 |
|
caveman
|
|
I've got 5 armies of 4 tanks each. I just got Modern Armor. Can I not upgrade the tanks in the armies to armor. If not, what were they thinking?
If so, how?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sean
|
|
Auckland, New Zealand.
Jan 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
Yes, it is really frustrating not being able to upgrade the units in armies, so I generaly don't build armies until calvary.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:19
|
|
I personally don't mind the no upgrade policy. To me, it adds more strategery to the game. Do I make the army now, of mws incase there is a well fortified hill town? Or do I use the GL on a wonder, in the hopes that I get a GL later on to make an army.
If you really don't like it, you can just disband the army, puts out quite a bit of shields when you do. Not sure if you could do that in the city building the army, if you could, then you would get maybe a new half-priced army.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Solver
|
|
Apolyton Duke Of Something
|
 |
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000 time: 07:19
|
|
Armies should be kept, but they're slightly weaker than they were supposed to be before the release - then they were supposed to be something of great power.
Currently, it's just a unit with more hit points, that can't be upgraded. If I got an army of Samurai, and everyone gets Nationalism (Gunpowder, to a lesser extent), all I can do with the army is defending.
When playing Militaristic civs, I noticed that there are lots of Leaders, despite my peacful style. And always use your first one to build an army, just for the Heroic Epic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Redstar
|
|
i think its fine the way it is...you can build an army and not fill it right away..so you can get more leaders.
even better -- when you win often enough with your army you can build small wonders to allow you to make armies...so in a way you can upgrade at your convenience (by spitting out new ones).
The part that is not fine is covered in another good post.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Austin
|
|
quote: Originally posted by zulu9812
Not being able to upgrade units in armies wasn't an oversight: it was a design decision. Can't understand why, though. |
Because until fairly recently armies tend to ossify and stick with technology and methods even when newer advancements pass them by.
For example despite all the evidence to the contrary the British army in 1916 was STILL trying to use Napoleonic style tactics (bombard, then charge) against machine guns, with predictable results.
The die hard cavalry charges of von Bredow into the muzzles of French riflemen in 1870, the stubborn refusal of many armies to accept the consequences of gunpowder, Admiral Sir Tom Phillips refusing to admit AFTER Pearl Harbor that ships could be sunk by aircraft right up until the Japanese sunk him, the list goes on and on.
Remember that grouping your troops together into an army means you need a lot of beaurocracy. And bearocracies don't like change.
Austin
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Evil_Eric_4
|
|
quote: I agree I never build armies as you loose your ability to attack more than once. |
Micky--
This has been fixed.Any army can attack as many times as they have units. Unless a unit in the army dies -then the next resumes the attack but you lose that units attack.
Example--An army of 4 Cavalry attacks a city--If the first attack succeeds then you will be allowed to attack again-up to 4 times.
If however the first cavalry fails it will retreat and the next unit will resume the battle.In this case then you would only have 2 attacks after that.
I dont know if im making sense to you but these are my observations in 1.21.
One question I do have though is why cant you form Artillary armies?
Even if it gives no benefit I would still build them just so I can move the things 4 at a time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Austin
|
|
quote: Originally posted by zulu9812
Hold up Austin - the Armies in civ3 are not the armies of the real world. The armies you're talking about are equivalent to your civ's entire military. I always thought of Civ3's Armies as being brigades or corps - simply large collections of troops. |
This is true, however even within armies you often have big differences. When von Seekt and Co. where hashing out the doctrine that was to become stormtrooper tactics on the Eastern Front during WWI, Falkenhein was trying to take Verdun by bashing it old style.
Having legions running around in 1940 is a bit silly though.
Austin
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|