 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
The Blind Atheist
Yes folks. It truely takes a miracle for an atheist to believe that there was no intelligent mental source necessary for the beginning of life.
I wish I could take full part in this discussion but I don't have the oportunity here in Thailand. The relevant portion of the book can be easily found in chapter 4 (Snowflakes and DNA) but I really think that if you are an atheist you should read the whole thing. Only one who believes in miracles could deny the evidence that is plain for all to see -- unless they are blind.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Thailand sounds cool
I had a freind from there in highschool, but we drifted appart when she chose a different path then I
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Lincoln
you arrived back just in time for another EVC going christian
maybe this time he will stay so for longer
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lars-E
|
|
Welcome back, Lincoln.
So how do Thai women compare to Western women?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
Creationists. Bah, always the same arguments, never any proof...
I've just read the first few chapters of your text:
Just because you don't understand it yet, doesn't mean it needed an external force to drive it.
Retrotransposons, LINEs etc are generally thought to be the remainders of old retroviral infections. Just look at any retrovirus and you'll see LTRs. And yes they do act as agents of mutation, and regulation. That doesn't mean they were stuck there on purpose. It just means that chance dictates that some insertion events will have a positive effect. This also means that all individuals where it was integrated in a less opportune place will have died, and failed to pass on their genes.
If you look for design, you can find it. However, the simpler solution is taking into account the time and number of generations that have passed before that what you see now is available. You have read Dawkins, so you know the example of the photosensitive patch that goes on to become an eye, gaining advantage after advantage.
Large-scale mutations also happen, generally after mutation of homeobox genes (for example we can mutate flies so that they have legs on their head instead of antennea). These are nearly always extremely detrimental, though at some point (maybe a one in a trillion chance) something good will come of it. If this gives a selective advantage it will remain in the population.
There's no God, no creator being. There's just chance and a hell of a lot of time. You say that the statue can't wave, however if you had a billion statues and watched them over billion years one of the hands will wave. I know believing in evolution isn't pretty, in that all the failures fall by the roadside, but it is far less delusional than believing in a creator.
I'll keep it at that for now, but bring me more arguments and I'll crush 'em.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
For those short of time try the chapter on intelligent intervention (I think it is ch 5) and I will get bact to you when I can. . .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
Hi DinoDoc buddy. Thanks for your comments Goingonit. I don't think you have read the book either. Because the morality issue is also just an incidental point I made along the way. Get back to me when you have read more of it. Read the objections section for somewhat of a summary and also the Conclusion. I really have to go now. I can't believe this connection lasted for more than 5 minutes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
Goingonit,
You are correct that the site does precede from the conclusion that God must exist but that is only after it is shown by evidence that he must exist. Then I build upon that evidence. The evidence that he must exist is found in the communicative instructions that are found in DNA and also in the intricate machinery of even an early biological organism. This was not Behe's argument although his assertions certainly add to the evidence. He was assuming that evolution was already working. I am concentrating on the beginning itself.
information laws require a mental source in order to provide true communication and not just abstract "information" that some like to define to avoid the issue. There is true communication within the machinery of life. It is absurd to conclude that life is an exception to established information law. An intelligent mental source must exist unless it is proved that the information laws are not in effect.
DinoDoc,
I really don't like teaching English because it is really too irrelevant (Moduls, helping verbs, etc. etc.) but I do like interacting with the Thai people. It can be quite fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|