 |
|  |
 |
|
Alinestra Covelia
|
 |
I sense the dodgy presence of Bing - a presence I've not felt since...
Feb 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I don't see it as propaganda. It's not pushing any sort of government policy in most cases. |
Sometimes the most effective propaganda relies on the fact that it works very subtly. Karl Marx differentiated between the Repression State Apparatus (which consists of easily-visible methods of control such as tanks, guns, and soldiers) and the Ideological State Apparatus (which consists of media control and other oblique methods of instilling an ideology).
In the primary case, resistance is easy since the state apparatus is highly visible, but in the latter case, it is much more difficult to consciously organize a resistance (whether it's a personal decision to trust it less, or a community initiative to protest, etc). Ideological state apparatus, according to Marx, works best when it is least detectable.
Of course, I don't go so far as to condemn Hollywood films as being puppets of the state propagandists, although that is a possibility. I think it's far more probable that they're just naturally crap.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drekkus
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MacTBone
Most people like everything to neatly fall into their places, that guy is bad, he just killed people for fun, that guy is good, he tried to save those children, you see where I'm going? So, they clearly define who the bad guys and the good guys are, with hardly a plot twist thrown in.
|
I'm well aware of the fact that Hollywood's main concern is making money. A storyline where some americans, against all the terrible odds, overcome due to their superior wit and courage, is what draws the crowds. And offcourse I don't have to go see it.
It's just that the principle of blurring history and american fantasy is what keeps this viscious cycle going. Hollywood makers showing the crowd USA USA USA, and the crowd going USA USA USA because it says so on the screen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:17
|
|
... I remember that I'm watching a movie.
Of course movies are going to get facts wrong - by the nature of the medium it is impossible (and would be boring as hell) if they had to get every little detail right.
To me, quibbling about the historical accuracy of a movie is kinda like Star Wars nerds arguing over the "correctness" of the various designs of the space ships. 
Of course, the example given by Connorkimbro... well, that's just laziness and should've been picked up by somebody/somewhere along the moviemaking chain (screenwriter, director, actors, key grip, cinematographer, etc.) After all, it's not as if the actor spoke the lines alone, with no one around to hear him.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ZoboZeWarrior
|
 |
of anonym losers ... :[
Mar 2001 time: 06:17
|
|
Many American movies are really pityfull. When we see scenes acting in France (generally Paris), they are at 99,99% wrong or out-dated !
French are all wearing with elegant but out-dated clothed. And the described relation-ship between American and French are biased (Godzilla is a perfect example of misconception or pure lies).
I can understand that a guy living in Texas don't care how are clothed or how speak a french. But a film-maker must be more interested in other culture if he want to make a somewhat realistic film.
In Example of Godzilla 'bad guy' are inversed : This no more the USA who create the monster, but the french. Now the victim in the USA !! Funny...
Since a decade, USA is always the victim of nasty or unconscious nations, aliens or meteor phenomenums ...
Eimrich movies are real bullshit. A president piloting a F16 and blasting evil Aliens ? no probs ! An american genius making in few hours a computer virus on an unknowned alien network ? For sure !
Gibson movies sucks too : Good American vs Evil bastard english during the independence war ?
ikii ...
The problem is not that they are unrealistic, the problem is those movies don't respect people, historical facts and other cultures. It's why I think they are really bad.
Don't think that I'm a guy who spit automaticly on "USA" movies.
Quite the opposite, since many amercian movies are good or very good too. There is a lot of good movies (Good scenarii too, good picture and special effect), really good actors and savoir-faire.
American movies are very special and some french or european movies makers tried to do as the american ways, but many failed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drekkus
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
An example please? Name a movie from, say the 1930's-1950's where the movie's impact has so overwhelmed the national consciousness that it's view of events is now considered documented fact by my (or the Baby Boom) generation.
Thanks! |
Considering the fact that most US posters here are more historic consious than the average american:
How many times have american posters here in OT posted something along the lines of: We saved your asses in WWII when we came to your aid. Thereby denying the fact that until dec 7, 1941 the USA was more than willing to sit back, relax and sell weapons. Not until being attacked and Germany declaring war on the USA did the USA start a war effort. All the heroic war movies depicting the USA as the great liberator has put an image of noble americans coming to the free worlds aid, not of realpolitiker who tried at all cost to avoid being dragged into the war.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MacTBone
Alright, some of you are obviously missing out on the main prpose of a movie. It's there to entertain. |
Let me introduce the one quote"
"The most important art for us is the cinema."
V.I. Lenin
Cinema was always the major propaganda tool.
quote: What about the accuracy of "The Hunt For Red October" |
This movie is the bullshit.
quote: What about the accuracy of "Forrest Gump"? |
When I saw this movie I didn't thought that Americans is the greatest nation in the world. I thought that American’s director who shoot this movie was real genius, he make movie understandable for peoples of all kind of nationalities. This movie was about goodness and love, not about the Americans as the greatest nation in this world, but films like this is really rare. I respect people who created this film. I am only sad that such film is unique
quote: What about the accuracy of "Animal House"? |
Sorry I didn’t saw this film.
