 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GP
PH and CA, how much will the restrictions affect US biotech research. How much of a percent impact on our companies? (in terms of lost discovery space). |
GP, et al.:
Hmm ... since I am not an economist nor very familiar with the firms that actually do the biotech work, anything I offer would be mere opinion.
With that in mind, I don't think U.S. biotech firms would move to Europe. Not at the rate they tax over there, anyhow. I do, however, think that the companies wouldn't be too hard pressed to spin off European-based subsidiaries or simply move the biotech part of their operations over to the Continent (someone else on this thread mentions that, too). Of course, Europe isn't necessarily *the* destination, either, as there are plenty of countries out there who might not have a problem hosting biotech research that delves into the human embryo side of research.
Personally, I don't think a ban will be enacted. Restrictions, yes, but no ban. When it comes to Republicans and Democrats, soft money seems to win the day most of the time, not ethics or morals.
CYBERAmazon
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Narck
|
 |
Houston, TX, USA
Apr 1999 time: 23:16
|
|
Bush stating that cloning is morally wrong does not necessarily imply that the Senate will immediately react and pass the measure banning human cloning, which was passed by the House a while back.
I believe there will be some restrictions (as there should be - after all, cloning for stem cells is one thing, cloning for specific reproductive purposes - creating the perfect baby - is quite another, IMO), and the measure will need to be adjusted before it will be passed --- hopefully.
Last edited by Narck on 27-11-2001 at 10:33
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Narck
Bush stating that cloning is morally wrong does not necessarily imply that the Senate will immediately react and pass the measure banning human cloning, which was passed by the House a while back.
I believe there will be some restrictions (as there should be - after all, cloning for stem cells is one thing, cloning for reproductive purposes - creating the perfect baby - is quite another, IMO), and the measure will need to be adjusted before it will be passed --- hopefully. |
A couple months ago, I'd agree with you. But about 90% of the time since 9-11, our esteemed Republicrat congresspeople have been fighting for places in line to give the old Lewinski to George II. (Figurtively speaking, of course... I apologize for that mental image.) If you disagree with Shrub, you run the risk of being labelled unpatriotic, or worse...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Saint Marcus
|
 |
Scio Me Nihil Scire
Jan 1970 time: 06:16
|
|
quote: However Mark L is still wrong, there is no way Europe will do this because [Northern] Europeans are so concerned about genetically modified food and science all together. |
Are you stupid or what? Holland is going to pass a law legalising cloning for medical purposes in 2 months. Last time I checked, Holland is a [Northern] European country. Though if you mean by Northern Europe countries like Norway and Sweden you may be right, but Holland is definetly going to allow this. Let me give you some information on Holland's politics.
Tweede Kamer (Second Chamber), Parliament
Pro:
* Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA, Labour Party). Centre-left liberals: 45 seats
* Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democracy (VVD, People's party for Freedom and Democracy). Right wing liberals: 38 seats
* Democraten 66 (D66, Democrats '66): Centre liberals: 14 seats
* Groenlinks (Green-left). Left wing liberals: 11 seats
* Socialistische Partij (SP, Socialist Party). Left wing liberals: 5 seats
Against:
*Christen Democratisch Appel (CDA, Christian Democratic Appeal). Centre conservatives: 29 seats
* ChristenUnie (Christian-Union). Right wing conservatives: 5 seats
* Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP, State Reformed Party). Right wing conservatives: 3 seats
Total: 150 votes, 37 against VS 113.
Eerste Kamer (First Chamber), Senate
Pro:
* Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA, Labour Party). Centre-left liberals: 15 seats
* Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democracy (VVD, People's party for Freedom and Democracy). Right wing liberals: 19 seats
* Democraten 66 (D66, Democrats '66): Centre liberals: 4 seats
* Groenlinks (Green-left). Left wing liberals: 8 seats
* Socialistische Partij (SP, Socialist Party). Left wing liberals: 2 seats
Against:
*Christen Democratisch Appel (CDA, Christian Democratic Appeal). Centre conservatives: 20 seats
* ChristenUnie (Christian-Union). Right wing conservatives: 4 seats
* Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP, State Reformed Party). Right wing conservatives: 2 seats
* Independant: 1 seat
Total: 75 votes, 27 against VS 48.
In other words, this law is going to pass without any problems in a month or two.
Unless of course, you happen to have a degree in Dutch politics and you have some insights I don't have.
Yeah right! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr.Oogkloot
|
|
I would agree that banning cloning research is a bad thing. I've never heard an ethical objection to it that made much sense, and it could be useful.
If humanity can be improved through genetic engineering, that's all the better. I think when such a thing is possible it would be grossly immoral to allow unimproved humans to be born - who are we to burden future generations with all kinds of defects just because it's "natural"? Who are we not to play God?
If an unimportant, fairly harmless thing such as cloning already causes such a scared reaction, I wonder how people will react to the technologies that could really change life in many ways, if they can be reached - nanotechnology, high levels of artificial intelligence and the like.
And to the left-wingers here who oppose genetic engineering when done by corporations: I hope this will not cause you to reject the technology itself - it would make much more sense to support the technology while arguing for a somewhat better implementation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr.Oogkloot
|
|
I have no objection to that Provost (though I don't necessarily agree that's what's happening here), but I hope it won't make you against the technology itself as seems to have happened often to people in the left wing. The way I see it the misuses of the technology people are protesting about are (even if correct) trivial issues compared to ensuring that the technology itself is used fully (or almost fully, whatever).
So, I'm not saying you're wrong (or right) about this misuse, but that your concentration (and that of people who have similar opinions) should be elsewhere.
BTW - I don't think anyone can ever understand every implication of a technology.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Spin
|
|
America loves money more than she loves religion. I hope for her sake that Europe realises that, and takes full advantage of her temporary opportunity.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|