have many centurys of history, interaction and competition together, but i don't think those first centurys (those civilizations weren't really Portuguese and Spanish yet) had the same importance as the golden age of Portugal and Spain, as separate nations, in the Discovery Age! 
I mean, all the civilizations of the world had a common begining in some part of the history! 
So...what i really mean is that we should take into account, what parts of the world history was marked by what civilizations, and only those which had some kind of influence in world history should be included!! 
That's why the Americans are included (perhaps not the biggest reason of course - i mean the game is made by americans)! They aren't a really "civilization", they are really a mix of other civilizations (english, french, spanish, africans), but that's what makes them so unique, and that's why they are included in Civilization (and because they marked the 19th and 20th century history)!! 
So...in conclusion, what i mean is that Portugal and Spain had a very big impact in world history! They alone dicovered lots of other countrys - the others nations just followed our (Spanish and Portuguese) steps! But all the impact in world history that our two countrys had, was made as two independent and competitive nations! 
So...that's why i think we shouldn't join the two nations! Aldo i understand the unification of the Iberian Peninsula (for matters of simplification and common history), i can't agree with it! 
But i agree with pretty much everything else you said, Jay Bee! 
BTW, i have a suggestion! Why don't we make the Portuguese and the Spanish Civilization apart and also an Iberian Civilization! That way we could have them all! 
Got to love that word! ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL! lol
_________________________________________________

Portugal
Nation of: Magellan's (from Magellan's Expedition);
Vasco da Gama (Discoverer of the Maritime path to India);
and Pedro Álvares Cabral (Discoverer of Brazil in 1500)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|