 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gavrushka
|
 |
Darlington,Co. Durham,UK
Apr 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
Dugrik.... your game, your choice.... these are my thoughts, this is not a ruling.........If a player is rated in all games, and is doing badly in one, then it is encouragement to take up another to counteract it.... ALSO, the way the ratings work now, if you are doing well in other games, you will NOT go into freefall.... only 10% of your rating is staked in each game..... also in a six player game, if player 6 does not get rated, because he does not want to lose points - then it is the fifth placed player that gets hammered in the ratings.. is that fair?? I know that in PBEM there are no restarts for bad land, so what I would suggest is why doesn't the moderator reveal the map before the game starts, and decide whether the game can go ahead fairly??
I will not update this game until Nimrod and Dugrik decide..... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gavrushka
|
 |
Darlington,Co. Durham,UK
Apr 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
RATINGS UPDATED
Swissy takes second place from PN, but a single positive result for PN will reverse the positions.....
I have a suggestion - IF the majority agree, isntead of losing points for a loss, the system can be tweaked easily so that you just gain a much smaller amount, but never lose..... Essentially at the minute everyone stakes 10% of their score on the game, and the 10% is deducted from your total, then the pot of points is divided according to position.... I could instead not deduct your stake from your scores...There is no chance of someone who is losing in 100 games taking the lead on the rankings! you score very very little for the lower positions.... What this would mean is that all players would stay rated, the best players would still be at the top, but no one will lose because of a single game where there land is bad, or they simply got ganged up on by other players... If Lung started in a new 8 player game, and came last - he would lose about 2.7 points.... under the proposed system he would gain, but only .2 of a point..... I cannot see a drawback to this proposal - but all game moderators ask on theor threads, and then everyone will have to go rated in all games!! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gavrushka
|
 |
Darlington,Co. Durham,UK
Apr 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
IS there a really bad case of apathy going round here?? I realise you all suffered from the lack of updates to the rating system, for that I apologise... I asked about a change to the ratings system to BENEFIT the game for everyone, and not a single person has responded, do people even want a rating system... It is a massive amount of effort, and I don't do it for self gratification, I am doing it because I love the game, as I assume others do.... IF people are not interested in a ranking system then it would be foolish to carry on with it.... Perhaps everyone lost heart when Quinns departed, I know it was a hell of a blow, but I find it difficult to do this just for the sake of it ...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|