 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Criticising Civ for not having a WWII scenario is like criticising a dog for not being a cat. |
That's right. Civ is a game about history. That whole WWII thing never happened.
[...adjusts tin foil in left ear...]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DaShi
|
 |
The Taste of Japan
Sep 2000 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Oh my.
Venom and hate? Whence does the venom and hate originate? Maybe with the people who hate the game and post incessantly to that effect. And those who belittle others who like the game. Where does it start DaShi?
|
Actually it started with those who liked the game, but hated those who didn't. The first complaints were rather tame and fair, but were met with extreme resistance. Now they can't take what they dish out. Frankly, some people take this game too seriously. Hell, I was attacked for making a few jokes about the game. Now I'm in some stupid debate with children.
quote:
Yin taken more heat? I think he has dished it out in full measure to what he has received in return. Just my opinion, not a mathematical study. I don't think anybody ever flamed him for what he attempted to contribute to civ3 during it's development.
|
Again, Yin's only arguments were about the game and Firaxis. He made very clear what he saw was the problem and avoided childish insults. However, those who like the game only retorted with flames and "troll" remarks. I don't blame him for getting a little fed up with it. I guess these people can't defend the game they love, so they have to insult the people to who criticize it.
quote:
Frightening Fanaticism? Isn't the negative aspect of fanaticism the part where that with which you do not agree becomes the enemy? Maybe like the game, or the people who like the game. I personally do not see a problem with behaviour bordering on the fanatical if it is directed in a positive, constructive direction. Was Mother Theresa a menace? The problem is when it is negative and destructive. Just my opinion.
|
I'm only complaining about the negative fanaticism. See above.
quote:
On the subject of destructive fanaticism, the people who like the game are capable of it too. When they (we) flame in response to criticism we descend to the negative. Then the critics flame, then the fans flame, and then the ... What's the point?
|
Exactly my point. If someone criticizes a game you like, point out its good points or walk away and play the game you like. Not everyone is going to like it, and you should respect that opinion.
quote:
I found that once some of the critics and some of the fans (myself included) dropped the hatchet(s), I started to have more fun on these boards. I gained more insights. And I've actually been able to engage in some constructive conversations, even with *gasp* Yin. Did you know that Lib can be quite funny? No, you wouldn't if all you want to do is hate him.
|
I've had no problems with Lib. He's been on both sides and understands the problem. Hell, I've even listened to you! 
quote:
The bottom line is that when the people who do not like the game go negative, they invite more negative. When the people who like the game go negative, we invite MUCH more negative. Such is the nature of fanaticism, on both sides.
|
So it is wrong to not like the game. Or maybe we should just say, "Isn't it great how terrible it is not be able to move stacked units . The actual difference comes when people start attacking other people. You can attack any game you want for all I care. I like Deus Ex. You can call it a piece of garbage, but I won't attack you for that.
quote:
I do have to admit though, that I would have preferred if all the hatchets could have been buried, IN YINs BACK. Just kidding, sortta.
Salve |
I just like to have a little fun. I'm disappointed with CivIII. I was looking forward to the game. I was hoping that Firaxis would learn from their mistakes in SMAC in PR and QA. I like to make a few jibes about the game and Firaxis. You like to make a few jibes at Yin. All in good friendly fun. But I make sure to never cross a line. And I never attack a fellow poster unless provoked. Unfortunately, a lot of the children here need to chill and get over themselves.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
A bit of history...
I think some of the people might not understand that, at one time, I was a staunch Firaxis defender. That changed when, to my great embarrassment, I opened a thread for the sole purpose of proving to the whiners that Firaxis will respond to people who have shown them respect. (That would have been me, for instance.) I quickly became a laughingstock as Firaxis left me hanging to dry. I could say "just be patient" to Yin only so many times. To his credit, Yin was kind and gave me every out to save face.
Once I had converted, and expressed my outrage at the treatment I had received, a Firaxian finally responded. He blamed me. That's right. Me. I hadn't turned on my private messaging or displayed my e-mail. Double whammy.
Since that time, I've offered olive branches that the fanboys have stomped on like swine stomping pearls. They've never wanted to see any reconciliation between former fans and Firaxis. After all, they would lose their perceived high ground. They're like Pharisees, jealous of the successes of others.
I cannot imagine what Firaxis might do now to earn my respect. Certainly, an apology would be a start. But I've lost my naive expectation of anything other than the status quo, i.e., being summarily ignored.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
No, oh enlightened one. Not that thread. My name is not ShaggyRA.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Alexnm:
First, I'd like to thank you for your civility, and your restraint from casting me as a one-dimensional caricature. I'm not sure I can pigeonhole myself into one of your categories, but I'm most likely somewhere between (or within) 2 and 3.
Someone got it closest to right when he conjectured that I am like a lover scorned. Some say that I overestimate my own importance, and that, because I am a customer, I believe I deserve special treatment. Others say that I underestimate my own importance, and that, because I am given to blunt expository, I am causing Firaxis to stay away. But I'm neither one. I'm just a customer who is disappointed that he has been disrespected despite that he has good ideas to offer.
I have one single categorical complaint about Civ3 — the interface, i.e., the mechanics by which the player is connected to the game. That covers such things as group movement, civilopedia availability, unit activation sequencing, and so on. The careful reader will observe that I have never criticized the AI or the combat algorithms. In fact, even now I continue to praise Soren for his remarkable work.
I can live with knowing that my ideas are either liked or disliked. I have a hard time living with the notion that my ideas do not even merit acknowledgment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Shaggy, please try to get your mind off my ass.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Taxidopolis
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TheHobbit
I know I forgot a lot of the positive sides of the game so please post and list what you LIKE about the game. |
(hope the quote thingy works, i'm not used to it..)
I really like the diplomacy options/trade deals and stuff in this version of Civ, the tech options are pretty cool too, and seeing a coal resource up for grabs in no-mans-land and tring to get to it first and then keeping it is great fun too...just a few of my favourite things at the moment.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|