 |
|
Dejango
|
|
I put Egypt because they are religious, and get anarchy bonus plus temple/cathedral bonuses (good for democracy) and they are industrious...thus better workers, which means for a fast expansion. I'm an economic/political person. My empire with egypt now is dominating the culture so much that it is almost 12 civs equal my one culture rating.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
satyajedi
|
|
Greeks. I think they are the ultimate in the building / pacifistic strategy. The commercial gives me an edge in the rampant corruption problem, the scientific helps me with cheap libraries and universities that so dramatically help my culture. And the Hopilite gives me an easy way to defend my cities in the ancient period (plus, I like getting the early golden age from the Hops).
-Satya
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ironikinit
|
|
My favorite one used to be Babylon, but lately it's been Japan.
Scientific ability takes a back seat to the leaders a properly managed militaristic country can produce, and religion is worth it just for the cheap temples alone.
Add to that a fast unique unit that requires only iron, has a good attack and defense, and comes along at an opportune time for a solid golden age, Japan rocks.
Apparently people don't agree. At the time of my vote, I was the only one who voted for Japan and Babylon had none.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowwHand
|
 |
of The Cooler
Sep 1999 time: 23:17
|
|
I think I'm clearing in my mind on this.
Science is nice, but it can be controlled.
Commercial, I'll try to wipe out that Civ early.
Expansionist, nice but not what I need.
Industrious is really nice, but I can only pick 2.
For me:
Militaristic, I like how the progression to elite hastens.
Religious, culture is a big deal.
All III needs is to be MP.
Last edited by SlowwHand on 14-01-2002 at 00:09
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TinCow
|
|
I voted French, but that's only partially true. I like the French industrial and commercial power in large games with fewer civs where I can expand peacefully. Their UU I don't find to be that usefull (especially because I can't upgrade to it), but it does appear at a perfect time to get a fabulously prosperous Golden Age.
However, in smaller games and/or games with lots of competition (i.e. Standard w/ 16 civs) I prefer the Romans. Militaristic is a must for early warfare, and the UU is pretty damn useful in combat. It large numbers, Legions can take cities very effectively and hold them as well... Legions become a moving wall of military expansion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ironikinit
|
|
I think the U.S. would be cooler if they were commercial/industrious and had a special cavalry unit sim. to the russians or a special artillery unit. An infantry special unit could be cool, with a +2 offense. Post industrial revolution UU should get +2 to their ability. (The base number is significantly higher for offense and defence of all units.) That would also give the Germans a bigger attack, too.
I haven't seen a modern era golden age, but it sounds like it would just make a lot of pollution. Does it?
Persians have a better UU than Roman
Try the samauri. Good unit, militaristic country.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Calorman
|
|
I like the barbarians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowwHand
|
 |
of The Cooler
Sep 1999 time: 23:17
|
|
I'd say you need work on your Aztec strategy then.
Lot of Roman and French advocates voting.
Last edited by SlowwHand on 14-01-2002 at 21:33
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|