 |
| |
|
|
Roman
|
 |
Bratislava, Slovakia
Sep 2000
time: 05:16
|
|
Again an article from my favourite BBC designed to spark a debate.
quote:
Thursday, 22 November, 2001, 15:16 GMT
EU warns on 'wealth gap'
Europe has been slow to adopt new technology
Unless Europe quickly learns to innovate and adopt new technologies, its standard of living will fall ever further behind the US, the European Commission has warned.
Erkki Liikanen, European Commissioner for Enterprise, said that average wealth per head in the EU was just two-thirds of that in the US.
This gap is the widest since the 1960s.
According to a report from Mr Liikanen's department, European industry has insufficiently invested in new technologies, despite the fact that they have become vastly cheaper in recent years.
The resulting failure to innovate has dented average productivity per European worker, while US firms have become more efficient.
Corporate investment in information technology is equivalent to 2.4% of Europe's economic output, compared with a US figure of 4.5%, Mr Liikanen said.
Image problem
Mr Liikanen's competitiveness report follows a period of soul-searching in Brussels, where officials are troubled about Europe's somewhat old-fashioned image.
Erkki Liikanen: Worried about wealth gap
The economic slowdown, accompanied by heavy lay-offs among some of Europe's most venerable companies, has exacerbated the situation, the commission feels.
Until recently, the layer of large and medium-sized manufacturing firms, especially highly concentrated in Germany, were viewed as the motor of Europe's economy.
But some economists now worry that these firms are incapable of delivering enough efficiency gains to power a world-beating surge in the standard of living.
Labour problems
In the meantime, widespread poverty and unemployment in Europe, especially at its fringes, mar its otherwise prosperous air.
Despite EU plans to fight joblessness, the continent is still way off the target of an overall employment level of 70%.
In the US, a far higher proportion of the population is in the labour force.
And because of their generally higher level of relevant skills, US workers are roughly one-third more productive than the EU average.
Getting riskier
A connected piece of research from Mr Liikanen's department gave some encouragement.
According to the so-called Enterprise Policy Scoreboard, Europe is becoming more entrepreneurial - the image of entrepreneurship has improved, and an increasing percentage of the population claimed to be willing to take business risks.
But compared with the US, a gap still yawns.
Mr Liikanen said that 70% of Americans have considered becoming self-employed, compared with only half of Europeans.
Many Europeans are put off setting up businesses by the looming mountain of red tape that firms are believed to face, Mr Liikanen said.
|
Clearly something needs to be done about that. We have to think about how to reform Europe to keep up with the US economically. Should Europe simply emulate the US, or do you have other suggestions? What aspects of the US system would you agree to copy.
Come on, lets get a discussion going. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Bob Dornan
|
|
Cut taxes, more individual freedoms to the people, build up military, participate more strongly on American and pro freedom intiatives worldwide.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Bob Dornan
|
|
You're a lot weirder than Giancarlo. It takes one to know one?
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Roland
|
 |
Auf'm Jahrmarkt :(
May 1999
time: 06:16
|
|
Ok, in order:
"Erkki Liikanen, European Commissioner for Enterprise, said that average wealth per head in the EU was just two-thirds of that in the US. This gap is the widest since the 1960s."
Wealth per head ? I guess he means gdp per capita, which is a quite lose indicator for "wealth". We're at about 70 % of US levels on that. The gap has grown recently with the US bubble.
"The resulting failure to innovate has dented average productivity per European worker, while US firms have become more efficient."
It is very uncertain whether there is any structural improvement in US productivity growth. As for europe, the picture is quite murky as labour market reforms tend to decrease average labour productivity.
"Corporate investment in information technology is equivalent to 2.4% of Europe's economic output, compared with a US figure of 4.5%, Mr Liikanen said."
I wonder whether they have adjusted those numbers for the differing methodologies. More importantly, investment per se is no value. The US has hugely overinvested in that field. In europe there were not much destorting incentives, so I'd say we roughly are where we should be on tech adoption.
"Despite EU plans to fight joblessness, the continent is still way off the target of an overall employment level of 70%. In the US, a far higher proportion of the population is in the labour force."
Didn't we have that recently ? IIRC, US 72 %, EU 63 or 64 %. Italy alone has maybe 3-4 million employed in the shadow economy, so let's not overhype those numbers. It is true that several members need further labour market reforms, but show me one anglosaxon economist who understands one bit about european labour laws.
"And because of their generally higher level of relevant skills, US workers are roughly one-third more productive than the EU average."
On a per worker basis, they are producing more because they work more hours. Hourly labour productivity is quite similar. If you believe the stats correctly reflect the US service sector, that is.
"Mr Liikanen said that 70% of Americans have considered becoming self-employed, compared with only half of Europeans."
Oh please. If 50 or 70 % of people set up businesses, I'll go into bancrupcy law and make a fortune. Stupid idea.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.
Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
23-11-2001 03:54
Let's do it all over again 
.
?
|