Last edited by Serb on 22-02-2002 at 19:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ZoboZeWarrior
Many American movies are really pityfull. When we see scenes acting in France (generally Paris), they are at 99,99% wrong or out-dated !
...French are all wearing with elegant but out-dated clothed. And the described relation-ship between American and French are biased (Godzilla is a perfect example of misconception or pure lies) |
Perfect example.
quote: The problem is not that they are unrealistic, the problem is those movies don't respect people, historical facts and other cultures. It's why I think they are really bad. |
It is exactly what I’ve want to said.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alynzia
I'm always annoyed when movies gloss over a character being homosexual or bisexual just to make a story to please the majority.
...
Hey, heoric dead people, you can be a hero as long as we don't portray you as gay.
|
There are currently three (THREE!) Alexander the Great projects underway in Hollywood. Does anyone know if ANY of them are going to be portraying Alexander's homosexual/bisexual tendancies?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drekkus
Considering the fact that most US posters here are more historic consious than the average american:
How many times have american posters here in OT posted something along the lines of: We saved your asses in WWII when we came to your aid. Thereby denying the fact that until dec 7, 1941 the USA was more than willing to sit back, relax and sell weapons. Not until being attacked and Germany declaring war on the USA did the USA start a war effort. All the heroic war movies depicting the USA as the great liberator has put an image of noble americans coming to the free worlds aid, not of realpolitiker who tried at all cost to avoid being dragged into the war. |
Pretty non-responsive Drekkus. You haven't made your case that the posters getting their ideas from the movies (or any particular movie, which is what I asked for.) The cause and effect in your argument is lacking - did the belief cause the movies or did the movies cause the belief? And if it was the movies fault, which movies?
And using a quote by Lenin... well, you see what happened to his philosophy. Obviously the movies couldn't convince the people enough to keep them in the chains of Communism. (edit: Oops! Not your quote, Drekkus, it was Serb who quoted the fool. Well, I can hardly resist taking swipes at Communism so I'll just leave this here)
Also, saying "we saved your asses in WW2," while rude and arrogant, does not necessarily imply "we deny that we did nothing for the first two years." Only the young and the argumentally challenged (coinage!) expect disclaimers that list every single alternative/rebuttal to their own arguments.
Lastly, war movies... well, dude, they are about war. By definition one cannot make a war movie about an army not at war. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drekkus
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Pretty non-responsive Drekkus. You haven't made your case that the posters getting their ideas from the movies (or any particular movie, which is what I asked for.) The cause and effect in your argument is lacking - did the belief cause the movies or did the movies cause the belief? And if it was the movies fault, which movies? |
That's the point I was trying to make earlier. It's the vicious cycle the warmovies are in: Hollywood gives the audience what it wants (YEAH USA) and the audience screams YEAH USA because there are given it on the screen. It's not one particular movie, it's a trend in american war movies since WWII which has caused many americans (note 'many', not all) to believe American resolve and courage singlehandedly have saved the world from evil. The continual misinformation only keeps that believe alive.
This link here I found today, and is about a new series that's about to be developed about a REALITY show about the front lines:
http://reuters.com/news_article.jht...&StoryID=615288
"Nevertheless, the program will be "patriotic in nature," van Munster acknowledged. "The men and women who are fighting in this conflict, they deserve their moment," he said.
"While we're sitting in the comfort of our home, we want to see how these guys are taking care of business." "
Patriotism is what scores. That's what american portrayel of armed conflicts are about. Not reality. And if the facts have to suffer, too bad.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Serb
few examples made by jamorobo in "Stop the America bashing" forum:
Quote originaly posted by jamorobo:
Saving private Rian = A fairy tale war where britian never existed and was never on the beaches. It portrays the americans valiently crusading on the beaches getting slaughted against overwelming enemys. where the truth was the omaha beach was so hard to takes as the US did not want to use any help from the british who offered:
Now on to the Patriot
A historian said " With their own record of killing 12 million American indians and surporting slavery 4 decades after britian abolished it, Americans wish to project their historical guilt on to someone else. "
As you can see American just in its film industry has made alot of people unhappy. Esp the english by removing them and putting a large "Made in USA" it its place." |
The British and the Americans landed on seperate beaches! That is historical fact! The US had "snorkel" tanks too, but the seas at Omaha were rougher on that day and ours sank. The brits could not possibly have offered effective help during this time period, the few hours during which the US forces were tied up on the beach because the British forces were too far away.
America killed 12 million Indians? Gee. Historians estimate that when Columbus landed there were 80 million people living in the western hemisphere. By the time the English landed there were only 10 million left. That's 10 million scatterd over BOTH continents, with the largest concentrations still being in what is now Mexico and Peru. By 1600 there were no more than 2 million natives living in the area of the current continental United States. So I guess we killed them all 6 times over. Either that or in our bloodlust we exterminated Mexico and Peru.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|