 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
What is it with Americans named Walker going off and getting involved in foreign civil wars? |
Do you think he's related to the Captain Walker who went to Central America in the early 19th century to set up his own kingdom?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sachmo71
|
|
de Tejas
May 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
This is a very stickey situation. Everyone here has made good points, but if we do try him and execute him for this, the backlash from the Muslims of the world may be more than we can handle. Plus, isn't it part of his religion to allow him to fight to defend the holy land? That's another can of worms we don't want to open...
IMHO, this guy should disappear for a while...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:16
|
|
Well sachmo, those militants are totally handleable. (Is that a word?) I don't think they are anything to worry about, they can try to pull some sh1t, all they will gain is a rain of fire down on their country.
Part of me thinks we can take the opportunity to make this guy an example by showing the world how forgiving and compassionate we are. That doesn't mean letting him go, but maybe go halfway.
The other half of me wants to go b1tch slap the guy, especially since he said he supported Sept. 11. (Unless he was saying that because his comrades were listening, and he didn't want THEM to kick his ass, which I think might be a slim chance).
It's a toss up.
Maybe we act "nice" this time, and if that is taken as a sign of weakness, then the next guys get caught, tough luck.
You know what, after thinking that through, those militants don't even seem to recognize compassion, they only take it as a sign of weakness.
So Mr. Traitor, maybe our boys should be given authorization to do their thing.
Micro Charlaton Adam Smith,

EDIT: just sounded like a Jerry Springer guest with my White Ebonics. Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! 
Last edited by Ted Striker on 03-12-2001 at 23:04
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:16
|
|
Lefty - quote: Declaration of war is legally irrelevant to treason. |
It is if the accused lives in another country and is defending that country and it's government from US attacks.
quote: The res is waging war against the USA by a citizen, whether declared, undeclared, police action, rebelion, or what ever. |
The act of treason requires that the accused is waging war against the US and/or aiding and abetting the enemy - no declaration of war, no enemy. Since he cannot be charged with aiding and abetting an enemy absent an actual declaration of war, the accused must be actively waging war against the US, but this guy was only defending himself from attack - from the NA and if the US was a participant, illegal attacks. Otherwise anyone who resists an unlawful (or lawful) arrest would be guilty of treason. Again, the Rosenburgs were not charged with treason because no war had been declared against the USSR.
quote: 99.9% of treason aginst the US has not been in declared wars, mostly rebellions, of which the most was in the US civil war. A blanket pardon was made by Lincoln after the war, as was done for most rebelions. |
First, what has happened since the Constitution's ratification is not a constitutional endorsement of those later actions. However, these are domestic matters where the accused has actually taken part in the rebellion, not when someone overseas is defending themself in an undeclared war.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|